Abstract
Purpose
Implementation of morphometric reference data from the contralateral, unaffected lower limb is suggested when reconstructing the coronal plane alignment in TKA. Limited information, however, is available which confirms this left-to-right symmetry in coronal alignment based upon radiographs. The purpose of the study was, therefore, (1) to verify if a left-to-right symmetry is present and (2) to assess whether the contralateral lower limb would be a reliable reference for reconstructing the frontal plane alignment.
Methods
Full-leg standing radiographs of 250 volunteers (male, 125; female,125) were reviewed for three alignment parameters (Hip–Knee–Ankle angle (HKA), Femoral Mechanical Angle (FMA) and Tibial Mechanical Angle (TMA)). Evaluation of assumed left-to-right symmetry was performed according to two coronal alignment classifications (HKA subdivisions (HKA) and limb, femoral and tibial phenotypes (HKA, FMA and TMA)). Inter- and within-subject variability was calculated, along with correlations coefficients (r) and coefficients of determination (r2). Reliability of the contralateral limb as a personalized reference to reconstruct the constitutional alignment was investigated by intervals, expanding by 1° increments (0.5° increment both to varus and valgus) around the right knee alignment parameters. Subsequently, it was verified whether or not the left knee parameters fell within this interval.
Results
Symmetrical distribution in coronal alignment was found in 79% (HKA subdivision) and 59% (limb phenotype) of the cohort. Gender differences were present for the most common symmetric limb phenotypes (VARHKA3° (23.2%) in males and NEUHKA0° (38.4%) in females). Inter-subject variability was more prominent than the within-subject side differences for all parameters. Correlations analyses revealed mostly moderate correlations between the alignment measurements. Coefficients of determination showed overall weak left-to-right relationship, except for a moderate predictability for HKA (r2 = 0.538, p < 0.001) and FMA (r2 = 0.618, p < 0.001) in females. FMA and TMA marked weak predictive values for contralateral HKA. Only 60% of left knees were referenced within a 3° interval around the right knee.
Conclusion
No strict left-to-right symmetry was observed in coronal alignment measurements. There is insufficient left-to-right agreement to consider the concept of the contralateral unaffected limb as an idealized reference for frontal plane alignment reconstruction based upon full-leg standing radiographs.
Level of evidence
I.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-020-06152-9/MediaObjects/167_2020_6152_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00167-020-06152-9/MediaObjects/167_2020_6152_Figa_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CT scan:
-
Computed tomography scan
- FMA:
-
Femoral mechanical angle
- HKA:
-
Hip–knee–ankle angle
- ICC:
-
Intra-class correlation coefficient
- mLDFA:
-
Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- OA:
-
Osteoarthritis
- TKA:
-
Total knee arthroplasty
- TMA:
-
Tibial mechanical angle
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
References
Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, Lustig S, Haddad FS (2014) Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Jt J 96:857–862
Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J (2012) The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:45–53
Boonen B, Kerens B, Schotanus MGM, Emans P, Jong B, Kort NP (2016) Inter-observer reliability of measurements performed on digital long-leg standing radiographs and assessment of validity compared to 3D CT-scan. Knee 23:20–24
Bowman A, Shunmugam M, Watts AR, Bramwell DC, Wilson C, Krishnan J (2016) Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of mechanical axis alignment before and after total knee arthroplasty using long leg radiographs. Knee 23:203–208
Colyn W, Agricola R, Arnout N, Verhaar J, Bellemans J (2016) How does lower leg alignment differ between soccer players, other athletes, and non-athletic controls? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3619–3626
Cooke D, Scudamore A, Li J, Wyss U, Bryant T, Costigan P (1997) Axial lower-limb alignment: comparison of knee geometry in normal volunteers and osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil 5:39–47
Dargel J, Feiser J, Gotter M, Pennig D, Koebke J (2009) Side differences in the anatomy of human knee joints. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1368–1376
Eckhoff DG, Jacofsky DJ, Springer BD, Dunbar M, Cherian JJ, Elmallah RK, Mont MA, Greene KA (2016) Bilateral symmetrical comparison of femoral and tibial anatomic features. J Arthroplasty 31:1083–1090
Eckstein F, Müller S, Faber SC, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Putz R (2002) Side differences of knee joint cartilage volume, thickness, and surface area, and correlation with lower limb dominance–an MRI-based study. Osteoarthr Cartil 10:914–921
Fahlman L, Sangeorzan E, Chheda N, Lambright D (2014) Older adults without radiographic knee osteoarthritis: knee alignment and knee range of motion. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 7:1–11
Hess S, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Hirschmann MT (2019) Highly variable coronal tibial and femoral alignment in osteoarthritic knees: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1368–1377
