Skip to main content
Log in

A key parameter to characterize the kerf profile error generated by abrasive water-jet

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the only cold high-energy beam machining technology, abrasive water-jet (AWJ) is one of the most rapidly developed techniques in material manufacturing industry. However, the application of AWJ is limited by the cutting accuracy it can achieve. Kerf profile generated by AWJ is different as the cutting parameters change. As a result, it has become a major factor which affects the cutting accuracy when AWJ is used as a machining tool. Researchers used taper error to characterize kerf profile error generated by AWJ in the past years. And many efforts have been put on how to eliminate taper error by using a tilting cutting head of a 5-axis AWJ machine. However, using taper error to characterize the kerf profile error generated by AWJ is not accurate since kerf profile error might appear in different styles. And using a 5-axis AWJ machine to eliminate taper error is only effective in some special cases. To effectively eliminate taper error, the first thing needs to do is to find out whether the kerf profile error can be compensated or not. Based on research, a key parameter, named kerf profile coefficient O, which can be used to characterize kerf profile error and further to guide people to use different ways to compensate kerf profile error, has been defined in this paper. To further illustrate the efficiency of this coefficient, a series of cutting experiments have been carried out and the experimental results have been discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matsui S, Matsumura H, Ikemoto Y, Tsujita K, Shimizu H (1990) High precision cutting method for metallic materials by abrasive waterjet. In: proceedings of the 10th international symposium on jet cutting technology. Amsterdam, pp 263–278

  2. Zeng J, Henning A (2009) Kerf characterization in abrasive waterjet cutting. In: 2009 American WJTA conference and expo. Houston, pp 1-H

  3. Hashish M (2004) Precision cutting of thick materials with AWJ. In: BHR group 2004 water jetting, pp 33–46

  4. Hashish M (2007) Benefits of dynamic waterjet angle compensation. In: 2007 American WJTA conference and expo. Houston, pp 2007:1-H

  5. Maccarini G, Monno M, Pellegrini G, Ravasio C (2008) Characterization of the AWJ kerf: the influence of material properties. In: the 19th international conference on water jetting. Nottingham, pp 67–76

  6. Hlavác LM, Hlavácová IM, Geryk V (2016) Taper of kerfs made in rocks by abrasive water jet (AWJ). In: International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, pp 1–7

  7. Kechagias J, Petropoulos G, Vaxevanidis N (2012) Application of Taguchi design for quality characterization of abrasive water jet machining of TRIP sheet steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(5–8):635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li H, Wang J (2015) An experimental study of abrasive waterjet machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1):1–9

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hlavác LM, Hlavácová IM, Geryk V, Plancár Š (2014) Investigation of the taper of kerfs cut in steels by AWJ. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(9–12):1811–1818

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chung Y, Geskin ES, Singh P (1992) Prediction of the geometry of the kerf created in the course of abrasive waterjet machining of ductile materials, Jet Cutting Technology. Springer Netherlands, pp 525–541

  11. Groppetti R, Gutema T, Lucchio AD (1998) A contribution to the analysis of some kerf quality attributes for precision abrasive waterjet cutting. In: the 14th international conference on jetting technology. Brugge, pp 253–269

  12. Annoni M, Monno M (2000) A lower limit for the feed rate in AWJ precision machining. In: proceedings of the 15th international conference on jetting technology. Ronneby, pp 285–296

  13. Olsen J, Zeng J, Guglielmetti B (2003) Advanced error correction methodology applied to abrasive waterjet cutting. In: proceedings of the 2003 WJTA American waterjet conference. Houston, pp 5-D

  14. Hashish M (1984) A modeling study of metal cutting with abrasive waterjets. J Eng Mater Technol Trans ASME 106(1):88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeng J (1992) Mechanisms of brittle material erosion associated with high pressure abrasive waterjet processing—a modeling and application study, Dissertation

  16. Zeng J, Olsen J, Olsen C, Guglielmetti B (2005) Taper free abrasive waterjet cutting with a tilting head. In: 2005 WJTA American waterjet conference. Houston, pp 7A-2

  17. Shanmugam DK, Wang J, Liu H (2008) Minimisation of kerf tapers in abrasive waterjet machining of alumina ceramics using a compensation technique. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(14):1527–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shijin Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Zhang, S., Wu, Y. et al. A key parameter to characterize the kerf profile error generated by abrasive water-jet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 1265–1275 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9402-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9402-x

Keywords

Navigation