Abstract
Abrasive waterjet (AWJ), due to its unique advantages over the traditional machining process, has been used as a main machining tool extensively. However, the kerf profile defect, which is inherent to AWJ cutting, is one of the major obstructions that limit its applications in high-precision cutting. To improve the precision of AWJ cutting, an intensive study on kerf profile is very important. Previous researchers used taper to characterize kerf profile generated by AWJ in past years. However, we find that the requirement of precision cutting cannot be satisfied by using taper error to describe the kerf profile defect and further by tilting cutting nozzle a taper angle in the opposite direction to eliminate taper error. In this paper, the parameters which might affect the kerf profile have been investigated in detail. Based on the investigation, the kerf profile has been characterized by a mathematical model instead of a taper angle. With this mathematical model, predicting the kerf profile accurately according to the cutting conditions becomes feasible.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hashish M (2004) Precision cutting of thick materials with AWJ. In: BHR group 2004 water jetting, pp 33–46
Hashish M (2007) Benefits of dynamic waterjet angle compensation. In: 2007 American WJTA conference and expo. Houston, Texas, USA, pp 2007:1-H
Maccarini G, Monno M, Pellegrini G, Ravasio C (2008) Characterization of the AWJ kerf: the influence of material properties. In: the 19th international conference on water jetting. Nottingham, UK, pp 67–76
Matsui S, Matsumura H, Ikemoto Y, Tsujita K, Shimizu H (1990) High precision cutting method for metallic materials by abrasive water-jet. In: proceedings of the 10th international symposium on jet cutting technology. Amsterdam, pp 263–278
Hlaváč LM, Hlaváčová IM, Geryk V (2016) Taper of kerfs made in rocks by abrasive water jet (AWJ). International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, pp 1–7
Kechagias J, Petropoulos G, Vaxevanidis N (2012) Application of Taguchi design for quality characterization of abrasive water jet machining of TRIP sheet steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(5–8):635–643
Li H, Wang J (2015) An experimental study of abrasive waterjet machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1):1–9
Hlaváč LM, Hlaváčová IM, Geryk V, Plančár Š (2014) Investigation of the taper of kerfs cut in steels by AWJ. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(9–12):1811–1818
Chung Y, Geskin ES, Singh P (1992) Prediction of the geometry of the kerf created in the course of abrasive waterjet machining of ductile materials, Jet Cutting Technology. Springer Netherlands, pp 525–541
Groppetti R, Gutema T, Lucchio AD (1998) A contribution to the analysis of some kerf quality attributes for precision abrasive waterjet cutting. In: the 14th international conference on jetting technology. Brugge, Belgium, pp 253–269
Annoni M, Monno M (2000) A lower limit for the feed rate in AWJ precision machining. In: proceedings of the 15th international conference on jetting technology. Ronneby, Sweden, pp 285–296
Zeng J, Henning A (2009) Kerf characterization in abrasive water-jet cutting. In: 2009 American WJTA conference and expo. Houston, pp 1-H
Zeng J, Kim TJ, Wallace RJ (1992) Quantitative evaluation of machinability in abrasive water-jet machining. In: proceedings of the 1992 winter annual meeting of ASME, precision machining: technology and machine development and improvement. Anaheim, (PED-58):169–179
Shanmugam DK, Wang J, Liu H (2008) Minimisation of kerf tapers in abrasive water-jet machining of alumina ceramics using a compensation technique. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 48(14):1527–1534
Zeng J (1992) Mechanisms of brittle material erosion associated with high pressure abrasive waterjet processing—a modeling and application study, Dissertation
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S., Zhang, S., Wu, Y. et al. Exploring kerf cut by abrasive waterjet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93, 2013–2020 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0467-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0467-y