Skip to main content
Log in

Engineering Discovery Learning: The Contingency Adduction of Some Precursors of Textual Responding in a Beginning Reading Program

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A learning situation in which the principal content of what is to be learned is not given but is independently discovered by the learner is often considered “discovery learning.” Recently, learning scientists have been able to make explicit some of the conditions under which such independent discovery is likely to occur (Andronis, 1983; Epstein, 1996; Johnson & Layng, 1992). One form of “discovery” can often be observed when skills learned under one set of conditions are recruited under new conditions to serve a new or different function—a process of “contingency adduction” (Andronis, Layng, & Goldiamond, 1997). The research reported here investigated the application of contingency adduction in a discovery learning context to establish sound-to-letter correspondence as part of an online reading/decoding program, Headsprout Early Reading. Beginning readers acquired novel letters/sounds correspondence with minimal presentations and few errors—often requiring only one presentation. This research suggests that instructional sequences may be designed to provide effective discovery learning activities to teach some phonics skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andronis, P. T. (1983). A novelform of aggression by pigeons: Contingency coadduction. Dissertation, The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andronis, P. T., Layng, T. V. J., & Goldiamond, I. (1997). Contingency adduction of “symbolic aggression” by pigeons. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 5–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski, J. (1978). The origins of knowledge and imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. (1999). Discovery Learning (Updated January 22, 2000) http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/history/history.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, R. (1996). Cognition, creativity, and behavior: Select essays. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldiamond, I. & Thompson, D. (1968, reprinted 2004). The functional analysis of behavior. P. T. Andronis (Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.

  • Johnson, K. R., & Layng, T. V. J. (1992). Breaking the structuralist barrier: Literacy and numeracy with fluency. American Psychologist, 47, 1475–1490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Layng, T. V. J. (1991). A selectionist approach to verbal behavior: Sources of variation. In L. J. Hayes, & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 146–150). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layng, T. V. J. (1995). Causation and complexity: Old lessons, new crusades. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 26,3, 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layng, T. V. J., & Andronis, P. T. (1984). Toward a functional analysis of delusional speech and hallucinatory behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 139–156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Layng, T. V. J., Twyman, J. S., and Stikeleather, G. (2004). Selected for success: How Headsprout Reading Basics™ teaches beginning reading. In D.J. Moran & R. Malott (Eds.) Evidenced-based educational methods. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Science/Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S. B., & McCormick, S. (2002). A case for single subject experiments in literacy research. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.) Methods of literacy research (pp. 105–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, P. H. (1957). Innate motor-action as a basis of learning: Manipulative patterns in the chimpanzee. In P. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 264–287). New York: International Universities Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stikeleather, G. & Sidman, M. (1990). An instance of spurious equivalence relations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 1–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Twyman, J. S., Layng, T. V. J., Stikeleather, G., & Hobbins, K. A. (2004). A non-linear approach to curriculum design: The role of behavior analysis in building an effective reading program. In W. L. Heward et al. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education, Vol. 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. V. Joe Layng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Layng, T.V.J., Twyman, J.S. & Stikeleather, G. Engineering Discovery Learning: The Contingency Adduction of Some Precursors of Textual Responding in a Beginning Reading Program. Analysis Verbal Behav 20, 99–109 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392997

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392997

Navigation