Skip to main content
Log in

The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap) As a Response-Time and Event-Related-Potentials Methodology for Testing Natural Verbal Relations: A Preliminary Study

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current article reports the first attempt to test the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), as a group-based measure of natural verbal relations, using both response-latency and event-related potentials as dependent variables. On each trial of the IRAP, participants were presented with 1 of 2 attribute stimuli (“Pleasant” or “Unpleasant”), a positive (e.g., “Love”) or negative (e.g., “Murder”) target stimulus, and 2 relational terms, “Similar” and “Opposite,” as response options. Participants were required to respond as quickly and accurately as possible across blocks of trials, with half of the blocks requiring responses that were deemed consistent (e.g., Pleasant–Love–Similar), and the other half inconsistent (e.g., Pleasant–Love–Opposite), with natural verbal relations. Shorter mean latencies were predicted for consistent than for inconsistent blocks. Two separate experiments supported this prediction. Event-related potentials, gathered during the second experiment, also proved to be sensitive to the IRAP, yielding more negative waveforms for inconsistent relative to consistent blocks of trials. A theoretical interpretation of the IRAP effect is offered, and important directions for future research are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., LAWLOR, H., SMEETS, P.M., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and academic self-concept among mildly mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped children. The Psychological Record, 46, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2003). For the radical behaviorist biological events are not biological and public events are not public. Behavior and Philosophy, 31, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., POWER, P., HAYDEN, E., MILNE, R., & STEWART, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32, 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., REGAN, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., COMMINS, S., WALSH, D., STEWART, I., et al. (2005). Relating derived relations as a model of analogical reasoning: Reaction times and event related potentials. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 84, 435–452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., STTON, C., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., WHELAN, R., STEWART, I., COMMINS, S., et al. (2004). Interfacing relational frame theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, the implicit association test, and event related potentials. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy,, 215–240.

  • BARNES-HOLMES, D., STAUNTON, C., WHELAN R., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., COMMINS, S., WALSH, D., Et al. (2005). Derived stimulus relations, semantic priming, and event-related potentials: Testing a behavioral theory of semantic networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 84, 417–434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CAIRNS, E. (1984). Social identity in Northern Ireland. Human Relations, 37, 1095–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DE HOUWER, J. (2002). The Implicit Association Test as a tool for studying dysfunctional associations in psychopathology: Strengths and limitations. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 33, 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DE HOUWER, J. (2006). What are implicit attitudes and why are we using them? In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 11–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DE JONG, P. (2002). Implicit self-esteem and social anxiety: Differential self-positivity effects in high and low anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 501–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DE JONG, P., PASMAN, W., KINDT, M.,., & VAN DEN HOUT, M. A. (2001). A reaction time paradigm to assess (implicit) complaint-specific dysfunctional beliefs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 101–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., REHFELDT, R. A., ZLOMKE, K. M., & ROBINSON, A. (2006). Exploring the development and dismantling of equivalence classes involving terrorist stimuli. The Psychological Record, 56, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOVIDIO, J. F., & FAZIO, R. H. (1992). New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In J. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Meaning, memory, expression and social interaction in surveys (pp. 204–237) New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • GEMAR, M. C., SEGAL Z. V., SAGRATI, S., & KENNEDY, S. J. (2001). Mood-induced changes on the Implicit Association Test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 282–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, A. G., & BANAJI, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, A. G., BANAJI, M. R., RUDMAN, L. A., FARNHAM, S. D., NOSEK, B. A., & MELLOTT, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, A. G., MCGHEE, D. E., & SCHWARTZ, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • GREENWALD, A. G., NOSEK, B. A., & BANAJI, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2003). Behavior analysis, relational frame theory, and the challenge of human language and cognition: A reply to the commentaries on relational frame theory—A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 39–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HOLCOMB, P. J., & ANDERSON, J. E. (1993). Cross-modal semantic priming: A time-course analysis using event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 327–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KOUNIOS, S. A., & HOLCOMB P. J. (1992). Structure and process in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related potentials and reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 460–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • KUTAS, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for simple-word and sentence-context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 533–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KUTAS, M., & HILLIARD, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 1161-1163.

  • LESLIE, J. C., TIERNEY, K. J., ROBINSON, C. P., KEENAN, M., WATT, A., & BARNES, D. (1993). Differences between clinically anxious and non-anxious subjects in a stimulus equivalence training task involving threat words. The Psychological Record, 43, 153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCKENNA, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., BARNES-HOLMES, Y., & STEWART, I. (2007). Testing the fake-ability of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap): The first study. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy,, 123–138.

  • MERWIN, R. M., & WILSON, K. G. (2005). Preliminary findings on the effects of self-referring and evaluative stimuli on stimulus equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 55, 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’HORA, D., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P.M. (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’HORA, D., PELAEZ, M., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & AMESTY, L. (2005). Derived relational responding and human language: Evidence from the Wais III. The Psychological Record, 55, 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’TOOLE, C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMYTH, S. (2007). A derived transfer of functions and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 263–283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, S. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2002). Developing an ecologically valid model of analogy using the relational evaluation procedure. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 20, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2004). A functional analytic model of analogy using the relational evaluation procedure. The Psychological Record, 54, 531–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEACHMAN, B. A., GREGG, A. P., & WOODY, S. R. (2001). Implicit associations of fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 226–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WALTZ, J. A., KNOWLTON, B. J., HOLYOAY, K. J., BOONE, K. B., MISHKIN, F. S., SANTOS, M. D., Et Al. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WATT, A. W., KEENAN, M., BARNES, D., & CAIRNS, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEISBROD, M., KEIFER M., WINKLER, S., MAIER, S., HILL, R., ROESCH-ELY, D., Et Al. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of direct versus indirect semantic priming in normal volunteers. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 289–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dermot Barnes-Holmes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayden, E., Barnes-Holmes, Y. et al. The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Irap) As a Response-Time and Event-Related-Potentials Methodology for Testing Natural Verbal Relations: A Preliminary Study. Psychol Rec 58, 497–516 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395634

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395634

Navigation