Skip to main content
Log in

Factors influencing reconditioning of Russet Burbank potatoes

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies were made to determine factors which influence reconditioning of Russet Burbank tubers. Tubers from plants grown under low fertility were more difficult to recondition than tubers from plants adequately fertilized. Low specific gravity potatoes were also more difficult to recondition than high specific gravity potatoes even though the initial sugar content was approximately equal. The stem portion of Russet Burbank tubers lost considerably less sugars than the bud portion during the reconditioning process. It appears that factors which are responsible for high sugar development are also responsible for difficulty in sugar loss. Results also indicate greater difficulty in reconditioning early in the storage period with the loss of sugars becoming easier as the storage season progressed into spring.

Resumen

Fueron conducidos estudios para determinar los factores que influyen el reacondicionamiento de tubérculos Russet Burbank. Tubérculos de plantas crecidos bajo condiciones de baja fertilidad fueron más difíciles de reacondicionar que los tubérculos de plantas adecuadamente abonados. Papas de baja gravedad específica también fueron más difíciles de reacondicionar que las de gravedad específica alta, aunque el contenido inicial de azúcar fue aproximadamente igual. El tallo de tubérculos Russet Burbank perdió considerablemente menos azúcar que la yema durante el proceso de reacondicionamiento. Parece que los factores responsables de desarrollar alta azúcar también son responsables de la dificultad de pérdida de azúcar.

Los resultados también indican más difficultad de reacondicionamiento temprano en el perído de almacenamiento con la pérdida de azúcar llegando a ser más fácil con el progreso de la campaña de almacenamiento en primavera.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Appleman, C. O. 1912. Changes in potatoes during storage. Md Agric Exp Stn Bull 167: 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denny, F. E. and N. C. Thornton. 1940. Factors for color in the production of potato chips. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 11: 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —. 1941. Potato varieties: Sugar forming characteristics of tubers in cold storage and suitability for production of potato chips. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 12: 217–252.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. -.1942. The third year’s results on storage of potato tubers in relation to sugar content and color of potato chips. Contrib Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research.

  5. Iritani, W. M., L. Weiler, and T. S. Russell. 1973. Relative differences in sugar content of basal and apical portions of Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J 50: 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  6. —. 1976. Relationship of specific gravity to sugar accumulation in stored Norgold and Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J 53: 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. -.1977. The influence of low fertility and vine killing on sugar development in apical and basal portions of Russet Burbank potatoes. Am Potato J (In press).

  8. Isherwood, Frederick A. 1976. Mechanism of starch-sugar interconversion inSolatium tuberosum. Phytochemistry 15:33–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyamoto, T., E. J. Wheeler and S. T. Dexter. 1958. Ventilation of chipping potatoes during the conditioning period. Am Potato J 35: 778–783.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohad, Itzhak, Ilan Friedberg, Zvi Ne’Eman and Michael Schramn. 1971. The fate of the amyloplast membranes during maturation and storage of potato tubers. Plant Physiol 47:465–477.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Samotus, B., M. Niedzwiedz, A. Kolodziij, M. Leja and B. Czajkowsk. 1974. Storage and reconditioning of tubers of Polish potato varieties and strains. II. Changes in sugar level in potato tubers of different varieties and strains during reconditioning cold stored potatoes. Potato Res 17:82–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwimmer, S., A. Bevenue, W. Weston, and A. L. Potter. 1954. Survey of major and minor sugar and starch components of the white potato. Agric Food Chem 2:1284–1289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shekhar, V. C. 1977. Factors influencing starch to sugar conversion in Russet Burbank potatoes. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Singh, R. P., D. Heldman, B. F. Cargill, and C. Bedford. 1974. Factors influencing reconditioning of potatoes for chips. Paper No. 74-6511. Winter meeting ASAE, Chicago, IL.

  15. Smith, Ora. 1959.Potato Processing. The Avi Publishing Co., Inc., Westport, CT. 179p.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Talburt, W. F. and Ora Smith. 1967.Potato Processing. The Avi Publishing Co., Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yamaguchi, M. et al. 1959. Effect of certain areas of production and storage on chipping quality, chemical composition and specific gravity of California potatoes. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 74:649–660.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Scientific Paper No. 4927. College of Agriculture Research Center, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. Project No. 1949. Financed in part by the Washington State Potato Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iritani, W.M., Weiler, L.D. Factors influencing reconditioning of Russet Burbank potatoes. American Potato Journal 55, 425–430 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852145

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852145

Key Words

Navigation