Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of anterior knee joint instability with the Rolimeter A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer

A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

We report on a comparative measurement of anterior knee joint laxity on 30 healthy test subjects and 30 patients with anterior knee joint instability using a new knee testing device (Rolimeter) and the KT-1000 arthrometer compared to manual assessment of the anterior tibial translation in 30 ° flexion (Lachman’s test). We wanted to establish the reliability of the Rolimeter device compared to manual assessment and to the KT-1000 arthrometer. The statistical evaluation by means of an analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of 5% showed no significant difference in the exactitude of measurement between the Rolimeter and the KT-1000 arthrometer, but altogether a significant difference between both instrumental methods compared with manual assessment. Thus the Rolimeter provides an economic, exact and simply operating device for quantifying anterior knee joint instability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 5 September 1998 Accepted: 19 December 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balasch, H., Schiller, M., Friebel, H. et al. Evaluation of anterior knee joint instability with the Rolimeter A test in comparison with manual assessment and measuring with the KT-1000 arthrometer. Knee Surgery 7, 204–208 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050149

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050149

Navigation