Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of thermal and geometric properties of martensitic stainless steel thin walls built by additive manufacturing cold metal transfer (CMT) processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Additive manufacturing is often seen as a novel alternative compared to well-consolidated, subtractive, and formative manufacturing processes. Its presence in the industrial environment is rapidly increasing, and its performance and flexibility may be the answer for present-day fabrication challenges, combining solutions to minimize environmental impacts without losing competitiveness or product quality. Arc welding-based additive manufacturing (also known as wire arc additive manufacturing, WAAM) has been gaining prominence in the current Industry 4.0 scenario. For the advancement of this technology, multiple output analysis of the pertinent welding processes is essential, especially regarding studies applied to materials such as high-strength and high-cost steels. In this paper, a study was conducted with the AISI 420 alloy and CMT variants of the GMAW process applied to additive manufacturing of thin walls, comparing them with conventional GMAW process. The welding processes and deposited welds used were analyzed on electrical, thermal, morphological, and metallurgical aspects. In the end, CMT Advanced and CMT Pulse variants stood out as opposite extremes, whereby CMT Advanced presented the best performance in relation to wall height and heat input. CMT and conventional GMAW produced good and significantly similar results, highlighting the stability of CMT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The raw and processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Abbreviations

AM:

Additive manufacturing

AISI:

American Iron and Steel Institute

ASTM:

American Society for Testing and Materials

BTF:

Buy-to-fly

CG:

Coarse-grain

CMT:

Cold metal transfer

CTWD:

Contact tip to work distance

DF:

Dynamic feeding

GMAW:

Gas metal arc welding

GTAW:

Gas tungsten arc welding

HAZ:

Heat affected zone

HSLA:

High strength low alloy

HV:

Hardness Vickers

PAW:

Plasma arc welding

WAAM:

Wire and arc additive manufacturing

References

  1. Hoefer K, Haelsig A, Mayr P (2018) Arc-based additive manufacturing of steel components comparison of wire and powder based variants. Welding World – Int J Mater Join 2(62):243–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-017-0527-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Venturini G, Montevecchi F, Bandini F, Scippa A, Campatelli G (2018) Feature based three axes computer aided manufacturing software for wire arc additive manufacturing dedicated to thin walled components. Addit Manuf 22:643–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu B, Ding D, Zengxi P, Cuiuri D, Li H, Han J, Fei Z (2017) Effects of heat accumulation on the arc characteristics and metal transfer behavior in wire arc additive manufacturing of TI6Al4V. J Mater Process Technol 250:304–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.07.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali Y, Henckell P, Hildebrand J, Reimann J, Bergamann J, Barnikol-Oettler S (2019) Wire arc additive manufacturing of hot work tool steel with CMT process. J Mater Process Tech 269:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Willians S, Martina F, Addison A, Ding J, Pardal G, Colegrove P (2016) Wire + arc additive manufacturing. Mater Sci Technol 7(32):641–647. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding D, Pan Z, Cuiuri D, Li H (2015) Wire-feed additive manufacturing of metal components: Technologies, developments and future interests. Int J Adv Technol 81:465–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunningham C, Flynn J, Shokrani A, Dhokia V, Newman S (2018) Invited review article: Strategies and processes for high quality wire arc additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf 22:672–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Horgar A, Fostervoll H, Nyhus B, Ren X, Eriksson M, Akselsen O (2018) Additive manufacturing using WAAM with AA5183 wire. J Mater Process Technol 259:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnes J, Kingsbury A, Bono E (2016) Does low cost titanium powder yield low cost titanium parts? PowderMet 2016 International Conference on Powder Metallurgy. Boston, MA: [s.n.]

  10. Allen J (2006) An investigation into the comparative costs of additive manufacture vs. machine from solid for aero engine parts. RTO-MP-AVT-139

  11. Kou S (2002) Welding Metallurgy. 2nd. ed. [S.l.]: Wiley-Interscience

  12. Oliveira JP, Santos TG, Miranda RM (2020) Revisiting fundamental welding concepts to improve additive manufacturing: from theory to practice. Prog Mater Sci 107(07). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100590

