Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Speaking truth to power: Empowerment ideology as social intervention and policy

  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Humpty Dumpty: “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean neither more nor less.”

King of Hearts: “If there's no meaning in it, that saves a world of trouble, you know, as we needn't try to find any.”—Lewis Carroll

Abstract

The popularity, and subsequent ambiguity, in the use of the term “empowerment” has created an even greater need for reassessment in the applied context than in the theory and research literatures. This paper outlines some of the areas of community, organizational, and societal level social intervention and policy ostensibly based on the concept of empowerment. These include neighborhood voluntary associations (for environmental protection, community crime prevention, etc.), self-help groups, competence-building primary prevention, organizational management, health care and educational reforms, and national and international community service and community development policies. Issues in applying social research to community organizations and to legislative and administrative policy making are reviewed. Ten recommendations are offered, including the value of a dialectical analysis, for helping researchers and policy makers/administrators make more effective use of empowerment theory and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, D. G., Endres, J., Linzer, J., Lorig, K., Howard-Pitney, B., & Rogers, T. (1991). Obstacles to and future goals of ten comprehensive community health promotion projects.Journal of Community Health, 16, 299–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.),Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1–40). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balcazar, F. E., Seekins, T., Fawcett, S. B., & Hopkins, B. L. (1990). Empowering people with physical disabilities through advocacy skills training.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 281–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, M. (1990). Methodological issues in the evaluation of international community participation projects.Sociological Practice, 8, 208–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Neuhaus, R. J. (1977).To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. (Ed.). (1980).The utilization of the social sciences in policy making in the United States. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, B. (1990). Who is being empowered?Community Psychologist, 23(3), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. A., & Keys, C. B. (1993). Empowerment, diversity, and collaboration: Promoting synergy on community boards.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookman, A., & Morgan, S. (Eds.). (1988).Women and the politics of empowerment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., & Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.),Place attachment (pp. 279–304). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B., & Mohai, P. (1992).Race and the incidence of environmental hazards. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, G. (1992).The frontiers of Catholicism: The politics of ideology in a liberal world. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N. (1977). A minimal set of conditions necessary for the utilization of social science knowledge in policy formulation at the national level. In C. Weiss (Ed.),Using social research for public policy making (pp. 183–197). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavis, D. M., Stucky, P. E., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Returning basic research to the community: A relationship between scientist and citizen.American Psychologist, 38, 424–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, A. (1990). Resident participation issues through the prism of Israel's Project Renewal. In N. Carmon (Ed.)Neighborhood policy and programmes: Past and present (pp. 164–178). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1972).Policy research in the social sciences. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice.Academy of Management Review, 13, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G., Mayo, M., & Taylor, M. (1990). Editorial introduction: Empowerment: A continuing role for community development.Community Development Journal, 25, 286–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention.Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 18–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L. A. (Ed.). (1987). Policies to prevent crime: Neighborhood, family, and employment strategies [Special issue].Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 494.

  • Edelstein, M. R. (1988).Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, M. J., Gara, M., Ubriaco, M., Rothbaum, P. A., Clabby, J. F., & Schuyler, T. (1986). Impact of a preventive social problem solving intervention on children's coping with middle-school stressors.American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 259–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F., & Emery, M. (1976). Participative design: Work and community life. In F. Emery & E. Thorsrud,Democracy at work: Report of the Norwegian industrial democracy program. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Schultz, J. A., Richter, K. P., Lewis, P. K., Williams, E. L., Harris, K. I., Berkeley, J. Y., Fisher, J. L., & Lopez, C. M. (1995). Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 677–697.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Florin, P., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1990). Special section: Citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: Insights for empowerment through research.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 41–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. (1993).The kindness of strangers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970).Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, F., & Brown, L. D. (1974). Organization development.Annual Review of Psychology, 25, 313–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1992).Empowerment: The politics of alternative development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, D. (1994, August 26). Unclear limits of Palestinian power.The Jerusalem Post, p. 2B.

