Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A note on the apparent inconsistency among measurements of threshold pion interactions

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965)

Summary

The apparent inconsistency among threshold pion interactions is resolved by the use of extrapolation procedures for charge exchange and photoproduction amplitudes more in accord with theory than conventional linear extrapolations.

Riassunto

Si fa vedere che l’apparente inconsistenza tra interazioni di pioni a bassa energia può venire risolta se si fa uso di estrapolazioni suggerite dalla teoria per i processi di scambio carica e di fotoproduzione invece delle solite estrapolazioni lineari.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Bethe andF. de Hoffmann:Mesons and Fields (Evanston), Vol. II:a) p. 99;b) p. 174.

  2. J. M. Cassels:Proceedings 7th Rochester Conference, (1957), Sect. II, p. 1;J. M. Cassels, G. Fidecaro, A. M. Wetherell andJ. R. Wormald:Proc. Phys. Soc., A70, 405 (1957).

  3. A. M. Baldin:Nuovo Cimento,8, 569 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See ref. (2).

  5. J. Orear:Nuovo Cimento,4, 856 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Bernardini andE. L. Goldwasser:Phys. Rev.,49, 729 (1954);95, 857 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Beneventano, G. Bernardini, D. Carlson Lee, G. Stoppini andL. Tau:Nuovo Cimento,4, 323 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. F. Chew, M. L. Goldberger, F. Low andY. Nambu:Phys. Rev.,106, 1345 (1057).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. G. F. Chew andF. Low:Phys. Rev.,101, 1579 (1956). The importance of this term in the analysis of photoproduction of charged pions has been stressed byM. J. Moravcsik:Phys. Rev.,104, 1451 (1956).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. G. F. Chew:Phys. Rev.,95, 1669 (1954).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. H. Malmberg andC. S. Robinson:Phys. Rev.,109, 158 (1958);E. Knapp, W. Imhof, R. W. Kenney andPerez Mendez:Phys. Rev.,107, 323 (1957).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Kroll andM. Ruderman:Phys. Rev.,93, 233 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. E. Leiss, C. S. Robinson andS. Penner:Phys. Rev.,98, 201 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. The deuterium π−/π+ ratio experiments and Baldin’s analysis are not in complete agreement at slightly higher energies, according toBernardini (private communication), but the extrapolation to 1.87 at threshold does not seem to be justified.

  15. G. Chew, M. L. Goldberger, F. Low andY. Nambu:Phys. Rev.,106, 1337 (1957); cf. also:R. Oehme:Phys. Rev.,10, 1503 (1955);102, 1174 (1956);A. Salam:Proceedings CERN Conf. (1956), p. 176.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Cini andS. Fubini:Nuovo Cimento,3, 764 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Puppi andA. Stanghellini:Nuovo Cimento,5, 1305 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. I. Mukhin et al.:Proc. CERN Conf. (1956), p. 204;G. Ferrari et al.:Proc. CERN Conf. (1956), p. 230;M. H. Alston et al.:Proc. CERN Conf., (1956), p. 236;D. E. Nagle et al.:Proc. CERN Conf. (1956), p. 238.

  19. W. Spry:Phys. Rev.,95, 1295 (1954);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Tinlot andA. Roberts:Phys. Rev.,95, 137 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Bodansky, A. Sachs andJ. Steinberger:Phys. Rev.,93, 1367 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. M. Baldin andP. K. Kabir:Nuovo Cimento,9, 547 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. M. Ruderman (John Simon Guggenheim Foundation Fellow on leave)

    Present address: University of California, Berkeley

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto di Fisica e Scuola di Perfezionamento dell’Università, Roma

    M. Cini, R. Gatto, E. L. Goldwasser & M. Ruderman (John Simon Guggenheim Foundation Fellow on leave)

  2. Istituto Nazionale di Fiscia Nucleare, Sezione di Roma, Italy

    M. Cini, R. Gatto, E. L. Goldwasser & M. Ruderman (John Simon Guggenheim Foundation Fellow on leave)

Authors
  1. M. Cini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Gatto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. L. Goldwasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Ruderman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

On sabbatical leave from the University of Illinois with grants from Guggenheim Foundation and Fulbright Program.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cini, M., Gatto, R., Goldwasser, E.L. et al. A note on the apparent inconsistency among measurements of threshold pion interactions. Nuovo Cim 10, 243–258 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732482

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732482

Search

Navigation