Skip to main content
Log in

Surgeon-defined assessment is a poor predictor of knee balance in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, multicenter study

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The accuracy of surgeon-defined assessment (SDA) of soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is poorly understood despite balance being considered a significant determinant of surgical success. The study’s hypothesis was that intra-operative SDA is a poor predictor of coronal balance in TKA.

Methods

A prospective, multicenter study assessing accuracy of SDA of balance was conducted in 250 patients (285 TKAs). Eight surgeons and thirteen trainees participated, and all were blinded to sensor measurements. The primary outcome was test accuracy of SDA measured at 10°, 45° and 90° compared to sensor measures as the gold standard test. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was calculated to determine chance-corrected agreement. Secondary outcomes include the relationship of SDA to level of surgical experience, analysis of between-surgeon differences, and the influence of patient and operative factors on SDA accuracy.

Results

Average accuracy of SDA was 58.3%, 61.2% and 66.5% at 10°, 45° and 90° respectively. Cohen’s kappa coefficient was 0.18 at all angles and rated as “slight agreement”. SDA sensitivities to correctly identify a balanced knee (76.2% at 10°; 82.6% at 45°; 83.2% at 90°) were approximately twice specificities to correctly identify an unbalanced knee (42.6% at 10°; 34.1% at 45°; 41.4% at 90°). Surgical experience (surgeon versus trainee) had no effect on capacity to determine balance. Considerable between-surgeon variability was found (33–65% at 10°, 41–73% at 45°, 55–89% at 90°).

Conclusion

SDA was a poor predictor of balance, particularly when assessing the unbalanced TKA. Surgeon experience had no effect on test accuracy and considerable between-surgeon variability was recorded. These findings question the accuracy of SDA in TKA.

Trial Registration Number: ACTRN# 12618000817246.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chow JC, Breslauer L (2017) The use of intraoperative sensors significantly increases the patient-reported rate of improvement in primary total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 40:e648–e651. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20170503-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Walker SA, Cheal EJ, Stiehl JB (2001) Femoral condylar lift-off in vivo in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:33–39. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.83b1.10632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elmallah RK, Mistry JB, Cherian JJ, Chughtai M, Bhave A, Roche MW et al (2016) Can we really "feel" a balanced total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 31:102–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Golladay GJ, Bradbury TL, Gordon AC, Fernandez-Madrid IJ, Krebs VE, Patel PD et al (2019) Are patients more satisfied with a balanced total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 34:S195–S200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gustke K (2012) Use of smart trials for soft-tissue balancing in total knee replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:147–150. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC, Anderson CR (2014) A new method for defining balance: promising short-term clinical outcomes of sensor-guided TKA. J Arthroplasty 29:955–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Elson LC (2014) Anderson CR (2014) Primary TKA patients with quantifiably balanced soft-tissue achieve significant clinical gains sooner than unbalanced patients. Adv Orthop 2014:628695. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/628695

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gustke KA, Golladay GJ, Roche MW, Jerry GJ, Elson LC, Anderson CR (2014) Increased satisfaction after total knee replacement using sensor-guided technology. Bone Joint J 96-b:1333–1338. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B10.34068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heesterbeek PJC, Haffner N, Wymenga AB, Stifter J, Ritschl P (2017) Patient-related factors influence stiffness of the soft tissue complex during intraoperative gap balancing in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(9):2760–2768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3694-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirschmann MT, Karlsson J, Becker R (2018) Hot topic: alignment in total knee arthroplasty-systematic versus more individualised alignment strategies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1587–1588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4946-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Komistek RD, Math K, Dennis DA, Anderson DT (2002) Correlation between condylar lift-off and femoral component alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200210000-00022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jennings LM, Bell CI, Ingham E, Komistek RD, Stone MH, Fisher J (2007) The influence of femoral condylar lift-off on the wear of artificial knee joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119JEIM215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leah E, Gustke KA, Gregory G, Martin R, Christopher A (2013) Modified MCL release: sensor-guided technique used to quantify intercompartmental balance in TKA. Orthop Proc 95:505–505

    Google Scholar 

  14. Linnet K, Bossuyt PM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB (2012) Quantifying the accuracy of a diagnostic test or marker. Clin Chem 58:1292–1301. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.182543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB (2014) Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant? Bone Joint J 96-b:101–104. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MacDessi SJ, Bhimani A, Burns AWR, Chen DB, Leong AKL, Molnar RB et al (2019) Does soft tissue balancing using intraoperative pressure sensors improve clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty? A protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 9:e027812. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027812

