Skip to main content
Log in

New process of multi-point forming with individually controlled force-displacement and mechanism of inhibiting springback

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new process of multi-point forming with individually controlled force-displacement (MPF-ICFD) is presented to reduce the springback in the traditional multi-point forming (MPF). An experimental setup was designed and manufactured, and the contrast experiment was conducted to investigate the differences between the traditional MPF and the proposed MPF-ICFD. Furthermore, the stress state and springback mechanism in both processes were analyzed with the plastic forming theory. The differences in springback were also investigated with 1060 aluminum alloy and Q 295 steel. The results showed that the specimens in MPF-ICFD presented an excellent deformation uniformity and are consistent with the target profile. The springback magnitude of 1060 aluminum alloy is 34.63% in MPF while 7.51% in MPF-ICFD, and the springback magnitude of Q 295 steel is 31.16% in MPF while 17.02% in MPF-ICFD. The results demonstrate that the springback can be strongly inhibited by MPF-ICFD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li MZ, Cai ZY, Sui Z, Han QG (2002) Multi-point forming technology for sheet metal. J Mater Proces Technol 129(1):333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel FW, Jean FH, John MP (2003) Using reconfigurable tooling and surface heating for incremental forming of composite aircraft parts. J Manuf Sci Eng 125(2):333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Se YH, Jang HL, Yong SY, Yoo MJ (2010) Springback adjustment for multi-point forming of thick plates in shipbuilding. Comput Aided Des 42(11):1001–1012

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng JW, Li WD, Han JQ, Wan M, Meng B (2016) Kinetic locus design for longitudinal stretch forming of aircraft skin components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(9):3571–3582. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8456-0

  5. Edwin H, Robert CS, John MP (2002) Design and test of a reconfigurable forming die. J Manuf Process 4(1):77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel FW, David EH (1998) Design and analysis of reconfigurable discrete dies for sheet metal forming. J Manuf Syst 17(6):436–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu CG, Li MZ, Fu WZ (2008) Principles and apparatus of multi-point forming for sheet metal. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35(35):1227–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu YJ, Li MZ, Ju FF (2016) Research on the process of flexible blank holder in multi-point forming for spherical surface parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00170–016–9198-8

  9. Le L, Young HS, Seong CH, Beom SK, Jeong K (2010) Numerical simulations on reducing the unloading springback with multi-step multi-point forming technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1):45–61

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang QF, Cai ZY, Zhang Y, Li MZ (2013) Springback compensation method for doubly curved plate in multi-point forming. Mater Des 47(9):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cai ZY, Wang SH, Li MZ (2008) Numerical investigation of multi-point forming process for sheet metal: wrinkling, dimpling and springback. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(9):927–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Behnam D, Behrooz ZD (2014) Assessment of forming parameters influencing spring-back in multi-point forming process: a comprehensive experimental and numerical study. Mater Des 59(6):103–114

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bahloul R, Elechi SB, Potiron A (2006) Optimisation of springback predicted by experimental and numerical approach by using response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 173(1):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang SH, Cai ZY, Li MZ, Lan YW (2012) Numerical simulation on the local stress and local deformation in multi-point stretch forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(9):901–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Y, Li MZ (2014) Research on three-dimensional surface parts in multi-gripper flexible stretch forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(9):1701–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Daniel FW, Jayant L, Daniel RK (1998) Development of a reconfigurable tool for forming aircraft body panels. J Manuf Syst 17(4):287–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simona S, Mary CB (2001) A finite element based die design algorithm for sheet-metal forming on reconfigurable tools. J Eng Mater Technol 123(4):489–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yong TI, Daniel FW, Robert CS, John MP (2000) A comparison of pin actuation schemes for large-scale discrete dies. J Manuf Process 2(4):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pahl KJ (1997) New developments in multi-point die-cushion technology. J Mater Process Technol 71(1):168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Q, Wang ZR, Dean TA (2008) The mechanics of multi-point sandwich forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(12):1495–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Q, Wang ZR, Dean TA (2007) Multi-point sandwich forming of a spherical sector with tool-shape compensation. J Mater Process Technol 194(1):74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Q, Dean TA, Wang ZR (2006) Numerical simulation of deformation in multi-point sandwich forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(7):699–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Song AP, Wang LT, Chen T, Li LY (2008) The multi-point pressing and forming technology and its stamping process. J Plasticity Eng 15(5):108–114

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu ZW, Li MZ, Han QG (2012) Multi-point forming with wrinkle resistance function and its forming accuracy. J Mech Eng 48(12):56–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li MZ, Liu YH, Su SZ, Li GQ (1999) Multi-point forming: a flexible manufacturing method for a 3-d surface sheet. J Mater Process Technol 87(1):277–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng LF, Lai XM, Li MZ (2006) Transition surface design for blank holder in multi-point forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(46):1336–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cai ZY, Li MZ (2002) Mulit-point forming of three-dimensional sheet metal and the control of the forming process. Int J Press Vessel Pip 79(4):289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luo YX, Yang WM, Liu ZF, Wang YQ, Du RX (2016) Numerical simulation and experimental study on cyclic multi-point incremental forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5):1249–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu W, Chen YZ, Xu YC, Yuan SJ (2016) Evaluation on dimpling and geometrical profile of curved surface shell by hydroforming with reconfigurable multipoint tool. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(5):2175–2185. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-8264-y

  30. Heo SC, Seo YH, Ku TW, Kang BS (2010) A study on thick plate forming using flexible forming process and its application to a simply curved plate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1):103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin-bin Jia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, Bb., Wang, WW. New process of multi-point forming with individually controlled force-displacement and mechanism of inhibiting springback. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90, 3801–3810 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9709-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9709-7

Keywords

Navigation