Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of single oral doses of metoprolol in normal volunteers

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of three orally administered doses of metoprolol, a betaj adrenoceptor antagonist, on resting blood pressures, resting pulse rates and heart rates during maximum exercise have been compared with those of placebo in six healthy male volunteers.

The differences in blood pressures and pulse rates at rest were small and only statistically significant at isolated time points during the 24 hours study period. The reduction in exercise heart rates reached maximum values at 1.5 to 2 hours after drug administration and thereafter increased linearly with time. The zero-order rate constants for this process were similar for each of the three doses investigated.

The mean durations of beta blockade after oral administration of 50, 100 and 200 mg. were 13.2, 16.9 and 19.2 hours, respectively. An apparent linear relationship between exercise heart rate and logarithm of the drug concentration in plasma was observed for each dose studied.

The relationship between area under the plasma concentration curve and dose is statistically compatible with a linear function in the range 50 to 200 mg. The actual areas, however, suggest the possibility of an increased bioavailability for the higher dose.

The significance of these results is discussed in relation to the possible use of a single daily dosage regimen in the treatment of angina pectoris and hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borer J.S., Comerford M.B. and Sowton E. (1976). Assessment of Metoprolol a Cardioselective Beta-Blocking Agent during Chronic Therapy in Patients with Angina Pectoris. J. Int. Med. Res.,4, 15–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergstrand R.H., Vedin J.A., Wilhelmsson C.E. and Berglund G. (1976). Comparative Study of Metoprolol and Alpha-Methyldopa in Untreated Essential Hypertension. Europ. J. clin. Pharmacol.,10, 375–379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gatley M.S. (1968). To Be Taken as Directed. J. Roy. Coll. Gen. Practit.,16, 39–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris A.M., Woolard K.V. and Tweed J.A. (1976). A Study of Once Daily Tenormin (Atenolol) in Hypertension: Some Implications in Patient Compliance. J. Int. Med. Res.,4, 347–351.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson M., Morgan G. and Morgan T. (1976). The Effet on Blood Pressure of Beta-Adrenoceptor Blocking Drugs Administered Once Daily and Their Duration of Action When Therapy is Ceased. Br. J. Clin. Pharmac,3, 857–861.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kendall M.J., Mitchard M., West M., John V.A. and Ebbutt A.F. (1976). Factors Influencing the Absorption of Oxprenolol — A Pharmacokinetic Study. Europ. J. Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, 155–160.

  7. Jack D.B. and Riess W. (1974). Determination of Low Levels of Oxprenolol in Blood and Plasma by Gas-Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr.,88, 173–176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McHugh R.B., Sivanich G. and Geisser S. (1961). On the Evaluation of Personality Changes as Measured by Psychometric Test Profiles. Psychological Reports,7, 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Snedecor G.W. and Cochran W.G. (1968). Statistical Methods (Sixth Edition), Iowa State University Press, 299–338.

  10. Scheffe H. (1953). Contrasts in the Analysis of Variance. Biometrika,40, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hollander M. and Wolfe D.A. (1973). Non-parametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley, 138–158.

  12. Marascuilo L.A. and McSweeney M. Non-parametric Post Hoc Comparisons for Trend. Psychological Bulletin,67, 401–412.

  13. Hildebrand F.B. and McGraw-Hill (1956). Introduction to Numerical Analysis. New York, 75.

  14. Borg K.O., Carlsson E., Hoffmann K.-J., Jonsson T.-E., Thorin H. and Wallin B. (1975). Metabolism of Metoprolol-(3H) in Man, the Dog and the Rat. Acta pharmacoL et toxicol.,36, suppl. V, 125–135.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson B.F. (1971). The Mode of Action of Beta-Antagonist in Angina Pectoris. Postgrad. Med. J., suppl47, 41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma B., Meeian M.K., Galvin M.C., Tulpule A.T., Whitaker W. and Taylor S.H. (1970). Comparison of Adrenergic Beta-Blocking Drugs in Angina Pectoris. Brit, med. J.,111, 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ablad B., Ervik M., Hallgren I., Johnson G. and Sowell L. (1972). Pharmacological Effects and Serum Levels of Orally Administered Alprenolol in Man. Europ. J. clin. Pharmacol.,5, 44–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davidson C, Thadani U., Taylor S.H., Hess H. and Riess W. (1976). Pharmalogjcal Studies with Slow-Release Formulations of Oxprenolol in Man. Europ. J. clin. Pharmacol.,10, 189–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Levy G. (1966). Kinetics of Pharmacological Effects. Clin. Pharmac. Ther.,7, 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bengtsson C., Johnsson G. and Regardh C.-G. (1975). Plasma Levels and Effects of Metoprolol on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Hypertensive Patients After and Acute Dose and Between Two Doses During Long-Term Treatment. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.,17, 400–408.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnsson G., Regardh G.C. and Sowell L. (1975). Combined Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies in Man of the Adrenergic β1-Receptor Antagonist Metoprolol. Acta Pharmacol, and toxicol.,36, suppl. V, 31–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kendall, M.J., Brown, D., Grieve, A. et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of single oral doses of metoprolol in normal volunteers. European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics 2, 73–80 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189287

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189287

Key words

Navigation