Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

EEA stapler for mid-rectum carcinoma

Review of recent literature and own initial experience

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Over a three-year period, 1980–82, 79 per cent of our patients with rectal cancer were treated with the intention of cure, and sphincter-saving procedures were performed in 62 per cent of these cases. This report concerns 21 patients with mid-rectum cancer operated on with low anterior resection and extraperitoneal EEA-stapled anastomosis. Nine patients had Dukes' stage A tumors, seven had stage B, and five had stage C tumors. An 86-year-old woman died in the sixth postoperative week, and a 74-year-old man died after 20 months with a probable recurrence. Nineteen patients are currently alive 4 to 40 months postoperatively, with no overt signs of recurrence. We cannot confirm recent alarming reports on a significant incidence of early local recurrence. Routine Gastrografin® enemas were performed and offered very little in terms of clinical guidance. Significant anastomotic leakage occurred in four patients, although without clinical symptoms or the need for fecal diversion. Despite initially intact anastomoses in 13 patients, pelvic sepsis with late dehiscence developed in three, all of whom required fecal diversion. The clinical leak rate was thus 3 of 21, 14 per cent, and the total incidence of leakage 7 of 21, 33 per cent. We performed routine colostomy on the first three patients but, in retrospect, believe this was unnecessary. Only one of the 19 survivors still has a colostomy, due to a benign anastomotic stricture. We consider anterior resection of mid-rectum carcinoma with EEA-stapled anastomosis a highly feasible procedure, the curative potential of which, however, can be established only by long-term follow-up studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Slanetz CA Jr, Herter FP, Grinnell RS. Anterior resection versus abdomino-perineal resection for cancer of the rectum and rectosigmoid (an analysis of 524 cases). Am J Surg 1972;123:110–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whittaker M, Goligher JC. The prognosis after surgical treatment for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1976;63:384–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lockhart-Mummery HE, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. The results of surgical treatment for carcinoma of the rectum at St Mark's Hosptial from 1948 to 1972. Br J Surg 1976;63:673–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel SC, Tovee EB, Langer P. Twenty-five years of experience with radical surgical treatment of carcinoma of the extraperitoneal rectum. Surgery 1977;82:460–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Strauss RJ, Friedman M, Platt N, Wise L. Surgical treatment of rectal carcinoma: results of anterior resection vs. abdominoperineal resection at a community hospital. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:269–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Wadsworth J, Parks AG. Total excision or restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Br J Surg 1979;66:625–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Akwari OE, Kelly KA. Anterior resection for adenocarcinoma of the distal large bowel. Am J Surg 1980;139:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapuis PH, Pheils MT, Newland RC, et al. Carcinoma of rectum: results following surgical resection 1971–1979. Aust NZ J Surg 1982;52:16–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elliot MS, Todd IP, Nicholls RJ. Radical restorative surgery for poorly differentiated carcinoma of the mid-rectum. Br J Surg 1982;69:273–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heberer G, Denecke H, Pratschke E, Teichmann R. Anterior and low anterior resection. World J Surg 1982;6:517–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones PF, Thomson HJ. Long term results of a consistent policy of sphincter preservation in the treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1982;69:564–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McDermott F, Hughes E, Pihl E, Milne BJ, Price A. Long term results of restorative resection and total excision for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;154:833–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pheils MT, Chapuis PH, Newland RC, Colquhoun K. Local recurrence following curative resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:98–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Goligher JC, Lee PWR, Macfie J, Simpkins KC, Lintott DJ. Experience with the Russian model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979;148:517–24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nance FC. New techniques of gastrointestinal anastomoses with the EEA stapler. Ann Surg 1979;189:587–600.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ravitch MM, Steichen FM. A stapling instrument for end-to-end inverting anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg 1979;189:791–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fraser I. An historical perspective on mechanical aids in intestinal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155:566–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mettlin C, Mittelman A, Natarajan N, Murphy GP, Schmitz RL, Smart CR. Trends in the United States for the management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:701–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Jones CW, Leach M. A comparison of stapled and sutured anastomoses in colonic operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155:489–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson S-Å, Oscarson J, Petersson B-G. Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument: a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:87–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weakley FL. Cancer of the rectum: a review of surgical options. Surg Clin North Am 1983;63:129–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Localio SA, Eng K. Sphincter-saving operations for cancer of the rectum. N Engl J Med 1979;300:1028–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Goligher JC. Recent trends in the practice of sphincter-saving excision for rectal cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1979;61:169–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Goligher JC. Use of circular stapling gun with peranal insertion of anorectal purse-string suture for construction of very low colorectal or colo-anal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1979;66:501–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Goligher JC. Modern trends in sphincter-saving operations for carcinoma of the rectum. In: Najarian JS, Delaney JP, eds. Gastrointestinal surgery. