Abstract
Odontotermes formosanus (Shiraki), a black-winged subterranean termite, is a common forest pest. A red pigment-producing bacterial strain isolated from the termite was identified as Serratia marcescens and named SM1. A bioassay of SM1 on O. formosanus show that the LD50 ranged from 1.77 × 104 to 10.82 × 104 cells/termite over 21–39 h. Three biological control agents, Beauveria bassiana (2 × 1010 cells/mL), Metarhizium anisopliae (1 × 1010 cells/mL) and Bacillus thuringiensis (1.6 × 108 IU/mL), were used for an O. formosanus bioassay. The results show that the insecticidal effect of B. bassiana was stronger than that of M. anisopliae. In addition, two mixtures were obtained by combining B. bassiana (2 × 1010 cells/mL) with SM1 (1.5 × 1010 cells/mL), and M. anisopliae (1 × 1010 cells/mL) with S. marcescens (SM1) (1.5 × 1010 cells/mL) in equal volumes. The results show that B. bassiana and SM1 was less effective than SM1 alone. However, the insecticidal effect of M. anisopliae and SM1 was better than that of M. anisopliae or SM1 individually. These studies provide an important contribution for termite biocontrol.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Current control methods for Odontotermes formosanus (Shiraki) rely mainly on chemical treatments, including spraying liquid chemicals, feeding bait, dusting and grouting. The active ingredients in these chemicals are synthetic organic pesticides that present different levels of threat to soil, water and the human body. Therefore, alternative, environmentally friendly termite control agents such as biological control agents need to be developed (Liang et al. 2012). An active bacteria strain isolated from O. formosanus, was identified as Serratia marcescens (SM1) (Fu et al. 2019).
S. marcescens, is a Gram-negative bacterium and an important member of the Enterobacteriaceae. It can effectively control a number of pests and pathogenic bacteria in the field of biological control (Babashpour et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2013) and can also enhance plant resistance to pathogenic bacteria (Nobutaka et al. 2005; Lavania et al. 2006; Chakraborty et al. 2010; Ting et al. 2010). In recent years, it has been found that S. marcescens has insecticidal properties. Liu et al. (1988) found it in diseased planthoppers. Wang et al. (2010) isolated a strain of S. marcescens, KI3, which showed an obvious toxic effect to aphids. In addition, a strain of S. marcescens isolated from the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner, had a strong pathogenicity and control on H. armigera, on the cabbage white worm, Pieris rapae L. and beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Chen et al. 2001). The development and utilization of S. marcescens bacterial strains and their mechanism of action on plant pests has attracted increasing attention from researchers worldwide. However, the application of S. marcescens to O. formosanus has not yet been studied.
Mixing pesticides may increase their toxicity, and the combined use of different bacteria may also increase the preventive effects of pesticide treatment. Yin et al. (2004) found that chitinase enzymes produced by S. marcescens hydrolyze chitin in the midgut peritrophic membranes of locusts and perforate intestinal membranes, which makes insecticidal proteins of S. marcescens more likely to penetrate into the insect body and destroy the digestive tract, thereby greatly improving the insecticidal effect on the locusts. At the same time, chitinases produced by S. marcescens also cause significant damage to allow other pathogens to invade locusts and increase the infection and fatality rates. Chitinases that is beneficial for Bt infection have a synergistic effect on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) (Sampson and Gooday 1998). In addition, Liu et al. (1988) reported a synergizing effect from the mixed use of S. marcescens and B. thuringiensis strain HD-1. However, the toxicity of S. marcescens to O. formosanus has not been reported. Therefore, the SM1 strain of S. marcescens, which we isolated and identified, was used to (1) determine the degree of toxicity to O. formosanus; and, (2) determine whether the toxicity of the mixture increased after S. marcescens was mixed with other biological control agents.
Materials and methods
Isolation and culture of the S. marcescens strain, SM1
S. marcescens strain SM1 was isolated from infected O. formosanus and was deposited at Nanjing Forestry University in Nanjing, China. Solid bacterial medium (1 L) consists of peptone 10 g, beef extract 20 g, NaCl 2 g, K2HPO4 2 g, agar 18 g and H2O 1 L, pH 7.2–7.4.; Seed medium (1 L) consists of peptone 10 g, yeast extract 20 g, NaCl 2 g, K2HPO4 2 g and H2O 1 L; Zymotic medium (1 L) consists of peptone 10 g, soybean oil 30 g, NaCl 2 g, K2HPO4 2 g and H2O 1 L. The isolated SM1 strain was cultured on solid media without light at 27 °C. A single colony was isolated, placed in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL sterilized seed medium and incubated for 12 h at 30 °C and 200 r/min. The 70 mL seed solution was added to 250 mL zymotic medium and cultured in a shaking incubator at a rotational speed of 200 r/min at 30 °C for 36 h (Zhang et al. 2015).
