Abstract
In educational studies, the paradigm war over quantitative and qualitative research approaches has raged for more than half a century. The focus in the late twentieth century was on the distinction between the two approaches, and the motivation was to retain one of the approaches’ supremacy. Since the early twenty-first century, there has been a growing interest in situating in the middle position and combining both approaches into a single study or a series of studies. Despite these signs of progress, when it comes to using the appropriate research approach at the right time, beginner educational researchers remain perplexed. This paper, therefore, provides useful guidelines that facilitate the choice of quantitative, qualitative, or mixed research approaches in educational inquiry. To achieve this objective, this article comprises three distinct and underlying areas of interest, which have been structured into three sections. The first section highlights the distinctions between quantitative and qualitative research approaches. The second section discusses the paradigm views that underpin the choice of a particular research approach. Finally, an effort has been made to determine the appropriate time to opt for any of the research approaches that facilitate successful educational investigations. Since truth and the means used to discover it are both dynamic, it is also essential to foresight innovative approaches to research with distinguishing features of applications to educational research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åkerblad, L., Seppänen-Järvelä, R., & Haapakoski, K. (2021). Integrative strategies in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 15(2), 152–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820957125
Allwood, C. M. (2012). The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic. Quality and Quantity, 46(5), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9455-8
Amaratugna, D., Baldry, D., Sarshar, M., & Newton, R. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: Application of “mixed” research approach. Work Study, 51(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/00438020210415488
Antwi, S. K., & Hamza, K. (2015). Quantitative and qualitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflections. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(3), 217–225.
Bailey, L. F. (2014). The origin and success of qualitative research. International Journal of Market Research, 56(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2014-013
Belk, R. W. (2013). Qualitative versus quantitative research in marketing. Revista de Negócios, 18(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.7867/1980-4431.2013v18n1p5-9
Brinkmann, S., Jacobsen, M. H., Kristiansen, S., Brinkmann, S., Jacobsen, M. H., & Kristiansen, S. (2014). Historical overview of qualitative research in the social sciences. In The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 16–42). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.017
Burke Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 99–104.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=dberspeakers
Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119, 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775
Daniel, E. (2016). The usefulness of qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in researching problem-solving ability in science education curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 91–100.
Dawadi, S. (2017). Are quantitative and qualitative approaches to educational research compatible? The Warwick ELT, 3(6). https://thewarwickeltezine.wordpress.com/2017/05/31/291/
Ejnavarzala, H. (2019). Epistemology–ontology relations in social research: A review. Sociological Bulletin, 68(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022918819369
Fagan, M. B. (2010). Social construction revisited: Epistemology and scientific practice. Philosophy of Science, 77(1), 92–116.
Farrell, E. (2020). Researching lived experience in education: Misunderstood or missed opportunity? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920942066
Fassinger, R., & Morrow, S. L. (2013). Toward best practices in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research: A social justice perspective. Journal of Social Action in Counseling Psychology, 5(2), 69–83.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
Gunasekare, U. (2015). Mixed research method as the third research paradigm: A literature review. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(8), 363–367.
Hodkinson, P. (2004). Research as a form of work: Expertise, community and methodological objectivity. British Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920310001629947
Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2011). Introduction to research methods in psychology (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
Khaldi, K. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative or mixed research: Which research paradigm to use? Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n2p15
Krivokapic-skoko, B., & O’neill, G. (2011). Beyond the qualitative-quantitative distinction: Some innovative methods for business and management research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(5), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2011.5.3.290
Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.3.221.16560
Levers, M. J. D. (2013). Philosophical paradigms, grounded theory, and perspectives on emergence. SAGE Open, 3(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013517243
Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
Mack, L. (2010). The philosophical underpinnings of educational research. Polyglossia, 19, 5–11.
Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013220
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–525.
Maxwell, J. A., & Reybold, L. E. (2015). Qualitative research. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 19, pp. 685–689). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10558-6
Mertens, D. M. (2012). What comes first? The paradigm or the approach? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 255–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812461574
Meyer, D. K., & Schutz, P. A. (2020). Why talk about qualitative and mixed methods in educational psychology? Introduction to special issue. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1796671
Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462
Morgan, D. L., & Nica, A. (2020). Iterative thematic inquiry: A new method for analyzing qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118
Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y., & Rowa-Dewar, N. (2011). Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: A methodological review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005
Poli, R. (2018). A note on the classification of future-related methods. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-018-0145-9
Rahman, M. S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “Testing and Assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed methods research. Quality & Quantity, 36, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014301607592
Salvador, J. T. (2016). Exploring quantitative and qualitative methodologies: A guide to novice nursing researchers. European Scientific Journal, 12(18), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n18p107
Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815575861
Symonds, J. E., & Gorard, S. (2010). Death of mixed methods? Or the rebirth of research as a craft. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790.2010.483514
Taylor, P., & Kanis, H. (2004). The quantitative-qualitative research dichotomy revisited. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(6), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922041233130303418
Techo, V. P. (2016). Research methods-quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Horizons University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1262.4886
Wohlfart, O. (2020). “Digging Deeper?”: Insights from a novice researcher. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920963778
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.
Funding
No funding was received for this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulisa, F. When Does a Researcher Choose a Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Research Approach?. Interchange 53, 113–131 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09447-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09447-z