  13. Pickin C, Young K (2006) Evaluation of cold metal transfer (CMT) process for welding aluminium alloy. Sci Technol Weld Join 11(5):583–585. https://doi.org/10.1179/174329306X120886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng J, Zhang H, He P (2009) The CMT short-circuiting metal transfer process and its use in thin aluminium sheets welding. Mater Des 5(30):1850–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang H, Feng J, Zhang B, Chen J, Wang L (2009) The arc characteristics and metal transfer behaviour of cold metal transfer and its use in joining aluminium to zinc-coated steel. Mater Sci Eng A Struct 499(1):111–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rozmus-Górnikowska M, Cieniek L, Blicharski M, Kusinski J (2014) Microstructure and microsegregation of an Inconel 625 weld overlay produced on steel pipes by the cold metal transfer technique. Arch Metall Mater 59(3):1081–1084. https://doi.org/10.2478/amm-2014-0185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dutra J, Silva R, Marques C, Viviani A (2016). A new approach for MIG/MAG cladding with Inconel 625. Welding World 60(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-016-0371-3

  18. Benoit A, Jobez S, Paillard P, Klosek V, Baudin T (2011) Study of Inconel 718 weldability using MIG CMT process. Sci Technol Weld Join 16(6):477–482. https://doi.org/10.1179/1362171811Y.0000000031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cao R, Sun J, Chen J, Wang P (2014) Weldability of CMT joining of AA6061-T6 to boron steels with various coatings. Weld J 93(6):193S-204S

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shang J, Wang K, Zhou Q, Zhang D, Huang J, Li G (2012) Microstructure characteristics and mechanical properties of cold metal transfer welding Mg/Al dissimilar metals. Mater Des 34:559–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kah P, Suoranta R, Martikainen J (2013) Advanced gas metal arc welding processes. Int J Adv Manuf Process 67(1–4):655–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4513-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cong B, Ding J, Williams S (2015) Effect of arc mode in cold metal transfer process on porosity of additively manufactured Al-6.3% Cu alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(9–12):1593–1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6346-x

  23. Derekar K, Addison A, Joshi S, Zhang X, Lawrence J, Xu L, Melton G, Griffiths D (2020) Effect of pulsed metal inert gas (pulsed-MIG) and cold metal transfer (CMT) techniques on hydrogen dissolution in wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) of aluminium. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:311–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04946-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ortega A, Galvan L, Deschaux-Beaume F, Mezrag B, Rouquette S (2018) Effect of process parameters on the quality of aluminium alloy Al5Si deposits in wire and arc additive manufacturing using a cold metal transfer process. Sci Technol Weld Joining 23(4):316–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2017.1388995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Almeida P, Williams S (2010) Innovative process model of ti-6al-4v additive layer manufacturing using cold metal transfer (cmt). Proceedings of the 21st Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. [S.l.]: [s.n.]

  26. Yildiz A, Davut K, Koc B, Yilmaz O (2020) Wire arc additive manufacturing of high-strength low alloy steels: study of process parameters and their influence on the bead geometry and mechanical characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108:3391–3404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05482-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Posch G, Chladil K, Chladil H (2017) Material properties of CMT - metal additive manufatured duplex stainless steel blade-like geometries. Welding World – Int J Mater Join 61(5):873–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-017-0474-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ASTM International (2017) E92 - standard test methods for Vickers hardness and Knoop hardness of metallic materials. West Conshohocken

  29. Lancaster J (1984) The Physics of Welding. Physics in Technology, Northern Ireland

  30. Arevalo H, Vilarinho L (2012) Development and assessment of calorimeters using liquid nitrogen and continuous flow (water) for heat input measurement. Welding Int São Paulo 17(3):236–250. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-92242012000300008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiao Y, Ouden G (1990) A study of GTA weld pool oscilation. Welding J 289s–293s

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research proposed in this paper was supported by LABSOLDA — Welding and Mechatronics Institute and Federal University of Santa Catarina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DG conducted the experimental procedures and was responsible for writing the paper; RHGeS contributed to the paper structure, methodology, and did the final proofreading and writing refinement; PCJR assisted the experimental procedures and proofreading; MBS provided literature and was co-responsible for writing the paper; and ABV provided literature, methods, and experimental support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Galeazzi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

All authors have approved to participate.

Consent for publication

The manuscript was approved by all authors for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galeazzi, D., Silva, R.H.G.e., Viviani, A.B. et al. Evaluation of thermal and geometric properties of martensitic stainless steel thin walls built by additive manufacturing cold metal transfer (CMT) processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 2151–2165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08921-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08921-x

Keywords

Navigation