Insects
Eight colonies of O. formosanus were collected from Jurong County in Zhenjiang, Jiangsu Province and kept in sealed plastic containers in total darkness at 27 ± 1 °C and 75 ± 1% relative humidity. All colonies were maintained under laboratory conditions without soil and with moist filter paper for 1 day before treatments.
Determination and dilution of the concentration of SM1
The zymotic medium was used as stock liquid and diluted and quantified. A drop of the bacterial liquid was used to fill the counting area made up of 25 squares, and the number of bacteria in five squares (upper left, lower left, upper right, lower right and centre) was counted according to their diagonal position.
Calculation formula:
where, (The number of bacteria in the five squares)/5 is the average number of bacteria in the five middle squares (pink), and N/5 × 25 the total number of bacteria in the center (i.e., the total number of bacteria in 0.1 mm3). N/5 × 25 × 10 is the total number of bacteria in 1 mm3, and N/5 × 25 × 10 × 106 the total number of bacteria in 1 L.
The concentration of the stock liquor was 1.5 × 1010 cells/mL, diluted to 10, 102, 103 and 104 to obtain 1.5 × 109, 1.5 × 108, 1.5 × 107 and 1.5 × 106 cells/mL.
Source and concentration of three biological agents
Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae were obtained from Yancheng Shenwei Microbiological Strain Technology Co. Ltd., and B. thuringiensis from Hubei Kangxin Agricultural Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The three were diluted as suspensions so that B. bassiana was 2 × 1010 cells/mL, M. anisopliae 1 × 1010 cells/mL and B. thuringiensis 1.6 × 108 IU/mL.
Bioassay of O. formosanus with SM1 and three biological agents
Ten O. formosanus workers of similar size were placed in a 7-cm petri dish on a wet filter paper. A 0.12 μL quantity of the different concentrations of biocontrol agents was titrated on the pronotum of each worker; 0.12 μL water was titrated as the control. Each experiment was repeated three times and mortality was observed and recorded every hour in the dark at 27 °C. When the mortality rate of the control group was approximately 20%, the experiment was concluded.
To study the combination of the two biological agents and SM1, another ten O. formosanus workers of similar size were placed in a 7-cm petri dish, on wet filter paper, and B. bassiana (2 × 1010 cells/mL) or M. anisopliae (1 × 1010 cells/mL) mixed with SM1 (1.5 × 1010 cells/mL) (volume ratio = 1:1). The same method was used for the bioassay experiments. Each experiment was repeated three times and mortality recorded hourly in the dark at 27 °C. When the mortality rate of the control group was approximately 20%, the experiment ended.
Statistical analysis
Data were processed by DPS 4.5 software and LD50 with a 95% confidence interval was obtained. The data were subjected to analysis of variance using InStat software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA) with significance defined as P < 0.05.
Results
Determination of SM1 toxicity to O. formosanus
The bioassay results show that SM1 clearly affected O. formosanus, and the higher the concentration, the greater the toxicity. In addition, the longer the processing time of SM1, the stronger the toxic effect. The LD50 of SM1 at 24 h was 6.66 × 104 cells/termite, and at 39 h 1.77 × 104 cells/termite (Table 1).
Toxicity of B. bassiana, M. anisopliae and B. thuringiensis to O. formosanus
Comparing the titration results for these three biological agents, toxicity levels of the B. bassiana (2 × 1010 cells/mL) and M. anisopliae (1 × 1010 cells/mL) were significantly different from the control. B. bassiana and M. anisopliae were more toxic to O. formosanus; B. thuringiensis (1.6 × 108 IU/mL) was not different from the controls, i.e., there was no toxicity (Table 2).
Comparing the effects of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae over 48 to 84 h, the mortality rate with B. bassiana reached 50% about 48 h, while it required 84 h for the mortality rate with M. anisopliae to reach 50%. B. bassiana needed approximately 72 h and M. anisopliae approximately 96 h to achieve an 80% mortality rate. Therefore, B. bassiana had a stronger insecticidal effect on O. formosanus than M. anisopliae (Table 2).
