Skip to main content
Log in

Genetical studies in pears

IV. Pollen-tube growth and incompatibility

  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1. Self-incompatibility in diploid pears is due to arrested pollen-tube growth. Three days after pollination the tubes are approximately one-third of the way down the style and their ends are swollen.

2. In a cross between two diploid varieties compatible and incompatible tubes are present indicating gametic determination of incompatibility.

3. The somatically doubled autotetraploid Fertility is self-fertile, but both compatible and incompatible tubes are present in selfed styles. Compatible tubes of the tetraploid grow faster than compatible tubes of diploids both in tetraploid and in diploid styles.

4. The breakdown of the self-sterility mechanism following chromosome doubling is reviewed and found to be of fairly widespread occurrence in plants. A working hypothesis to explain the effect of polyploidy on self-sterility is given: it is based on the assumption thatS 1 S 2 pollen is compatible andS 1 S 1 andS 2 S 2 pollen incompatible inS 1 S 1 S 2 S 2 styles.

5. Pollen tubes of the diploid variety Beurré Bedford grow as fast as those of a tetraploid variety, penetrate the style and enter the embryosac; but only rarely do they effect fertilization. Beurré Bedford pollen grains are unreduced pollen mother cells with haploid, diploid, triploid, and tetraploid nuclei. The high rate of growth of the pollen tubes is due to the nature of the pollen cell and the failure to fertilize the eggs to the lack of balance between the sperm nuclens and the cell.

6. The result of this normal pollen-tube growth without fertilization is the formation of seedless fruits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. &Sax, K. (1934). A cytological analysis of self-sterility inTradescantia.Bot. Gaz.43, 609–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asami, Y. &Hayami, F. (1934). The growth of pollen tubes in incompatible pollinations of Japanese pears.J. horst. Ass. Jap.5, 222–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, A. F. (1938). Chromosome investigations.Rep. Dep. Genet. Carn. Inst. Wash. for 1937–8, pp. 35–40.

  • Blakeslee, A. F. &Avery, A. G. (1937). Methods of inducing chromosome doubling in plants by treatment with colchicine.Science,86, 408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, M. B. (1923). Report on tests of self-sterility and cross-incompatibility in plums, cherries, and apples at the John Innes Horticultural Institution.J. Pom. Hort. Sci.3, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, M. B. &Lewis, D. (1941). Genetical studies in pears. III. Incompatibility and sterility.J. Genet.43, 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, M. B. &Thomas, P. T. (1939). Genetical studies in pears. I. The origin and behaviour of a new giant form.J. Genet.37, 287–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, M. B.,Jenkins, E. W. &Dunning, R. G. (1936). Sterility in pears.Bull. Verm. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 408, pp. 1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, C. D. (1939).Evolution of Genetic Systems. Cambridge.

  • East, E. M. (1934). Norms of pollen-tube growth in incompatible matings of self-sterile plants.Proc. nat. Acad. Sci., Wash.,20, 225–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, S. (1938). The genetics of self-incompatibility inOenothera organensis.Genetics,23, 190–202.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, S. (1940).

  • Heilborn, D. (1938). Pollen-tube growth in self-pollinated flowers of diploid apple varieties.Ann. Agric. Coll. Sweden,5, 165–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, W. J. C. (1930). Incompatibility in polyploids.Genetica,12, 268–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levan, A. (1936). Polyploidy and self-sterility inAllium.Hereditas, Lund,22, 278–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raptopoulos, T. (1941). Pollen tube growth studies in cherries.J. Genet.42, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sears, E. R. (1937). Cytological phenomena concerned with self-sterility in the flowering plants.Genetics,22, 130–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shamel, A. D. (1937). A large-fruited bud mutation of the Winter Nelis pear.J. Hered.28, 350–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upcott, M. B. &Philp, J. (1939). The genetic structure ofTulipa. IV. Balance, selection and fertility.J. Genet.38, 91–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W. &Latimer, L. P. (1938). Incompatibility of Early McIntosh and Cortland apples.Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.36, 284–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, S. (1934). Physiological research on self-incompatibility inPetunia violacea.Bull. imp. Coll. Agric. Morioka,20, 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1939). Parthenocarpy induced by stimulation of pollination in some higher plants.Mem. Fac. Sci. Agric. Taikoku Univ. 27, 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, D., Modlibowska, I. Genetical studies in pears. Journ. of Genetics 43, 211–222 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982754

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982754

Keywords

Navigation