Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of osmotic pressure on neurogenesis in cultures of chick embryo spinal cords

  • Published:
In Vitro Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The osmotic pressure of the medium in stoppered, roller tube cultures increased by an average of 17±6 mOsm per kg of water during 3 days of incubation at 37°C irrespective of the initial osmolality (280 to 340 mOsm) of the medium. The increase was apparently due to evaporation of water from the medium into the gas phase of the roller tube.

This observation led us to study the effect of osmotic pressure on neuronal differentiation in cultures of chick embryo spinal cords. Spinal cords were excised from stage 16 to 19 (2.5 to 3 days of incubation) or stage 36 (10 days) chick embryos and cultured as fragments on collagen-coated cover slips in roller tubes at 37°C for 21 days. The medium was adjusted to 283±3, 300±3, 323±3, or 342±3 mOsm per kg with saturated choline chloride solution or distilled water.

The results indicate that the nature of the neuronal differentiation in vitro was not altered by the osmolality of the medium. The proportion of cultures containing neurons was influenced by osmolality. In the 300±3 mOsm medium, 75% of all the stage 36 cultures initiated contained neurons, and 52% of all the stage 16 to 19 cultures initiated contained neurons. In the other media the proportion of neuron-containing cultures was lower. Two conclusions were drawn. Neurogenesis in cultures of embryonic chick spinal cord fragments is sensitive to an increase in the initial osmotic pressure of the medium as small as 20 mOsm above the optimal 300 mOsm. As a result of the 17 mOsm increase which always occurred in the culture medium between feedings, the optimum osmolality for neuronal development is in fact a range, from 300 to 317 mOsm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellison, M. L., and J. W. Lash. 1971. Environmental enhancement ofin vitro chondrogenesis. Dev. Biol. 26: 486–496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Slavinski, E. A., and N. Auersperg. 1974. Propagation in vitro of functional rat adrenal cortical cells: modifications of the differentiated state by culture conditions. In Vitro 9: 260–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Waymouth, C. 1970. Osmolality of mammalian blood and media for culture of mammalian cells. In Vitro 6: 109–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamburger, V., and H. L. Hamilton. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88: 49–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bornstein, M. B. 1958. Reconstituted rat-tail collagen used as substrate for tissue cultures on coverslips in Maximow slides and roller tubes. Lab. Invest. 7: 134–137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Scott, B. S., and K. C. Fisher. 1971. Effect of choline, high potassium, and low sodium on the number of neurons in cultures of dissociated chick ganglia. Exp. Neurol. 31: 183–188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, S. U. 1971. Demonstration of neurofibrillary degeneration induced by anoxia on spinal motor neuronsin vitro. Experientia 27: 264–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Allerand, C. D. 1971. Patterns of neuronal differentiation in developing cultures of neonatal mouse cerebellum: a living and silver impregnation study. J. Comp. Neurol. 142: 167–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lyser, K. M. 1972. The differentiation of glial cells and glia limitans in organ cultures of chick spinal cord. In Vitro 8: 77–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1967.Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 593 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scott, B. S. 1971. Effect of potassium on neuron survival in cultures of dissociated human nervous tissue. Exp. Neurol. 30: 297–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scott, B. S., and K. C. Fisher. 1970. Potassium concentration and numbers of neurons in cultures of dissociated ganglia. Exp Neurol. 27: 16–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mains, R. E., and P. H. Patterson. 1973. Primary cultures of dissociated symathetic neurons. I. Establishment of long-term growth in culture and studies of differentiated properties. J. Cell Biol. 59: 329–345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Grabowski, C. T. 1966. Physiological changes in the bloodstream of chick embryos exposed to teratogenic doses of hypoxia. Dev. Biol. 13: 199–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Howard, E. 1953. Some effects of NaCl concentration on the development of early chick blastoderms in culture. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 41: 237–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Foelix, R. F., and R. W. Oppenheim. 1973. Synaptogenesis in the avian embryo: ultra-structure and possible behavioral correlates. In: G. Gottlieb (Ed.),Studies on the Development of Behavior and the Nervous System, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 103–139.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hamburger, V. 1948. The mitotic patterns in the spinal cord of the chick embryo and their relation to histogenetic processes. J. Comp. Neurol. 88: 221–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamburger, V. 1958. Regression versus peripheral control of differentiation in motor hypoplasia. Am. J. Anat. 102: 365–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hughes, A. F. W. 1955. The development of the neural tube of the chick embryo. A study with the ultraviolet microscope. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 3: 303–325.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Levi-Montalcini, R. 1950. The origin and development of the visceral system in the spinal cord of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 86: 253–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Levi-Montalcini, R. 1965. Growth and differentiation in the nervous system. In: J. M. Allen (Ed.),The Nature of Biological Diversity, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, pp. 261–295.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hamburger, V. 1973. Anatomical and physiological basis of embryonic motility in birds and mammals. In: G. Gottlieb (Ed.)Studies on the Development of Behavior and the Nervous System, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 52–76.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lyser, K. M. 1971. Early differentiation of the chick embryo spinal cord in organ culture: light and electron microscopy. Anat. Rec. 169: 45–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, S. U., and E. Wenger. 1972.De novo formation of synapses in cultures of chick neural tube. Nature New Biol. 236: 152–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lewis, M. R., and W. H. Lewis. 1911. The cultivation of tissues from chick embryos in solutions of NaCl, KCl, and NaHCO3. Anat. Rec. 5: 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis, W. H., and M. R. Lewis. 1912. The cultivation of chick tissues in media of known chemical composition. Anat. Rec. 6: 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fish, D. C., J. P. Dobbs, and J. M. Elliott. 1973. Effect of osmotic pressure, Na+/K+ ratio and medium concentration on the enzyme activity and growth of L cells in suspension culture. In Vitro 9: 108–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gemmel, R. T., and B. D. Stacy. 1973. Effects of ruminal hyperosmolality on the ultrastructure of ruminal epithelium and their relevance to sodium transport. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 58: 315–323.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rennels, M., and W. Hild. 1965. Morphological alterations in mammalian neurons in vitro in response to hypertonic solutions. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 67: 620–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fisher, K. R. S., and E. L. Wenger. 1973. The effect of osmotic pressure on in vitro neurogenesis is cultures of young chick embryo spinal cords. Proc. Can. Fed. Soc. Biol. 16: 70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by research grant M.A. 4235 from the Medical Research Council (MRC) of Canada to Dr. S. Fedoroff. K. R. S. Fisher was supported by a Post-Doctoral Fellowship from the MRC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisher, K.R.S., Fedoroff, S. & Wenger, E.L. Effect of osmotic pressure on neurogenesis in cultures of chick embryo spinal cords. In Vitro 11, 329–337 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616368

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02616368

Key words

Navigation