Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A framework for gender justice: Evaluating the transformative capacities of three key Australian schooling initiatives

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through a feminist agenda that seeks to redress gender inequities through remedies of redistribution and recognition, this paper draws on Fraser’s work (1997) to articulate a framework of transformative justice. In moving beyond the competing logics underpinning such remedies, this framework adopts a transformative theory and politics in problematising and seeking to restructure the inequitable gender differentiation of political-economic structures and social patterns of representation, interpretation and communication. This framework of gender justice is presented as useful in evaluating the ideologies and practices of particular schooling initiatives and thus is drawn on to critically assess three initiatives that currently seek to address issues of social/gender equity in education within Australia: The New Basics Project, The Productive Pedagogies Framework and the Success for Boys initiative. In particular, the paper critically explores these initiatives in terms of their capacities for enabling or constraining a transformative redistributive and cultural gender justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ailwood, J. (2003) A national approach to gender equity policy in Australia: another ending, another opening?,International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 7 no. 1. pp. 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allard, A. & J. McLeod (2003) To stay or to go? ‘At risk’ young women speak about their influences and experiences in making decisions about post-compulsory schooling. Selected Conference Proceedings of theAustralian Curriculum Studies Association Biennial Conference, Adelaide, September, 2003.

  • Alloway, N. (1995)Foundation Stones: The Construction of Gender in Early Childhood, Curriculum Corporation, Carlton, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabazon, T. (2002)Ladies Who Lunge, UNSW Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C., J. Kenway & J. McLeod (2000)Factors Influencing the Educational Performance of Males and Females in School and Their Initial Destinations After Leaving School: A Project Funded by the Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.

  • Connell, R. W. (2000)The Men and the Boys, Allen & Unwin, St. Leonards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, E. (2002) “Boys and Girls and the Costs of Gendered Behaviour”, Department of Education, Tasmania, Retrieved: 12 April 2002 from http://www.education.tas.gov.au/equitystandards/gender/framewrk/cox.htm.

  • Department of Education Science and Training (2005) “Success for Boys”, Retrieved: 1 April 2005 from http://www.successforboys.edu.au/background.asp.

  • Epstein, D., J. Elwood, B. Hey & J. Maws (1999)Failing Boys: Issues in Gender and Achievement, Open University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, B. (2000)Boys, Girls and Achievement: Addressing the Classroom Issues, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1997)Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1995) From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a post-socialist age,New Left Review, vol. 212, pp. 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R. & P. Gilbert (1998)Masculinity Goes to School, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D (2003) Mapping transformations in educational subjectivities: working within and against discourse,International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol 7, no. 3, pp. 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holter, O. (1995) Family theory reconsidered, in T. Borchgrevink & O. Holter, eds.,Labour of Love: Beyond the Self-evidence of Everyday Life, pp. 99–129, Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2006) Pedagogies and critical reflection: key understandings for transformative gender justice,Gender and Education, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2005) A framework for best practice in boys’ education: key requisite knowledges and Productive Pedagogies,Pedagogy, Culture and Society, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddie, A. (2004) Working with boys’ peer cultures: Productive Pedagogies… productive boys,Curriculum Perspectives, vol. 24, no. 1, pp.20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., & L. Fitzclarence (1997) Masculinity, violence and schooling: challenging ‘poisonous’ pedagogies,Gender and Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., & S. Willis (1998)Answering Back, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1992) Critical frames in educational research: feminist and post-structural perspectives,Theory into Practice, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2003) Where to in gender policy in education after recuperative masculinity politics?International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & P. Douglas (1999)Men Engaging Feminisms, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., W. Martino, M. Mills & M. Bahr (2002)Addressing the Educational Needs of Boys — Strategies for Schools, Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2003) After the marketplace: evidence, social science and educational research,Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 30, no. 2. pp. 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNaughton, G. (2000)Rethinking Gender in Early Childhood Education, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W., B. Lingard & M. Mills (2004) Addressing the educational needs of boys: a question of teacher threshold knowledges?Gender and Education, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martino W. & M. Pallotta-Chiarolli (2005)Being Normal is the Only Way to be: Adolescent Perspectives on Gender and School, UNSW Press, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W. & M. Pallotta-Chiarolli (2003)So What’s a Boy?, Open University Press, Maidenhead.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. (2004a) Which girls, which boys? Gender, feminism and educational reform, pp. 165–196, in J. Allen, ed.,Sociology of Education, 3rd edition, Social Science Press, Southbank, Victoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. (2004b) Neo-liberal agendas and gender equity: from social justice to individual performance,Redress: Journal of the Association of Women Educators, vol. 13, no.3, pp. 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., W. Martino & B. Lingard (2004) Issues in the male teacher debate: masculinities, misogyny and homophobia,British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B. (2004) “Making Schools Better”, A speech by Dr Brendan Nelson at the Making Schools Better conference at The University of Melbourne, Retrieved: 1 June 2005 from http://www.dest.gov.au/ministers/media/nelson/2004/08/n901260804.asp.

  • Queensland State Education (2000)The New Basics Project Technical Paper, Education Queensland, Brisbane.

  • Rowe, K. (2004) Boys playing catch-up, The Australian, March 12, p.11.

  • Skelton, C. (2001)Schooling the Boys: Masculinities and Primary Education, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, A. (2003)The End of Equality, Random House, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. & M. Henry (2000) Challenges for equity policy in changing contexts,Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 27, no. 3, pp 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • The State of Queensland (Department of Education) (2001)The Queensland School Reform Longitudinal Study, The State of Queensland, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • The State of Queensland (Department of Education) (2003)The New Basics Project. Brisbane, The State of Queensland.

  • The State of Queensland (2002)A Guide to Productive Pedagogies: Classroom Reflection Manual, The State of Queensland, Brisbane.

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. (2003) The ‘boy turn’ in research on gender and education,Review of Educational Research, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keddie, A. A framework for gender justice: Evaluating the transformative capacities of three key Australian schooling initiatives. Aust. Educ. Res. 32, 83–102 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216828

Keywords

Navigation