Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Der minimal-invasive anteriore Zugang

Minimally invasive anterior approach

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Orthopäde Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 25 November 2012

Zusammenfassung

Der minimal-invasive anteriore Zugang für die Implantation einer Hüftprothese wurde 1985 erstmals publiziert. Seither wurde die Technik weiterentwickelt und die Indikationsstellung erweitert. Der Zugang nutzt die Muskellücke zwischen dem M. tensor fasciae latae lateral und dem M. sartorius medial. Diese Muskellücke ermöglicht einen direkten und schnellen Zugang zum Hüftgelenk unter Schonung der Muskulatur. Bei der Präparation des Femurs besteht jedoch die Gefahr der Schädigung des M. tensor fasciae latae. Ebenfalls gefährdet ist der N. cutaneus fermoris lateralis (NCFL), dessen Äste oder Hauptstamm beim Hautschnitt und bei der Dissektion des Subkutangewebes durchtrennt werden können. In diesem Artikel werden Technik, Risiken sowie die bisherigen klinischen Ergebnisse der Hüftprothesenimplantation über den minimal-invasiven anterioren Zugang dargestellt. Die Ergebnisse der Literatur seit 2005 und auch die eigenen Ergebnisse werden diskutiert. Bei der Durchsicht der Literatur wurde insbesondere auf die Inzidenz einer Läsion des NCFL, auf eine Muskelschädigung des M. tensor fasciae latae sowie auf die Positionierung der Hüftpfanne geachtet. Letztere ist aufgrund der geringeren Übersicht bei der minimal-invasiven Technik erschwert.

Abstract

The minimally invasive direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) was first published in 1985. Since then the technique has been further improved and the indications have been extended. The approach utilizes the muscle gap between the tensor fasciae latae muscle on the lateral side and the sartorius muscle on the medial side. This muscle gap allows a direct and quick approach to the hip joint with good muscle preservation. During preparation of the femur the tensor fasciae latae muscle is at risk of being damaged. The lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh (NCFL) and its branches are also in danger of being damaged during skin incision and dissection of the subcutaneous tissue. In this article the technique, risks and current clinical results of THA using the minimally invasive direct anterior approach are described. The results from the literature, as well as own results are compared to the traditional transgluteal lateral Bauer approach and discussed. Reviewing the literature, special attention has been given to the incidence of NCFL lesions, damage of the tensor fasciae latae muscle and positioning of the cup. Especially for the latter, the general view is hindered in the minimally invasive technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Hueter C (1883) Fünfte Abteilung: Die Verletzung und Krankeiten des Hüftgelenkes, neunundzwanzigstes Kapitel. In: Hueter C (Hrsg) Grundriss der Chirurgie. Vogel, Leipzig, S 129–200

  2. Smith-Petersen M (1917) A new supra-articular subperiosteal approeach to the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 15:592–595

    Google Scholar 

  3. Judet J, Judet R (1950) The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 32-B:166–173

    Google Scholar 

  4. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 46:1615–1646

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pemberton PA (1965) Pericapsular osteotomy of the ilium for treatment of congenital subluxation and dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 47:65–86

    Google Scholar 

  6. Salter RB (1978) The classic. Innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip by Robert B. Salter, J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 43-B:518

  7. Smith-Petersen M (1949) Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 31:40–46

    Google Scholar 

  8. Judet J, Judet H (1985) Anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Presse Med 14:1031–1033

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matta JM, Siebenrock KA, Gautier E et al (1997) Hip fusion through an anterior approach with the use of a ventral plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res (337):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rachbauer F, Krismer M (2008) Minimalinvasive Hüftendoprothetik über den anterioren Zugang. Oper Orthop Traumatol 20:239–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holzapfel BM, Burklein D, Greimel F et al (2011) Hüftendoprothetik bei kongenitaler Dysplasie. Anatomische Besonderheiten und technische Stolpersteine. Orthopade 40:543–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oinuma K, Eingartner C, Saito Y, Shiratsuchi H (2007) Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:310–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bender B, Nogler M, Hozack WJ (2009) Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 40:321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennon RE, Keggi JM, Wetmore RS et al (2003) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 85-A(Suppl 4):39–48

  15. Bhandari M, Matta JM, Dodgin D et al (2009) Outcomes following the single-incision anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study. Orthop Clin North Am 40:329–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K et al (2009) A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 24:698–704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rachbauer F (2005) Minimal-invasive Hüftendoprothetik über einen direkten vorderen Zugang. Orthopade 34:1103–1104, 1106–1108, 1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seng BE, Berend KR, Ajluni AF, Lombardi AV Jr (2009) Anterior-supine minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: defining the learning curve. Orthop Clin North Am 40:343–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bal BS, Vallurupalli S (2008) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with the anterior approach. Indian J Orthop 42:301–308

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Masonis J, Thompson C, Odum S (2008) Safe and accurate: learning the direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 31(12 Suppl 2):pii

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mast NH, Munoz M, Matta J (2009) Simultaneous bilateral supine anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of early complications and short-term rehabilitation. Orthop Clin North Am 40:351–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Woolson ST, Pouliot MA, Huddleston JI (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table: short-term results from a community hospital. J Arthroplasty 24:999–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhargava T, Goytia RN, Jones LC, Hungerford MW (2010) Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve impairment after direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 33(7):472

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wayne N, Stoewe R (2009) Primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the lateral Hardinge approach to an anterior mini-invasive approach. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 1:e27

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maffiuletti NA, Impellizzeri FM, Widler K et al (2009) Spatiotemporal parameters of gait after total hip replacement: anterior versus posterior approach. Orthop Clin North Am 40:407–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ (2010) Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:671–679 e671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jewett BA, Collis DK (2011) High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:503–507

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alecci V, Valente M, Crucil M et al (2011) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings. J Orthop Traumatol 12(3):123–129

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ et al (2011) Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 93:1392–1398

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goebel S, Steinert AF, Schillinger J et al (2011) Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach. Int Orthop 36(3):491–948

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Berry DJ (2005) „Minimally invasive“ total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87:699–700

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R et al (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  33. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Hozack WJ (2006) Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:293–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Matsuura M, Ohashi H, Okamoto Y et al (2010) Elevation of the femur in ZHA through a direct anterior approach. Cadaver and clinical studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(12): 3201–3206

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopädische Klinik König-Ludwig-Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie der Universität Würzburg, Brettreichstr. 11, 97074, Würzburg, Deutschland

    U. Nöth MHBA, A. Nedopil, B.M. Holzapfel, M. Koppmair, S. Goebel, J. Eulert & M. Rudert

  2. Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Franziskus-Hospital Harderberg, Harderberg, Deutschland

    O. Rolf

Authors
  1. U. Nöth MHBA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Nedopil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B.M. Holzapfel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Koppmair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O. Rolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Goebel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Eulert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. Rudert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Nöth MHBA.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00132-012-2030-8

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nöth, U., Nedopil, A., Holzapfel, B. et al. Der minimal-invasive anteriore Zugang. Orthopäde 41, 390–398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-011-1894-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-011-1894-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation