Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice

  • Published:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE is to provide direction to those entertaining a developmental research project. There are two categories of developmental research, both of which are examined here. The two types vary in terms of the extent to which the conclusions resulting from the research are generalizable or contextually specific. This article describes developmental research in terms of the traditional stages of planning, conducting, and reporting a research project—problem definition, literature reviews, and research procedures. Examples of adapting a literature review to a developmental study are identified. Problem definition procedures encompass focusing on and framing the problem, and identifying the limitations of the research. Research procedures are adapted to developmental studies, particularly with respect to identifying the study’s participants, creating a research design, and collecting and analyzing the data. Finally, issues with respect to reporting developmental research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamski, A.J. (1998). The development of a systems design model for job performance aids: A qualitative developmental study. (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1998).Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 59(03), 789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras, I. (1993). Developing and assessing practicing spoken French: A multimedia program for improving speaking skills.Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(4), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry, M.D., Frick, T.W., & Hansen, L. (1997). User-centered design and usability testing of a web site: An illustrative case study.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K.M., Savenye, W.C., & Sullivan, H.J. (2002). Formative evaluation of computer-based training for a university financial system.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.S., & Richey, R.C. (2000). Rapid prototyping in action: A developmental study.Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. D., Brinkerhoff, I., Koroghlanian, C., Brewer, S., Ku, H., & MacPherson-Coy, A. (2000). The foundations of educational technology: A needs assessment.Tech Trends, 44(6), 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S. (2002). Computer-based support for science education materials development in Africa: Exploring potentials. (Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Twente (The Netherlands, 2001).Dissertation Abstracts International-C, 63(03), 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.H. (2000). Evaluating training programs for organizational impact. (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 2000).Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 61(03), 840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R.C. (1997) Research on instructional development.Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R.C. (1998) The pursuit of useable knowledge in instructional technology.Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(4), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, R.C., Klein, J., & Nelson, W. (2004) Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. Jonassen (Ed.)Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 1099–1130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seels, B. (1994).An advisor’s view: Lessons learned from developmental research dissertations. A paper presented at the 1994 Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology in Nashville, TN.

  • Seels, B.B., & Richey, R.C. (1994).Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellnut, B.J. (1999). The influence of designer and contextual variables on the incorporation of motivational components to instructional design and the perceived success of a project. (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 1999).Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 60(06), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, M.W. (2002). The construction and validation of an instructional design model for incorporating multiple intelligences. (Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 2001).Dissertation Abstracts International-A, 62(12), 4135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wayne State University, USA

    Rita C. Richey

  2. Arizona State University, USA

    James D. Klein

Authors
  1. Rita C. Richey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James D. Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richey, R.C., Klein, J.D. Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. J. Comput. High. Educ. 16, 23–38 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961473

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02961473

Keywords

Search

Navigation