Skip to main content
Log in

Antibiotic activity of pteridophytes

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The occurrence of antibiotic activity in the extracts of 114 species of pteridophytes (27 families, 61 genera) has been surveyed. The plants were extracted in water, methanol, 70% ethanol, acetone and ether and assayed against 3 gram-positive, I acid-fast and 5 gram-negative bacteria and 3 fungal plant pathogens. Sixty-seven ferns and 6 fern allies, representing 64% of the samples examined, were antibiotic ally active. The active substances were in most cases antibacterial and only 3 possessed antifungal activity. Thirty-three species were inhibitory to gram-positive bacteria alone, 9 exclusively against gram-negative bacteria and 15 to both. Twenty species were inhibitory to penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 16 against Mycobacterium phlei, 24 against Salmonella typhi, 16 against Vibrio cholerae and 3 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Only Dryopteris coch-leata was active against both bacteria and fungi. Five other species of Dryopteris showed remarkable antibacterial activity. The ferns of “Adiantum group” were found to be particularly active against gram-positive bacteria. The polypodiaceous ferns constitute a rich group of which Microsorium alternifolium, Leptochillus decurrens, Polypodium irioides, Pyrrosia mannii and Phymatodes ebenipes deserve special mention. Several thelypteroid, davalloid and athyroid ferns were also fairly active.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Anonymous. 1959. Medicinal ferns of India. Bull. Nat. Bot. Gard. 29: 1–36.

  • Azarowicz, E. N., J. E. Hughes, and C. L. Perkins. 1952. Antibiotics in plants of Southern California active againstMycobacterium tuberculosis 607 andAspergillus niger. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy 2: 532–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, R. D. 1974. Studies on antibiotic activity of bryophytes and pteridophytes. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. Kalyani, Kalyani, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and S. P. Sen. 1979. Antibiotic activity of bryophytes. Bryologist 82: 141–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhakuni, D. S., M. L. Dhar, M. M. Dhar, B. N. Dhawan, and B. N. Mehrotra. 1969. Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part II. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 7: 250–262.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,—,—,—, B. Gupta, and R. C. Srimal. 1971. Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part III. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 9: 91–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkill, I. H. 1935. A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula. Vols. I and II. Crown Agents for the Colonies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caius, J. F. 1935-36. The medicinal and poisonous ferns of India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 38: 341–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, H. J., H. G. Douglas, and J. Robertson. 1948. Antibacterial substances separated from plants. J. Bacteriol. 55: 240–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, R. N., I. C. Chopra, K. L. Handa, and L. D. Kapoor. 1958. Medicinal ferns.In Chopra’s Indigenous Drugs of India. 2nd ed. U. N. Dhar and Sons, Calcutta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chunekar, K. C., and G. S. Pandey. 1969. Bhavprakash Nighantu (In Hindi). The Chowkhamba Vidya Bhawan, Varanasi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, W. A., and L. Van Der Pijl. 1949. Over antibiotische werking, speciaal van hogere planten, met nieuwe resultaten bij indonesische planten. Chron. Nat. 105: 8–15.In Biol. Abstr. 24: 656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creasey, W. A. 1969. Antitumoral activity of the fernCibotium schiedei. Nature 222: 1281–1282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhar, M. L., M. M. Dhar, B. N. Dhawan, B. N. Mehrotra, and C. Roy. 1968. Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part I. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 6: 232–247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,—,—,—, R. C. Srimal, and J. S. Tandon. 1973. Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part IV. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 11: 43–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —, B. N. Dhawan, C. R. Prasad, R. P. Rastogi, K. K. Singh, and J. S. Tandon. 1974. Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part V. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 12: 512–523.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhawan, B. N., G. K. Patnaik, R. P. Rastogi, K. K. Singh, and J. S. Tandon. 1977. Screening of Indian plants for biological activity: Part VI. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 15: 208–219.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth, N. R., L. K. Henry, G. H. Svoboda, R. N. Blomster, M. J. Yates, and K. L. Euler. 1966. Biological and phytochemical evaluation of plants. I. Biological test procedures and results from two hundred accessions. Lloydia 29: 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—,—,—, H. H. S. Fong, M. W. Quimby, and M. J. Yates. 1968. Biological and phytochemical evaluation of plants. II. Test results from an additional two hundred accessions. Lloydia 31: 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, H. H. S., N. R. Farnsworth, L. K. Henry, G. H. Svoboda, and M. J. Yates. 1972. Biological and phytochemical evaluation of plants. X. Test results from a third two-hundred accessions. Lloydia 35: 35–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freerksen, E., and R. Bönicke. 1951. Über antibakterielle Prinzipien in höheren Pflanzen. I. Z. Hyg. 132: 417–449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliver, K. 1947. Effect of plant extracts on the germination of the conidia ofVenturia inaequalis. Ann. Appl. Biol. 34: 136–143.In Chem. Abstr. 42: 1689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gram, E., and A. Weber. 1952. Plant Diseases. Dennis, R. W. G., ed. Macdonald, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell, J. N. 1968. Plants used against cancer: A survey. Lloydia 31: 71–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1970. Plants used against cancer: A survey. Lloydia 33: 97–194, 288–392.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1971. Plants used against cancer: A survey. Lloydia 34: 386–425.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, L. 1947. Survey of higher plants for presence of antibacterial substances. Bot. Gaz. 108: 408–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, A., F. Alvarado, J. Szöcs, Z. N. De Alvarado, and G. Padilla. 1967. Metabolic effects of calagualine, an antitumoral saponin ofPolypodium leucotomos. Nature 214: 1256–1258.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. E. 1952. Survey of antibiotics in the wild green plants of Southern California. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy 2: 487–491.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiu, J. 1966. A survey of some medicinal plants of Mexico for selected biological activities. Lloydia 29: 250–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, K., and Y. Noro. 1965. Pharmacognostical studies on Chinese drug “Gu-sui-bu”: I. Consideration on “gu-sui-bu” in old herbals (Pharmacognostical studies on fern drugs XI). Syoy- akugaku Zasshi 19: 25–31.In Biol. Abstr. 49: 86830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirtikar, K. R., B. D. Basu, and an I.C.S. (Retd.). 1935. Indian Medicinal Plants (Cryptogamia). Vol. IV. 2nd Ed. Revised by Blatter, E., J. F. Caius, and K. S. Mhaskar. Lalit Mohan Basu, Allahabad, India.

  • Macdonald, R. E., and C. J. Bishop. 1953. Phloretin: A further survey of plants for antibacterial substances. Canadian J. Bot. 31: 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, G. C., and A. L. Pates. 1952. Occurrence of antimicrobial substances in chlorophyllose plants growing in Florida. Bot. Gaz. 113: 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruzzella, J. C. 1961. Antimicrobial substances from ferns. Nature 191: 518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W. C. 1959. British Parasitic Fungi, p. 17. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, L. G. 1959. Antimicrobial activity of vascular plants. Econ. Bot. 13: 281–318.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pates, A. L., and G. C. Madsen. 1955. Occurrence of antimicrobial substances in chlorophyllose plants growing in Florida II. Bot. Gaz. 116: 250–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri, H. S. 1970. Indian pteridophytes used in folk remedies. Amer. Fern J. 60: 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D. W., P. Weatherwax, and L. S. McClung. 1945. Antibacterial substances from plants collected in Indiana. J. Bacteriol. 49: 611–615.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., and P. Nandi. 1951. Antibiotics from the pteridophytes. Sei. & Cult. 16: 328–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, F. A. 1955. Antibiotics.In Modern Methods of Plant Analysis. Vol. III. Eds., Paech, K., and M. V. Tracey. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C. F., F. R. Koniuszky, E. F. Rogers, J. Shavel, N. R. Easton, E. A. Kaczka, F. A. Kuehl, R. F. Phillips, A. Walti, K. Flokers, C. Malanga, and A. C. Seeler. 1947. Survey of plants for antimalarial activity. Lloydia 10: 145–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. L. 1869. Panjab Plants. Gov. Printing Press, Lahore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, G. 1889–1893. A Dictionary of the Economic Products of India. Vols. I-VI, 1st Ed., 2nd reprint, 1972, Cosmo Publications, Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Wealth of India: A Dictionary of Indian Raw Materials and Industrial Products. 1948–1977. Vols. I–XI. Council Sci. Ind. Res., New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, R. C. 1956. Potter’s New Cyclopaedia of Botanical Drugs and Preparations. 7th ed. Re-edited and Enlarged by Wren, R. W. Sir Issac Pitman & Sons for Potter & Clarke, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. C., H. H. Chang, and T. C. Weng. 1953. Influence of several Chinese drugs on the growth of some pathogenic organisms: Preliminary report. J. Formosan. Med. Assoc. 52: 109–112.In Chem. Abstr. 47, 8175 b.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Banerjee, R.D., Sen, S.P. Antibiotic activity of pteridophytes. Econ Bot 34, 284–298 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858649

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858649

Keywords

Navigation