Hirschmann MT, Hess S, Behrend H, Amsler F, Leclercq V, Moser LB (2019) Phenotyping of hip–knee–ankle angle in young non-osteoarthritic knees provides better understanding of native alignment variability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1378–1384
Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclercq V, Hess S (2019) Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1385–1393
Hirschmann MT, Moser LB, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S (2019) Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1394–1402
Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML (2013) Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1000–1007
Howell S, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K, Ghaly L, Hull M (2015) Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop 39:2117–2124
Hsu RWW, Himeno S, Coventry MB, Chao EYS (1990) Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:215–227
Jacquet C, Laumonerie P, LiArno S, Faizan A, Sharma A, Dagneaux L, Ollivier M (2019) Contralateral preoperative templating of lower limbs’ mechanical angles is a reasonable option. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1445–1451
Jang K-M, Park J-H, Chang M, Kim Y, Lee D, Park S, Wang JH (2017) Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Similarity of Right and Left Knee Joints. Knee Surg Relat Res 29:307–315
Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:745–749
Mullaji AB, Shah S, Shetty GM (2017) Mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores limb alignment comparable to that of the unaffected contralateral limb. Acta Orthop 88:70–74
Nedopil AJ, Singh AK, Howell SM, Hull ML (2018) Does calipered kinematically aligned TKA restore native left to right symmetry of the lower limb and improve function? J Arthroplasty 33:398–406
Parratte S, Pagnamo MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2010) Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92(12):2143–2149
Sappey-Marinier E, Batailler C, Swan J, Malatray M, Cheze L, Servien E, Lustig S (2020) Primary osteoarthritic knees have more varus coronal alignment of the femur compared to young non-arthritic knees in a large cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06083-5
Schenk P, Vlachopoulos L, Hingsammer A, Fucentese SF, Fürn- stahl P, (2018) Is the contralateral tibia a reliable template for reconstruction: a three-dimensional anatomy cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2324–2331
Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Cornu O, Bellemans J, Victor J (2017) Bone morphotypes of the varus and valgus knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:393–400
Vandekerckhove P-JTK, Matlovich N, Teeter MG, MacDonald SJ, Howard JL, Lanting BA (2017) The relationship between constitutional alignment and varus osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2873–2879
Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, Bellemans J (2013) Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2325–2330
Victor JMK, Bassens D, Bellemans J, Gürsu S, Dhollander AAM, Verdonk PCM (2014) Constitutional varus does not affect joint line orientation in the coronal plane. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:98–104
Zahn RK, Renner L, Perka C, Hommel H (2019) Weight-bearing radiography depends on limb loading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1470–1476
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LB: Designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, performed the statistical analysis, prepared the manuscript. WC: Performed the radiographic measurements, reviewed the manuscript. JB: Provided the database, analyzed and interpreted the data, reviewed the manuscript. JV: Analyzed and interpreted the data, reviewed the manuscript. PJV: Designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, reviewed the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Lucas Beckers or any member of his or her immediate family has no funding or commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. William Colyn or any member of his or her immediate family has no funding or commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Johan Bellemans or any member of his or her immediate family has no funding or commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Jan Victor or any member of his or her immediate family has no funding or commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Pieter-Jan Vandekerckhove or any member of his or her immediate family has no funding or commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Ethical approval
All investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research and that institutional approval of the human protocol for this investigation was obtained from the Ethics Committee from the University of Leuven (B32220097076).
Informed consent
Informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beckers, L., Colyn, W., Bellemans, J. et al. The contralateral limb is no reliable reference to restore coronal alignment in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 477–487 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06152-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06152-9