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. MacDessi SJ, Gharaibeh MA, Harris IA (2019) How accurately can soft tissue balance be determined in total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 34(290–294):e291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manning WA, Blain A, Longstaff L, Deehan DJ (2019) A load-measuring device can achieve fine-tuning of mediolateral load at knee arthroplasty but may lead to a more lax knee state. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(7):2238–2250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5164-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S, Callaghan JJ, Saleh KJ (2006) Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000214421.21712.62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roche M, Elson L, Anderson C (2014) Dynamic soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin N Am 45:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2013.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanz-Pena I, Zapata GE, Verstraete MA, Meere PA, Walker PS (2019) Relationship between ligament forces and contact forces in balancing at total knee surgery. J Arthroplasty 34:1261–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schnaser E, Lee YY, Boettner F, Gonzalez Della Valle A (2015) The position of the patella and extensor mechanism affects intraoperative compartmental loads during total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study using intraoperative sensing to guide soft tissue balance. J Arthroplasty 30(1348–1353):e1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME et al (2013) Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 28:116–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Song SJ, Kang SG, Lee YJ, Kim KI, Park CH (2018) An intraoperative load sensor did not improve the early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(5):1671–1679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-108-5314-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson R, Novikov D, Cizmic Z, Feng JE, Fideler K, Sayeed Z et al (2019) Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Orthop Clin N Am 50:269–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2019.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Linde JA, Beath KJ, Leong AKL (2018) The reliability of sensor-assisted soft tissue measurements in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vandekerckhove PTK, Teeter MG, Naudie DDR, Howard JL, MacDonald SJ, Lanting BA (2017) The impact of coronal plane alignment on polyethylene wear and damage in total knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study. J Arthroplasty 32:2012–2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Viera AJ, Garrett JM (2005) Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 37:360–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wylde V, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID, Dieppe P (2011) Persistent pain after joint replacement: prevalence, sensory qualities, and postoperative determinants. Pain 152:566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Mr Giovanni Porcella for his assistance with data collection and data entry. We also thank Mr Rick Moore and the Smith & Nephew team for their support of this project. We are appreciative of grants received from OrthoSensor, USA and Ramsay Hospital Research Foundation, Australia to support this research. Lastly, we are grateful to the Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Australia for administering the funding for this study.

SENSOR BALANCE Study Group: Aziz Bhimani (Wollongong Private Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia), Alexander W. R. Burns (Canberra Private Hospital, Deakin, ACT, Australia, Calvary John James Private Hospital, Deakin, ACT, Australia), Darren B. Chen (Sydney Knee Specialists, Kogarah NSW, Australia, St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia, The Canterbury Hospital, Campsie, NSW, Australia), Ashish D. Diwan (St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of NSW, Kogarah, NSW, Australia, St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia), Ian A. Harris (Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia, South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia), Anthony K. L. Leong (Wollongong Private Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, Kareena Private Hospital, Caringbah, NSW, Australia), Samuel J. MacDessi (Sydney Knee Specialists, Kogarah NSW, Australia, St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of NSW, Kogarah, NSW, Australia, St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia, The Canterbury Hospital, Campsie, NSW, Australia), Robert B Molnar (St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia, Sutherland Hospital, Caringbah, NSW, Australia), Jonathan S. Mulford (Calvary St Luke’s Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia), Richard M Walker (Sydney Southwest Private Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia, Fairfield Hospital, Prairiewood, NSW, Australia), Jil A Wood (Sydney Knee Specialists, Kogarah NSW, Australia)

Funding

This study was supported by grants from OrthoSensor (Dania Beach, FL, USA) and Ramsay Hospital Research Foundation (Sydney, Australia). Smith & Nephew provided the sensor inserts at no additional cost to patients. Grants were held in a dedicated research account and administered through the Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research (Liverpool, NSW).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel J. MacDessi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of SENSOR BALANCE Study Group and their affiliations are listed in Acknowledgements section.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacDessi, S.J., Wood, J.A., Diwan, A.D. et al. Surgeon-defined assessment is a poor predictor of knee balance in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, multicenter study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 498–506 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05925-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05925-6

Keywords

Navigation