Toxicity of combined biological agents to O. formosanus
The results of the bioassay of the combined biological agents showed that the mixture of B. bassiana (2 × 1010 cells/mL) and SM1 (1.5 × 1010 cells/mL) was less effective than using SM1 alone. The effect of the mixture of M. anisopliae (1 × 1010 cells/mL) and SM1 (1.5 × 1010 cells/mL) on O. formosanus was better than the components used separately. It required 30 h to kill 80% of the O. formosanus using only SM1, but only 26 h with the mixture of SM1 and M. anisopliae (Table 3).
Discussion
Control of O. formosanus is mainly through chemical means and the effective components of pesticides are synthetic organic compounds. These compounds present different degrees of toxicity levels to soils, water and to humans. Although development of the practical application of biological controls is progressing slowly, its environmental and pollution-free characteristics suggest that it could be the principal method for controlling O. formosanus in the future.
S. marcescens is a naturally occurring ubiquitous bacteria and pathogenic to insects. In recent years, numerous studies have been carried out on S. marcescens from various infected insects (e.g. H. armigera, P. rapae, and S. exigua) and significant progress has been made (Liu et al. 1988; Chen et al. 2001; Wang et al. 2010). However, the study of S. marcescens for O. formosanus control has not been reported previously. The strain SM1 was extracted from O. formosanus infected by S. marcescens, and toxicity assays with SM1 were carried out. The results show that the SM1 has an obvious toxic effect.
Of the current biological pesticides for O. formosanus control, B. bassiana, M. anisopliae and B. thuringiensis were selected to treat O. formosanus with 2 × 1010 cells/ml B. bassiana, 1 × 1010 cells/mL M. anisopliae and 1.6 × 108 IU/mL B. thuringiensis. B. bassiana and M. anisopliae were more toxic. B. bassiana achieved 80% mortality after 72 h, and M. anisopliae 80% after 96 h. These biological control agents can be used in the prevention and control of O. formosanus at the early stage of infestation.
The effects of combined biological agents on O. formosanus have also not been reported before. In this study, B. bassiana (2 × 1010 cells/mL) and M. anisopliae (1 × 1010 cells/mL), which had good toxic effects to O. formosanus, were combined with SM1 (1.5 × 1010 cells/mL). The toxicity of the combination of B. bassiana and SM1 was lower than that of SM1 alone, but the toxicity of the combination of M. anisopliae and SM1 was higher than that of SM1 alone. These results show that different biological agents, when combined into different formulations, will produce different results. Therefore, laboratory experiments must be undertaken to choose suitable combinations of biological agents to avoid antagonism between agents.
This study showed that the S. marcescens strain SM1 was significantly toxic to O. formosanus, but the specific components and mechanisms of this effect need to be further examined. Research has shown that the pathogenesis of S. marcescens is mainly due to chitinase enzymes (Regev et al. 1996; Zhang et al. 2000; Xu and Peng 2004; Yin et al. 2004; Jin et al. 2005), and Tao (2006) has shown that the insecticidal protein of S. marcescens is a metallic protein that exists in the supernatant of the bacteria. At the same time, both the living bacteria of S. marcescens and its secretions are toxic to insects (Yang et al. 2012, 2015). Therefore, a titration experiment on O. formosanus using the different constituents of S. marcescens fermentation will be carried out in a follow-up study.
Based on this study of the S. marcescens strain SM1, this bacterium has considerable potential for the biological control of O. formosanus and needs further study. In addition, this experiment includes only an indoor bioassay of the S. marcescens strain SM1, while the control effects of SM1 on an entire colony have not been studied and should be the subject of future research.
