Abstract
DESIGN RESEARCH has grown in importance since it was first conceptualized in the early 90s, but it has not been adopted for research in instructional technology in higher education to any great extent. Many researchers continue to conduct studies that principally seek to determine the effectiveness of the delivery medium, rather than the instructional strategies and tasks. This article explores the various incentives for conducting research on the impact of computing and other technologies in higher education, examines the social relevance of that research, and recommends design research as a particularly appropriate approach to socially responsible inquiry. A description of the characteristics of design research is given, together with an argument for the more widespread adoption of this approach to enhance the quality and usefulness of research in computers and other technologies in education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen K.L., Galvis, D.L., & Katz R.V. (2004)Evaluation of CDs and chewing gum in teaching dental anatomy. Paper presented at the International Association for Dental Research 82nd General Session and Exhibition. Retrieved June 17, 2004, from http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2004Hawaii/techprogram/abstract_40091.htm
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24.
Boyer, E.L. (1990).Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000).How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Carroll, J.B. (1973). Basic and applied research in education: Definitions, distinctions, and implications. In H. S. Broudy, R. H. Ennis, & L. I. Krimerman (Eds.),Philosophy of educational research (pp. 108–121). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Casti, J.L. (1989).Paradigms lost: Images of man in the mirror of science. New York: William Morrow.
Clark, R. E. (Ed.). (2001).Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schäuble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990a). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990b). Technology and the design of generative learning environments.Educational Technology, 31(5), 34–40.
Corey, S. (1953).Action research to improve school practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Creswell, J.W. (2003).Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Cronbach, L.J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 30, 116–126.
Cuban, L. (2001).Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Desforges, C. (2001, August).Familiar challenges and new approaches: Necessary advances in theory and methods in research on teaching and learning. The Desmond Nuttall/Carfax Memorial Lecture, British Educational Research Association (BERA) Annual Conference, Cardiff. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.tlrp.org/ acadpub/Desforges2000a.pdf
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
Dewey, J. (1938).Experience and education. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learning comprehension, control and style.Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349.
Exploratorium. (1998).A description of inquiry. Retrieved August 19, 2004, from http://www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/about/inquiry.html
Fabos, B., & Young, M.D. (1999). Telecommunications in the classroom: Rhetoric versus reality.Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 217–259.
Farley, F.H. (1982). The future of educational research.Educational Researcher, 11(8), 11–19.
Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R.J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research.Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4–14.
Gorard, S., Roberts, K., & Taylor, C. (2004). What kind of creature is a design experiment?British Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 577–590.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2004). Designing authentic activities in web-based courses.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 3–29.
Kelly, A.E. (2003). Research as design.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.
Lagemann, E.C. (2000).An elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education.Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.
McGrath, B. (2004, February 9). Chew on.New Yorker [Electronic version. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/ ?040209ta_talk_mcgrath
Moxley, J.M. (1992).Publish, don’t perish: The scholar’s guide to academic writing and publishing. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
National Research Council. (1999).Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Newman, D. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers.Educational Researcher, 19(3), 8–13.
Noble, D.F. (2001).Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Olson, D.R. (2004). The triumph of home over experience in the search for “what works”: A response to Slavin.Educational Researcher, 33(1), 24–26.
Reason P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001).Handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Reeves, T.C. (2003). Storm clouds on the digital education horizon.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 3–26.
Reeves, T.C. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of learner control research.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(2), 39–46.
Richey, R.C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 23–38.
Ross, S. M., Morrison, G.R., & Lowther, D.L. (2005). Using experimental methods in higher education research,Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 39–64.
Russell, T.L. (1999).The no significant difference phenomenon. Montgomery, AL: International Distance Education Certification Center.
Saettler, P. (1990).The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Shulman, L. (2001). Inventing the future. In P. Hutchings (Ed).Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications.
Silverman, F. (1999).Publishing for tenure and beyond. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Slavin, R. E. (2002) Evidence-based educational policies: Transforming educational practice and research.Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.
Thyer, B. (1994).Successful publishing in scholarly journals — Survival skills for scholars. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, N. Nieveen, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, & T. Plomp, (Eds.),Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 1–14). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zemsky, R., & Massy, W.F. (2004).Thwarted innovation: What happened to eleaming and why. Final Report for The Weatherstation Project of The Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved July 17, 2004, from http:// www.irhe.upenn.edu/Docs/Jun2004/ThwartedInnovation.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reeves, T.C., Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. J. Comput. High. Educ. 16, 96–115 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961476
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961476