Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptual Differences in the Analysis of Stimulus Equivalence

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of structure from undifferentiated beginnings has long been a fundamental problem in science, in biology, the issue was one of form versus function, and in psychology psychologists struggled with how infants make sense of, and consolidate, the flood of sensory input they are faced with. Although the concept of discriminative responding has proven useful in this regard, describing the emergence of structure which sometimes follows conditional discrimination procedures as stimulus equivalence has had important implications for subsequent research in the field.

Arising from the plethora of research on stimulus equivalence, the theoretical treatises of Sidman (1994), S. C. Hayes (1994), and Horne and Lowe (1996) have distinguished themsetves quickly in a crowded field. As all three of the substantive positions appear to be developing parallel to each other, some history of the field as well as inherent shortcomings of each of the theoretical positions are discussed. Secondary theories and important new methodologies suggest where the field is or should be heading if we are to keep sight of our original goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264–266.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., HAMPSON, P. J. (1997). Connectionist models of arbitrarily applicable relations responding: A possible role tor the hippocampal system. In J. Donahoe (Ed.), Neural network models of cognition: Biobehavioral Foundations. Advances in psychology, Vol. 121 (pp. 496–521). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BISHOP, D. V. M., ROBSON, J. (1989). Unimpaired short-term memory and rhyme judgment in congenitally speechless individuals: Implications for the notion of “Articuiatory coding.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41 A, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., DE ROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C. (1996). On the origins of behavior structure. In T. R. Zentail & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 3–12). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • COWLEY, B. J., GREEN, G., BRAUNLING-MCMORROW, D. (1992). Using stimulus equivalence procedures to teach name-face matching to adults with brain injuries. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 461–475.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DE ROSE, J. C., DE SOUZA, D. G., ROSSITO, A. L., DE ROSE, T. M. S. (1992). Stimulus equivalence and generalization in reading after matching to sample by exclusion. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 68–82). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DOUGHER, M. J., MARKHAM, M. R. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence and the transfer of function. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato., & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUGDALE, N. (1996). Naming, stimulus equivalence, and conditioned hearing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 272–274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DUGDALE, N., LOWE, C. F. (1990), Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. LeJeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • DYMOND, S., BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more-than, and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • EIKESETH, S., SMITH, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high-functioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123–133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • EPSTEIN, R. (1985). The spontaneous interconnection of three repertories. The Psychological Record, 35, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOULD, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phytogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREEN, G., STROMER, R., MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREY, I. M., BARNES, D. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and attitudes. The Psychological Record, 46, 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1992). Equivalence as process. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J. (1996). Listening with understanding and speaking with meaning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 282–283

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385–392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relation control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato., & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., BARNES, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68(2), 235–244.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HORNE, R J., LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • JAMES, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology: A sample of scientific system construction. Granville, Oh: The Principia Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1977). Psychological linguistics. Chicago, II: The Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIPKENS, R. (1992). A behavioral analysis of complex human functioning: Analogical reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOWE, C. F., BEASTY, A. (1987). Language and the emergence of equivalence relations: A developmental study. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, A42.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOWE, C. F., HORNE, P. J. (1996). Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 315–340.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MACE, C. F. (1996). In pursuit of general behavioral relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 557–563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MARKHAM, M. R., DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MATOS, M. A., & HUBNER-D’OLIVEIRA, M. M. (1992). Equivalence relations and reading. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 83–96). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V. (1990). Do stimulus classes exist before they are tested? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 13–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • NEVIN, J. A. (1995). Behavioral economics and behavioral momentum. Special Issue: Behavioral economics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64(3), 385–395.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PARROTT, L J. (1984). Listening and understanding. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 29–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ROCHE, B., BARNES, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test oi the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAUNDERS, R. R., GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., KASTAK, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1971), Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent stimulus classes. In T. Thompson & M. D., Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. LeJeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations. Reno, NV: Context Press

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. R (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 140, 951–958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • STEELE, D. L., HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STEMMER, N. (1995). Do we need an alternative theory of verbal behavior?: A reply to Hayes and Wilson. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 357–362.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in science: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • YAMAMOTO, J., & ASANO, T. (1995). Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). The Psychological Record, 45, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Arts & Sciences, University of Guam, UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam, 96923

    Michael C. Clayton

  2. University of Nevada, UK

    Linda J. Hayes

Authors
  1. Michael C. Clayton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda J. Hayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Clayton.

Additional information

This paper was written in partial fulfillment of Michael Clayton’s doctoral degree requirement under supervision of Linda J. Hayes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clayton, M.C., Hayes, L.J. Conceptual Differences in the Analysis of Stimulus Equivalence. Psychol Rec 49, 145–161 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395312

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395312

Search

Navigation