Skip to main content
Log in

High Complication Rate With Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasties on a Fracture Table

  • Symposium: Papers Presented at the Hip Society Meetings
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Abstract

Background

Recent attention in THA has focused on minimally invasive techniques and their short-term outcomes. Despite much debate over the outcomes and complications of the two-incision and the mini-lateral and mini-posterior approaches, complications arising from use of the anterior THA on a fracture table are not well documented.

Questions/purposes

We determined the intraoperative and postoperative complications with the anterior approach to THA through an extended single-surgeon patient series.

Methods

We reviewed 800 primary THAs performed anteriorly with the aid of a fracture table over 5 years and recorded all intraoperative and postoperative complications up to latest followup (average, 1.8 years; range, 0–5 years). Patients with severe acetabular deformity or severe flexion contractures were excluded and those surgeries were performed with a lateral approach during the time period of this study.

Results

Intraoperative complications included 19 trochanteric fractures, three femoral perforations, one femoral fracture, one acetabular fracture, one bleeding complication, and one case of cardiovascular collapse. There were no ankle fractures. Postoperative complications included seven patients with dislocations; seven with deep infections; one with delayed femur fracture; 37 with wound complications, among which 13 had reoperation for local débridement; 14 with deep venous thrombosis; and two with pulmonary embolism; and 31 other nonfatal medical complications.

Conclusions

The main intraoperative complications of trochanteric fractures and perforations occurred mostly early in the series, while the main postoperative complications related to wound healing were prevalent throughout the entire series. Despite potential advantages of use of a fracture table, surgeons should be aware of the potential complications of trochanteric fractures, perforations, and wound-healing problems associated with this technique.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Collaborative Investigators; Bhandari M, Matta JM, Dodgin D, Clark C, Kregor P, Bradley G, Little L. Outcomes following the single incision anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter observational study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:329–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:2432–2438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barton C, Kim PR. Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:371–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger RA, Duwelius PJ. The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:163–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, Kahn B, Cahill J, Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:139–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Trick LW, Brothers JC, Jones RE, Vise GT, Gruen TA. Primary total hip arthroplasty with use of the modular S-ROM prosthesis: four to seven year clinical and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1707–1716.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clohisy JC, Harris WH. The Harris-Galante porous coated acetabular component with screw fixation: an average ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:66–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Duwelius PJ, Burkhart RL, Hayhurst JO, Moller H, Butler JB. Comparison of the 2-incision and mini-incision posterior total hip arthroplasty technique: a retrospective match-pair controlled study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:48–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:153–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopedic fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:115–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Brien DA, Rorabeck CH. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O’Brien S, Beverland D. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:701–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:86–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 2, Pt 1):50–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rachbauer F, Kain MSH, Leunig M. The history of the anterior approach to the hip. Orthop Clin N Am. 2009;40:311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sculco TP, Boettner F. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the posterior approach. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:205–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:164–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ. Comparison of primary total hip replacements with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1353–1358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Woolson ST, Pouliot MA, Huddleston JI. Primary total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach and a fracture table: short term results from a community hospital. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:999–1005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Crystal Mills, Coordinator for Slocum Research & Education Foundation, for her efforts in support of the project and manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian A. Jewett MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Jewett, B.A., Collis, D.K. High Complication Rate With Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasties on a Fracture Table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 503–507 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1568-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1568-1

Keywords

Navigation