References
Babashpour S, Aminzadeh S, Farrokhi N, Karkhane A, Haghbeen K (2012) Characterization of a chitinase (Chit62) from Serratia marcescens B4A and its efficacy as a bioshield against plant fungal pathogens. Biochem Genet 50:722–735
Chen XW, Fan H, Chen R, Yu XJ, Lan HX, Sun BZ (2001) Study of the pathogenicity on pests and the utility in fields of Serratia marcescens. J Tianjin Agric Coll 8:28–30 (in Chinese)
Chakraborty U, Chakraborty BN, Chakraborty AP (2010) Influence of Serratia marcescens TRS-1 on growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis against Fomes lamaoensis. J Plant Interact 5:261–272
Fu RJ, Qi XR, Feng K, Xia XR, Tang F (2019) Identification and characteristics of a strain of Serratia marcescens isolated from the termites, Odontotermes formosanus. J Nanjing For Univ Nat Sci Ed 43(1):76–82 (in Chinese)
Jin H, Ge SR, Tao Y, Ran HY, Liu SG (2005) Identification of a pathogenic strain of locusts and its toxicity and pathology. Acta Microbiol Sin 45:172–176 (in Chinese)
Lavania M, Chauhan PS, Chauhan SV, Nautiyal CS (2006) Induction of plant defense enzymes and phenolics by treatment with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Serratia marcescens NBRI1213. Curr Microbiol 52:363–368
Liang YY, Cheng SD, Cheng ZX, Qin HG, Hu SX, Li XM (2012) Advances in research on botanical insecticides for termite control. Chin J Appl Entomol 49:778–784 (in Chinese)
Liu ZC, Lu YX, Liu JH, Ren PL (1988) Study on Serratia marcescens-pathogenic bacteria of rice planthopper. Nat Enem Insects 10:34–38 (in Chinese)
Nobutaka S, Masami N, Ken W, Katsymi A (2005) Synergistic antifungal activity of the culture filtrates of Serratia marcescens strain B2 and chemical fungicides against the sclerotia viability of the rice sheath blight pathogen, Rhizoctonia solani. Biocontrol Sci 10:97–100
Regev A, Keller M, Strizhov N, Sneh B, Prudovsky E, Chet I, Ginzberg I, Koncz-Kalman Z, Koncz C, Schell J, Zilberstein A (1996) Synergistic activity of a Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxin and a bacterial endochitinase against Spodoptera littoralis larvae. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3581–3586
Sampson MN, Gooday GW (1998) Involvement of chitinase of Bacillus thuringinesis during pathogenesis in insects. Microbiology 144:2189–2194
Tao K (2006) Studies on purification, gene cloning and expression of insecticidal protein. Doctorial dissertation, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Ting ASY, Meon S, Kadir J, Radu S, Singh G (2010) Induction of host defence enzymes by the endophytic bacterium Serratia marcescens, in banana plantlets. Int J Pest Manag 56:183–188
Wang K, Yan PS, Cao LX, Ding QL, Shao C, Zhao TF (2013) Potential of chitinolytic Serratia marcescens strain JPP1 for biological control of Aspergillus parasiticus and Aflatoxin. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/397142
Wang L, Zhang Z, Ou XK, Zhang JF, Jing YB, Zhang ZY, Cao JX, Li YP, Ma SY, Li RB (2010) Preliminary researches on the aphides bio-control with bacteria. Guangxi Agric Sci 41:226–230 (in Chinese)
Xu HG, Peng HY (2004) Delayed effects of chitinase of Serratia marcesens S3 on Helicoverpa armigera in different instars. Acta Microbiol Sin 44:88–92 (in Chinese)
Yang JY, Cao X, Ji CY, Zhao XF, Zhang MX (2015) Inhibitory effects of Serratia marcescens isolate PS-1 on the increase of experimental population of Spodoptera exigua. Chin J Biol Control 31:501–507 (in Chinese)
Yang Q, Zhou Y, Han GJ, Fang JC (2012) Isolation, identification and active ingredient analysis of two pathogenic bacterial strains isolated from Spodoptera exigua. Jiangsu J Agric Sci 28:1267–1271 (in Chinese)
Yin HX, Zhang J, Hou RT, Wang JD, Yang ZR (2004) Isolation and identification of a chitinase-producing bacterium and its synergistic effect on locust biocontrol. Plant Prot 30:37–41 (in Chinese)
Zhang DF, Yang PZ, Cao LL, Jiang ST (2015) Optimization of shake flask cultivation conditions for prodigiosin production by Serratia marcescen. Food Sci 36:119–124
Zhang YJ, Tan J, Lin YQ (2000) The effects on peritrophic membrane of Helicoverpa armigera treated by low temperature and chitinase. Chin J Biol Control 16:152–155 (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Project funding: The work was supported by the Zhenjiang's Key R & D Program-Modern Agriculture (NY201702), Jurong Agricultural Science and Technology support plan (NY2017846771), the Priority Academic Program Development Fund of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the Science and Technology Innovation of Nanjing Forestry University students.
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com
Corresponding editor: Tao Xu.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, R., Zhou, L., Feng, K. et al. Effects of Serratia marcescens (SM1) and its interaction with common biocontrol agents on the termite, Odontotermes formosanus (Shiraki). J. For. Res. 32, 1263–1267 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01122-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01122-w