Abstract
This paper takes up the question of the way in which ‘the problem with educational Research’ is represented. It takes as its point of departure two recent views on ‘the Problem’ — one expressed by an educational journalist and one presented by the Australian Council of Deans of Education. It locates these within a larger frame of international debate about educational research and its problems and considers how these arise out of particular dispositions towards educational research and, by extension towards, education itself.
The paper suggests that the different positions on the problem with educational research, and hence on the solution to the problem, fail to engage in the question of education itself as a problem of the present. It argues that this problem is produced through twin fantasies about education: a redemptive fantasy about the possibility and the imperative for education to solve problems of social disadvantage; and a disciplinary fantasy that faculties of education can do this by themselves. Through an examination of the ‘de-sciencing’ of education in the past decade or so, and its recent ‘re-sciencing’, the authors conclude that, with all the problems that might be identified that pertain to educational research and to faculties of education, the most significant might well be a failure of research imagination. Overcoming this problem demands engagement with provocative ideas coming from outside traditional educational expertise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm (2002) The Pedagogisation of the Employee http://ir.lib.cbs.dk/download/ISBN/x656312113.pdf
Australian Council of Deans of Education (ACDE) (2005)Research Quality Framework, Response to the Issues paper, DEST, Canberra.
Bauman, Z. (2004) Zygmunt Bauman: Liquid Sociality, in N. Gane, ed.,The Future of Social Theory, Continuum, London, pp.17–46.
Britzman, D. (1997) The tangles of implication,Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp.31–37.
Buckingham, J. (2005) The problem with educational research,The Australian, Feb 18, p.18.
Burkhardt, H. and A. H. Schoenfeld (2003) Improving Educational Research: toward a more useful, more influential and better-funded enterprise,Educational Researcher, vol. 32, no. 9, pp.3–14.
Castells, M. (2001)The Internet Galaxy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dahlberg, L. (2004) Internet Research Tracings: Towards Non-Reductionist Methodology,Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, vol. 9, no. (3), http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol9/issue3/dahlberg.html
DETYA (2001) Educational Research: In Whose Interests? Higher Education Series report No 39, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra, May.
Doherty, L. (2005) What on Earth are They Teaching our Children?The Sydney Morning Herald, August 13–14, p.1.
Drapeau, M. (2002) Subjectivity in Research: Why Not? But…,The Qualitative Report, vol. 7, no. 3, September, (http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-3/drapeau.html)
Eisner, E. (1988) The primacy of experience and the politics of method,Educational Researcher, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 15–20.
Expert Advisory Group, RQF (2005)Research Quality Framework: Assessing the quality and impact of research in Australia. The Preferred Model. Commonwealth of Australia, September.
Fisher, D., G. Edwards, M. Dow and R. Shea (1999) The Legitimation of Education in Canadian Universities: A social history of the Canadian Society for Research in Education, in M. Allard, et al., eds.,A Challenge Met: the definition and recognition of the field of Education, Ottawa, Canadian Society for the Study of Education, pp.7–118
Florida, R. (2002)The Rise of the Creative Class, Basic Books, New York.
Green, W., J. Hodgens and A. Luke (1997) Debating Literacy in Australia: history lesson and popular f(r)ictions,The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, vol 20, pp. 6–24.
Green, B. and A. Lee (1999) Educational Research, Disciplinarity, and Postgraduate Pedagogy: On the Subject of Supervision, in A. Holbrook and S. Johnston, eds.,Postgraduate Education in Education, published by the Australian Association of Research in Education, pp.88–104.
Greenfield, S. (2003)Tomorrow’s People: How 21 st Century technology is changing the way we think and feel, Penguin, London.
Hoestetler, K. (2005) What is ‘Good’ Educational Research?Educational Researcher, vol. 34, no. 6, Aug–Sept, pp.16–21.
Kaestle, C. (1993) The Awful Reputation of Educational Research,Educational Researcher, vol. 22, no. 1, pp, 23–31.
Kemp, D. (1999)Knowledge and Innovation, AGPS, Canberra.
Lather, P. (1996) in E. McWilliam, P. Lather and W. Morgan (1996)Field Work, Head Work, Text Work: A textshop in new feminist research. (Video and workbook), Centre for Policy and Leadership Studies, QUT, Brisbane.
Lather, P (1998)Against Empathy, Voice and Authenticity, paper presented at the Annual American Educational Research Association Conference, San Diego, April.
Leadbeater, C. (1999)Living on Thin Air: The New Economy, Viking, New York.
Lee, A. (2005) Knowing our Business: the role of education in the university, 6th discussion paper of the Australian Council of Deans of Education, http://www.acde.edu.au/discussion.htm
Lessig, L. (2005)The Vision for Creative Commons: What are We and Where are We Headed? Keynote Address presented at the ‘Open Content Licensing (OCL): Cultivating the Creative Commons’ Conference, QUT Brisbane, 18–19 January.
Maiden, S. (2005) Step up Teacher Training: Nelson,The Australian, 28 February, p.4.
Maguire, S. and J. Rennison (2005) Two Years On: The destinations of young people who are not in education, employment or training at 16,Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp.187–201.
McWilliam, E., A. Lawson, T. Evans and P. G. Taylor (2005) Silly, soft and otherwise suspect: Doctoral education as risky business,Australian Journal of Education, vol. 49, no. 2, pp.214–227.
Middleton, S. (2001)Educating Researchers: New Zealand Education PhDs 1948-1998. NZARE (New Zealand Association for Research in Education) Monograph No. 7.
Nelson, B. (2005) Vision of a Nation Working as One,The Australian, Feb 28, p.12.
Popkewitz, T. (1997) Educational sciences and the normalisations of the teacher and the child: Some historical notes on current USA pedagogical reforms, in I. Nilsson and L. Lundahl, eds.,Teachers, curriculum and policy, Umea University, pp. 91–114.
Reissman, C. (1992) Women and medicalization: A new perspective, in G. Kirkup and L. Smith Keller, eds.,Inventing Women: Science, Technology and Gender, Polity/Open University Press, Cambridge, pp.123–144.
Renshaw, P. (2003) Community and learning: contradictions and dilemmas,Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, vol. 24, no. 3, pp.355–370.
Silverman, D. (2000) The Contested Character of Qualitative Research, inDoing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook, Sage, London, pp.283–297.
Taylor, P. G. (2005)Managing Our Attentional Economy in a Changing Landscape: Complexity, Learning and Leadership. Keynote presentation at QTU’sLeadership — The Changing Landscape Conference for Educational Administrators, Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre, 19 August.
Vitebsky, P. (1993) Is death the same everywhere: contexts of knowing and doubting, in M. Hobart, ed.,An Anthropological Critique of Development: The growth of ignorance, Routledge, London, pp.100–115.
Yates, L. (2004)What Does Good Education Research Look Like? Open University Press, Berkshire.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McWilliam, E., Lee, A. The problem of ‘the problem with educational research’. Aust. Educ. Res. 33, 43–60 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216833
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216833