Abstract
A three-term contingency account of stimulus equivalence is presented. The performances of stimulus equivalence are interpreted as instances of generalized performances. It is assumed that the generalized performances are caused by reinforcement histories in the usual environments of humans. The present account differs from the account proposed by Hayes and Hayes (1989) with regard to the nature of the responding brought about by the reinforcement histories and with regard to the role of context.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BAER, D. M. (1973). The control of developmental process: Why wait? In J. R. Nesselroade & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological issues (pp. 185–193). New York: Academic Press.
BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.
BIRKHOFF, G., & MACLANE, S. (1965). A survey of modern algebra. New York: MacMillan.
BRANCH, M. N. (1977). On the role of “memory” in the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 28. 171–179.
CATANIA, A. C. (1968). Glossary. In A. C. Catania (Ed.), Contemporary research in operant behavior (pp. 327–349). Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman.
CATANIA, A. C. (1973). The concept of the operant in the analysis of behavior. Behaviorism, 1, 103–116.
D’AMATO, M. R., SALMON, D. P., LOUKAS, E., & TOMIE, A. (1985). Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 4. 5–47.
dE ROSE, J. C., MCLLVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., GALPIN, V. C., & STODDARD, L. T. (1988). Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 1–20.
DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.
DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 115–138). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C., DEVANY, J. M., KOHLENBERG, B. S., BROWNSTEIN, A. J., & SHELBY, J. (1987). Stimulus equivalence and the symbolic control of behavior. Revista Mexicana de Analysis de la Conducta, 13, 361–374.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum Press.
HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383–1395.
HAYES, S. C., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119–137.
HAYES, L. J., TILLEY, K. J., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Extending equivalence class membership to gustatory stimuli. The Psychological Record, 38, 473–482.
HINELINE, P. N., & WANCHISEN, B. A. (1989). Correlated hypothesizing and the distinction between contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 221–268). New York: Plenum Press.
HOGAN, D. E., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1977). Backward associations in the pigeon. American Journal of Psychology, 90, 3–15.
KENDALL, S. B. (1983). Tests for mediated transfer in pigeons. The Psychological Record, 33, 245–256.
LIPKENS, R., KOP, P. F. M., & MATTHIJS, W., (1988). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395–409.
MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
RISLEY, T. R., & HART, B. (1968). Developing correspondence between the nonverbal and verbal behavior of preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 267–281.
RODEWALD, H. K. (1974). Symbolic matching-to-sample by pigeons. Psychological Reports, 34, 987–990.
SHERMAN, J. A., SAUNDERS, R. R., & BRIGHAM, T. A. (1970). Transfer of matching and mismatching behavior in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 9, 489–498.
SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93–114). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
SIDMAN, M., RAUZIN, R., LAZAR, R., CUNNINGHAM, S., TAILBY, W., & CARRIGAN, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44.
SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SIDMAN, M., WILLSON-MORRIS, M., & KIRK, B. (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1–19.
SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.
SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
SPRADLIN, J. E., COTTER, V. W., & BAXLEY, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556–566.
WETHERBY, B., KARLAN, G. R., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1983). The development of derived stimulus relations through training in arbitrary-matching sequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40, 69–78.
WOODWORTH, R. S., & SCHLOSBERG, H. (1954). Experimental psychology (3rd ed.). London: Methuen & Co.
ZEILER, M. (1977). Schedules of reinforcement: The controlling variables. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 201–232). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boelens, H. A Traditional Account of Stimulus Equivalence. Psychol Rec 44, 587–605 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395145
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395145