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1979:577–586.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goligher JC. Current trends in the use of sphincter-saving excision in the treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. Cancer 1982;50:2627–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Christiansen J. Excision of mid-rectal lesions by the Kraske sacral approach. Br J Surg 1980;67:651–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Westbrook KC, Lang NP, Broadwater JR, Thompson BW. Posterior surgical approaches to the rectum. Ann Surg 1982; 195:677–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Beart RW Jr. A clinical comparison of handsewn vs stapled anastomoses (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:234–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA Stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1981; 141:143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Beart RW Jr, Wolff BG. The use of staplers for anterior anastomoses. World J Surg 1982;6:525–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MRB. Assessing the problem, preparing the patient, and minimizing the risks in rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 1982;6:510–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Waxman BP. Large bowel anastomoses: II. The circular staplers. Br J Surg 1983;70:64–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Cass AW, Million RR, Pfaff WW. Patterns of recurrence following surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1976;37:2861–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Olson RM, Perencevich NP, Malcolm AW, Chaffey JT, Wilson RE. Patterns of recurrence following curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1980;45:2969–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Malcolm AW, Perencevich NP, Olson RM, Hanley JA, Chaffey JT, Wilson RE. Analysis of recurrence patterns following curative resection for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:131–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Anderson JM. Recurrent cancer after restorative resection of the rectum. Br Med J 1982;284:531–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Anderberg B, Enblad P, Sjödahl R, Wetterfors J. The EEA-stapling device in anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Acta Chir Scand 1983;149:99–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Anderberg B, Enblad P, Sjödahl R, Wetterfors J. The EEA-stapler in anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum (in Swedish). Läkartidningen 1983;80:1338–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hurst PA, Prout WG, Kelly JM, Bannister JJ, Walker RT. Local recurrence after low anterior resection using the staple gun. Br J Surg 1982;69:275–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 1982;69:613–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sugarbaker PH, Corlew S. Influence of surgical techniques on survival in patients with colorectal cancer: a review. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982;25:545–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Portin BA. Determinants for sphincter preservation in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:16–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnson D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival. Br J Surg 1983;70:150–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bubrick MP. Effect of technique on anastomotic dehiscence (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:232–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ravitch MM, Brolin R, Kolter J, Yap S. Studies in the healing of intestinal anastomoses. World J Surg 1981;5:627–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ward MWN, Danzi M, Lewin MR, Rennie MJ, Clark CG. The effects of subclinical malnutrition and refeeding on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Br J Surg 1982;69:308–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Shikata J, Shida T, Satoh S, Furuya K, Kamiyama A. The effect of local blood flow on the healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;154:657–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gillespie IE. Intestinal anastomosis. Br Med J 1983;206:1002.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Khoury GA, Waxman BP. Large bowel anastomoses: I. The healing process and sutured anastomoses: a review. Br J Surg 1983;70:61–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Smith SRG, Connolly JC, Gilmore OJA. The effect of faecal loading on colonic anastomotic healing. Br J Surg 1983;70:49–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Goligher JC, Graham NG, de Dombal FT. Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 1970;57:109–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Adloff M, Arnaud J-P, Beehary S. Stapled vs sutured colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1980;115:1436–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bubrick MP, Lundeen JW, Hitchcock CR. A comparative radiographic study of low anterior colon anastomoses in dogs. Surgery 1981;89:454–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Polglase AL, Hughes ESR, McDermott FT, Pihl E, Burke FR. A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:792–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Keane FB, Moore DJ, Byrne PJ, Hennessy TP. A comparison of circular stapling devices for rectal anastomoses: a study in dogs. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:285–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Vezeridis M, Evans JT, Mittelman A, Ledesma EJ. EEA stapler in low anterior anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:364–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Smith LE. Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24::236–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kirkegaard P, Christiansen J, Lauritzen B, Henrichsen S, Jörgensen M. Primary results after resection and anastomosis for mid-rectal cancer with a new stapling instrument. Acta Chir Scand 1979;145:321–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kirkegaard P, Christiansen J, Hjortrup A. Anterior resection for mid-rectal cancer with the EEA stapling instrument. Am J Surg 1980;140:312–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Heald RJ. Towards fewer colostomies: the impact of circular stapling devices on the surgery of rectal cancer in a district hospital. Br J Surg 1980;67:198–200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Schaeffer CJ, Giordano JM. Complications associated with EEA stapler in performance of low anterior resections. Am Surg 1981;47:426–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Marti M-C, Fiala J-M, Rohner A. EEA stapler in large bowel surgery. World J Surg 1981;5:735–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Graham HK, Johnston GW, McKelvey STD, Kennedy TL. Five years' experience in stapling the oesophagus and rectum. Br J Surg 1981;68:697–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Fasth S, Hedlund H, Svaninger G, Hulten L. Autosuture of low colorectal anastomosis. Acta Chir Scand 1982;148:535–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Friis J, Hjortrup A, Nielsen OV. Sphincter-saving resection of the rectum using the EEA autostapler. Acta Chir Scand 1982;148:379–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Pemberton LB, Murphy JP, Snider WR. Early postoperative results with EEA stapler. Surgery 1982;92:69–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Leff EI, Hoexter B, Labow SB, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP. The EEA stapler in low colorectal anastomoses: initial experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:704–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Blamey SL, Lee PWR. A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1982;69:19–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Laitinen S, Huttunen R, Ståhlberg M, Mokka R, Kairaluoma M, Larmi TKI. Experiences with the EEA stapling instrument for colorectal anastomosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1980;69:102–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Shahinian TK, Bowen JR, Dorman BA, Soderberg CH Jr, Thompson WR. Experience with the EEA stapling device. Am J Surg 1980;139:549–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Bolton RA, Britton DC. Restorative surgery of the rectum with a circumferential stapler. Lancet 1980;1:850–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Cutait DE, Cutait R, da Silva JH, et al. Stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:155–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Cade D, Gallagher P, Schofield PF, Turner L. Complications of anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling device. Br J Surg 1981;68:339–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Detry RJ, Kestens PJ. Colorectal anastomoses with the EEA stapler. World J Surg 1981;5:739–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Kennedy HL, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM, et al. Colocolostomy and coloproctostomy utilizing the circular intraluminal stapling devices. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:145–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Ling L, Broome A, Rydén S. Low anterior resection using stapling instrument. Acta Chir Scand 1979;145:487–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Kirwan WO. Integrity of low colorectal EEA-stapled anastomosis. Br J Surg 1981;68:539–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Samhouri F, Grodsinsky C. The morbidity and mortality of colostomy closure. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:312–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Forrester DW, Spence VA, Walker WF. Colonic mucosal-submucosal blood flow and the incidence of faecal fistula formation following colostomy closure. Br J Surg 1981;68:541–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Freund HR, Raniel J, Muggia-Sulam M. Factors affecting the morbidity of colostomy closure: a retrospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:712–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Winkler MJ, Volpe PA. Loop transverse colostomy: the case against. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:321–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Bozzetti F, Nava M, Bufalino R, et al. Early local complications following colostomy closure in cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:25–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Gingold BS, Jagelman DG. Value of pelvic suction-irrigation in reducing morbidity of low anterior resection of the rectum: a ten-year experience. Surgery 1982;91:394–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Oka H, Harrison RC, Burhenne HJ. Effect of a biologic glue on the leakage rate of experimental rectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1982;143:561–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Öhman U. Colorectal carcinoma: trends and results over a 30-year period. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:431–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Morgenstern L. The intestinal anastomosis with the end-to-end stapling instrument. Arch Surg 1981;116:141–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Buchmann P, Uhlschmid G. Technical hints for the use of the EEA stapler. Br J Surg 1981;68:338.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Fielding JWL, Gourevitch A, Lee JR, Keighley MRB. Late disruption of initially satisfactory stapled anastomoses. Br Med J 1980;1:1418–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Heald RJ, Leicester RJ. The low stapled anastomosis. Br J Surg 1981;68:333–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Heald RJ, Leicester RJ. The low stapled anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:437–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Moseson MD, Hoexter B, Labow SB. Glucagon: a useful adjunct in anastomosis with a stapling device. Dis Colon Rectum 190;23:25.

  93. Minichan DP Jr. Enlarging the bowel lumen for the EEA stapler. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Adloff M, Arnaud JP, Beeharry S, Turbelin JM. Side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection with the EEA stapler. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:456–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Ragins H, DeLuca FR. Technique for using the EEA stapler for low anterior resection of the rectum entirely from the abdominal approach. Am J Surg 1981;142:388–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Williams NS, Johnston D. The quality of life after rectal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1983;70:460–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. pollett WG, Nicholls RJ. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1983;198:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Karolinska Hospital, S-104 01, Stockholm, Sweden

    Ulf Öhman M.D. & Torgny Svenberg M.D.

Authors
  1. Ulf Öhman M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Torgny Svenberg M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Öhman, U., Svenberg, T. EEA stapler for mid-rectum carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 26, 775–784 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554747

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554747

Key words

Search

Navigation