Skip to main content
Log in

A Traditional Account of Stimulus Equivalence

  • Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-term contingency account of stimulus equivalence is presented. The performances of stimulus equivalence are interpreted as instances of generalized performances. It is assumed that the generalized performances are caused by reinforcement histories in the usual environments of humans. The present account differs from the account proposed by Hayes and Hayes (1989) with regard to the nature of the responding brought about by the reinforcement histories and with regard to the role of context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BAER, D. M. (1973). The control of developmental process: Why wait? In J. R. Nesselroade & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological issues (pp. 185–193). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BIRKHOFF, G., & MACLANE, S. (1965). A survey of modern algebra. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRANCH, M. N. (1977). On the role of “memory” in the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 28. 171–179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C. (1968). Glossary. In A. C. Catania (Ed.), Contemporary research in operant behavior (pp. 327–349). Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • CATANIA, A. C. (1973). The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior. Behaviorism, 1, 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’AMATO, M. R., SALMON, D. P., LOUKAS, E., & TOMIE, A. (1985). Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 4. 5–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • dE ROSE, J. C., MCLLVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., GALPIN, V. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1988). Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 115–138). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., DEVANY, J. M., KOHLENBERG, B. S., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., & SHELBY, J. (1987). Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior. Revista Mexicana de Analysis de la Conducta, 13, 361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119–137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, L. J., TILLEY, K. J., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Extending equivalence class membership to gustatory stimuli. The Psychological Record, 38, 473–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • HINELINE, P. N., & WANCHISEN, B. A. (1989). Correlated hypothesizing and the distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 221–268). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HOGAN, D. E., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1977). Backward associations in the pigeon. American Journal of Psychology, 90, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KENDALL, S. B. (1983). Tests for mediated transfer in pigeons. The Psychological Record, 33, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LIPKENS, R., KOP, P. F. M., & MATTHIJS, W., (1988). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395–409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RISLEY, T. R., & HART, B. (1968). Developing correspondence between the nonverbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 267–281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • RODEWALD, H. K. (1974). Symbolic matching-to-sample by pigeons. Psychological Reports, 34, 987–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHERMAN, J. A., SAUNDERS, R. R., & BRIGHAM, T. A. (1970). Transfer of matching and mismatching behavior in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 9, 489–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., RAUZIN, R., LAZAR, R., CUNNINGHAM, S., TAILBY, W., & CARRIGAN, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • SIDMAN, M., WILLSON-MORRIS, M., & KIRK, B. (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SPRADLIN, J. E., COTTER, V. W., & BAXLEY, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556–566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WETHERBY, B., KARLAN, G. R., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1983). The development of derived stimulus relations through training in arbitrary-matching sequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40, 69–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WOODWORTH, R. S., & SCHLOSBERG, H. (1954). Experimental psychology (3rd ed.). London: Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZEILER, M. (1977). Schedules of reinforcement: The controlling variables. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 201–232). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boelens, H. A Traditional Account of Stimulus Equivalence. Psychol Rec 44, 587–605 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395145

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395145

Navigation