Skip to main content
Log in

New Approximation Assisted Multi-objective collaborative Robust Optimization (new AA-McRO) under interval uncertainty

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing collaborative optimization techniques with multiple coupled subsystems are predominantly focused on single-objective deterministic optimization. However, many engineering optimization problems have system and subsystems that can each be multi-objective, constrained and with uncertainty. The literature reports on a few deterministic Multi-objective Multi-Disciplinary Optimization (MMDO) techniques. However, these techniques in general require a large number of function calls and their computational cost can be exacerbated when uncertainty is present. In this paper, a new Approximation-Assisted Multi-objective collaborative Robust Optimization (New AA-McRO) under interval uncertainty is presented. This new AA-McRO approach uses a single-objective optimization problem to coordinate all system and subsystem multi-objective optimization problems in a Collaborative Optimization (CO) framework. The approach converts the consistency constraints of CO into penalty terms which are integrated into the system and subsystem objective functions. The new AA-McRO is able to explore the design space better and obtain optimum design solutions more efficiently. Also, the new AA-McRO obtains an estimate of Pareto optimum solutions for MMDO problems whose system-level objective and constraint functions are relatively insensitive (or robust) to input uncertainties. Another characteristic of the new AA-McRO is the use of online approximation for objective and constraint functions to perform system robustness evaluation and subsystem-level optimization. Based on the results obtained from a numerical and an engineering example, it is concluded that the new AA-McRO performs better than previously reported MMDO methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn J, Kwon JH (2006) An efficient strategy for reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization using BLISS. Struct Multidisc Optim 31(7):363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison JT, Kokkolaras M, Papalambros PY (2009) Optimal partitioning and coordination decisions in decomposition-based design optimization. J Mech Des 131(10):081008-1–081008-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Aute V, Azarm S (2006) A genetic algorithms based approach for multidisciplinary multiobjective collaborative optimization. In: Proceedings of the 11th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. Portsmouth, VA

  • Azarm S, Li WC (1988) A two level decomposition method for design optimization. Eng Optim 13:211–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balling RJ, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1996) Optimization of coupled systems: a critical overview of approaches. AIAA J 34(1):6–17

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Braun R, Kroo I (1996) Development and application of the collaborative optimization architecture in a multidisciplinary design environment. In: Alexandrov N, Hussaini M (eds) Multidisciplinary design optimization: state-of-the-Art, SIAM

  • Cramer E, Dennis J, Frank P, Lewis R, Shubin G (1994) Problem formulation for multidisciplinary optimization. SIAM J Optim 4:754–776

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Ltd, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel A, Murray W (2006) A local convergence analysis of bilevel decomposition algorithms. Optim Eng 7(2):99–133

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elishakoff I, Haftka RT, Fang J (1994) Structural design under bounded uncertainty—optimization with anti-optimization. Comput Struct 53(8):1401–1405

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley

  • Gu X, Renaud JE, Penninger CL (2006) Implicit uncertainty propagation for robust collaborative optimization. J Mech Des 128(4):1001–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawan S, Azarm S, Wu J, Boyars A (2003) Quality-assisted multi-objective multidisciplinary genetic algorithms. AIAA J 41(11):1752–1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu W, Azarm S, Almansoori A (2010) Approximation assisted multi-objective collaborative robust optimization (AA-McRO) under interval uncertainty. 13th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference. Forth worth, TX

  • Hu W, Li M, Azarm S, Almansoori A (2011) Improving multi-objective robust optimization under interval uncertainty using online approximation and constraint cuts. J Mech Des 133(8):061002-1–061002-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang BS, Yang YS, Jung HS, Yeun YS (2005) Managing approximation models in collaborative optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 30(1):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HM, Michelena NF, Papalambros PY, Jiang T (2003) Target cascading in optimal system design. J Mech Des 125(3):474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler JR, Owen AB (1996) Computer experiments. Handbook of statistics. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 261–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokkolaras M, Mourelatos ZP, Papalambros PY (2006) Design optimization of hierarchically decomposed multilevel systems under uncertainty. J Mech Des 128(2):503–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroo I, Manning V (2000) Collaborative optimization: status and directions. In: Proceedings of the 8th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Long Beach, CA

  • Li M, Azarm S (2008) Multiobjective collaborative robust optimization with interval uncertainty and interdisciplinary uncertainty propagation. J Mech Des 130(10):081402-1–081402-11

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Hamel J, Azarm S (2010) Optimal uncertainty reduction for multi-disciplinary multi-output systems using sensitivity analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 40:77–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB (2011) MATLAB and simulink for technical computing. Mathworks, Version 2011a

  • McAllister CD, Simpson TW, Hacker K, Lewis K, Messac A (2005) Integrating linear physical programming within collaborative optimization for multiobjective multidisciplinary design optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 29(3):178–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renaud JE, Gabriele GA (1993) Improved coordination in nonhierarchic system optimization. AIAA J 31(14):2367–2373

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roth BD, Kroo IM (2008) Enhanced collaborative optimization: a decomposition-based method for multidisciplinary design. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conferences. Brooklyn, NY

  • Simpson TW, Korte JJ, Mauery TM, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39(14):2233–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1982) A linear decomposition method for large optimization problem - blueprint for development. NASA TM 83248

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (1998) Optimization by decomposition: a step from hierarchic to non-hierarchic systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd NASA/Air force symposium on recent advances in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. Hampton, VA

  • Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J, Agte J, Sandusky JR (2000) Bi-level integrated system synthesis (BLISS). AIAA J 38(1):164–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobieski IP, Manning VM, Kroo IM (1998) Response surface estimation and refinement in collaborative optimization. In: Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO symposium multidisciplinary analysis and optimization. St. Louis, MO

  • Tappeta RV, Renaud JE (1997) Multiobjective collaborative optimization. J Mech Des 119(3):403–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosserams S, Etman LFP, Rooda JE (2009) A classification of methods for distributed system optimization based on formulation structure. Struct Multidisc Optim 39(7):503–517

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Azarm S (2001) Metrics for quality assessment of a multiobjective design optimization solution set. J Mech Des 123(1):18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh P, Toropov V, Wood A (2009) Metamodel-based collaborative optimization framework. Struct Multidisc Optim 38(2):103–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper was supported in part by The Petroleum Institute (PI), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, as part of the Education and Energy Research Collaboration (EERC) agreement between the PI and University of Maryland, College Park. The work was also supported in part by an ONR grant. Such support does not constitute an endorsement by the funding agency of the opinions expressed in the paper. A previous version of this paper was presented at the 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Fort Worth, TX (Hu et al. 2010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shapour Azarm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, W., Azarm, S. & Almansoori, A. New Approximation Assisted Multi-objective collaborative Robust Optimization (new AA-McRO) under interval uncertainty. Struct Multidisc Optim 47, 19–35 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0816-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-012-0816-2

Keywords

Navigation