Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A functional-analytic model of analogy using the Relational Evaluation Procedure

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analogical reasoning is conceptualized by Relational Frame Theory as responding in accordance with an equivalence relation between equivalence or other types of derived stimulus relations. The purpose of this study was to provide an empirical demonstration of analogy using the Relational Evaluation Procedure (REP), a recently developed technique for the rapid training and testing of derived stimulus relations. The experiment involved 9 stages in which 5 adult male subjects were exposed to a complex series of REP training and testing protocols, by the end of which they each readily demonstrated 24 completely novel instances of responding in accordance with analogical relations as conceptualized by RFT. The implications of these results for future functional analytic investigations of analogical reasoning are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ALEXANDER, P. A., WHITE, C. S., HAENSLY, P. A., & CRIMMINS-JEANES, M. (1987). Training in analogical reasoning. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 387–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALEXANDER, P. A., WILLSON, V. L., WHITE, C. S., & FUQUA, J. D. (1987). Analogical reasoning in young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., HEGARTY, N., & SMEETS, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CULLINAN, V. A., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1998). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CULLINAN, V. A., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (2000). A precursor to the relational evaluation procedure: Analyzing stimulus equivalence II. The Psychological Record, 50, 467–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., & BARNES, B. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251–267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions In accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more-than, and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • ELIASMITH, C., & THAGARD, P. (2001). Integrating structure and meaning: A distributed model of analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 25(2), 245–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EYSENCK, M. W., & KEANE, M. T. (2000). Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook (4th ed.) New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERREIRA, F., CHRISTIANSON, K., & HOLLINGWORTH, A. (2001). Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 3–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • FORBUS, K. D., FERGUSON, R. W., & GENTNER, D. (1994). Incremental structure mapping. In A. Ram & K. Eiselt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 313–318). Atlanta, GA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • GIBSON, E., & THOMAS, J. (1999). Memory limitations and structural forgetting: The perception of complex ungrammatical sentences as grammatical. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(3), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on Verbal Behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9–30). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & BARNES, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235–270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & ROCHE, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post Skinnerian approach to language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOLYOAK, K. J., & THAGARD, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13(3), 295–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HUMMEL, J. E., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104(3), 427–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KEANE, M. T., LEDGEWAY, T., & DUFF, S. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 387–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEADER, G., & BARNES, D. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEADER, G., BARNES-HOLMES, D., & SMEETS, P. (2000). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure III. The Psychological Record, 50, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MASTERSON, J. J., EVANS, L. H., & ALOIA, M. (1993). Verbal analogical reasoning in children with language-learning disabilities. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 36(1), 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROCHE, B., STEWART, I., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (1999). PsyScope: An easy-to use graphical system for designing and controlling equivalence experiments. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 17, 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1989). Recent issues in the analysis of behavior. Columbus: Merrill Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., HAYES, S. C., & LIPKENS, R. (2001). Relations among relations: Analogies, metaphors and stories. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 73–86). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 51, 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEWART, I., BARNES-HOLMES, D., ROCHE, B., & SMEETS, P. M. (2002). A functional analytic model of analogy. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 375–396.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • VOSNIADOU, S., & ORTONY, O. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

    Ian Stewart

  2. National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland

    Dermot Barnes-Holmes & Bryan Roche

Authors
  1. Ian Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dermot Barnes-Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bryan Roche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Stewart.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Roche, B. A functional-analytic model of analogy using the Relational Evaluation Procedure. Psychol Rec 54, 531–552 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395491

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395491

Search

Navigation