  • Gruber, J., & Trickett, E. J. (1987). Can we empower others? The paradox of empowerment in an alternative public high school.American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, G. (1973).A theology of liberation. Maryknoll: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, R. (1987). Participatory design and environmental justice.Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 4, 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A., & Bender, E. I. (1985). Self-help groups as a crucible for people empowerment in the context of social development.Social Development Issues, 9 (2, Fall), 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective.Prevention in Human Services, 3(2/3), 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr (1977). Policymakers' use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? In C. Weiss (Ed.),Using social research for public policy making. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeker, C. J. (1993).Empowerment programs for the severely disadvantaged: Lessons from a process evaluation of a Nicaraguan agricultural cooperative. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., Turner, C., & Alvarado, R. (1991). A community change model for school health promotion.Journal of Health Education, 22(2), 94–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt, J., & Saegert, S. (1990).From abandonment to hope: Community-households in Harlem. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M., & Perkins, D. V. (1987).Principles of community psychology: Perspectives and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, O. H., Britton, P., James, T., Jackson, A., Hobfoll, S. E., & Lavin, J. (1993). The empowerment of women: A key to HIV prevention.Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 320–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, L. H. (1976). Self help groups: Types and psychological processes.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 310–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linney, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (1991).Prevention Plus III: Assessing alcohol and other drug prevention programs at the school and community level. Rockville, MD: U.S. Office of Substance Abuse Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, D. A., Rappaport, J., & Seidman, E. (1991). Setting phenotypes in a mutual help organization: Expanding behavior setting theory.American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 147–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (1988). Social support, organizational characteristics, psychological well-being, and group appraisal in three self-help group populations.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 53–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., & Rappaport, J. (1984). Empowerment in a religious setting: A multivariate investigation.Prevention in Human Services, 3(2/3), 37–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., & Salem, D. A. (1995). Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 631–655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, B., Florin, P., Stevenson, J., Rerman, B., & Mitchell, R. E. (1995). Empowerment praxis in community coalitions.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 699–727.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, M. J., Waugh, N., & Espeland, W. (1984). The Eort McDowell Yavapai: From pawns to powerbrokers.Prevention in Human Services, 3(2/3), 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D. (1988). The use of social science in public interest litigation.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 465–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., Brown, B. B., & Taylor, R. B. (1995).The ecology of empowerment: Predicting participation in community organizations. Unpublished, Univ. of Utah, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 83–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., & Wandersman, A. (1990). “You'll have to work to overcome our suspicions:” Benefits and pitfalls of research with community organizations.Social Policy, 21(1), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 569–579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podolefsky, A. (1983).Case Studies in community crime prevention. Springfield, IL. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention.American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue.Prevention in Human Services, 3(2/3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J., Reischl, T. M., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1991). Mutual help mechanisms in the empowerment of former mental patients. In D. Saleebey (Ed.),The strengths perspective in social work practice: Power in the people (pp. 84–97). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., & Schon, D. A. (1977) Problem setting in policy research. In C. Weiss (Ed.),Using social research for public policy making (235–251). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, R. C., Edelstein, M., Hallman, W. K., Wandersman, A. H. (1995). Citizen participation and empowerment: The case of local environmental hazards.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 657–676.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riessman, F., & Bay, T. (1992). The politics of self-help.Social Policy, 23(2), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (1984). Vehicles for empowerment: The case of feminist movement organizations.Prevention in Human Services, 3, 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riger, S. (1993). What's wrong with empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 279–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. N. (1993). Early education as community intervention: Assisting an ethnic minority to be ready for school.American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 521–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, D. P. (1988). Community Crime Prevention: A review and synthesis of the literature.Justice Quarterly, 5, 323–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1978). An unsuccessful war on poverty?American Psychologist, 33, 831–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seekins, T., & Fawcett, S. B. (1986). Public policymaking and research information.Behavior Analyst, 9, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seekins, T., Maynard-Moody, S., & Fawcett, S. B. (1987). Understanding the policy process: Preventing and coping with community problems. In L. A. Jason, R. D. Felner, R. Hess, & J. N. Moritsugu, (Eds.),Communities: Contributions from allied disciplines (pp. 65–89). New York: Haworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Garcia, I. (1984). The illusion of empowerment: community development within a colonial context.Prevention in Human Services, 3(2/3), 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano-Garcia, I. (1994). The ethics of the powerful and the power of ethics.American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, B. (1976).Black empowerment: Social work in oppressed communities. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P. W., & Hughey, J. (1995). Community organizing: An ecological route to empowerment and power.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 729–748.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). An empirical test of a comprehensive model of intrapersonal empowerment in the workplace.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 601–629.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. (1990). Critical issues in community participation in self-help housing programmes: The experience of FUNDASAL.Community Development Journal, 25, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B., & Perkins, D. D. (1995).The impact of block-level fear of crime and citizen participation on anxiety and depression: A stress and coping framework. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University.

  • Toch, H., & Grant, J. D. (1982).Reforming human services: Change through participation, Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolan, P., Keys, C., Chertok, F., & Jason L. (Eds.). (1990).Researching community psychology: Issues of theory and methods. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaines, E. (1993). An empowerment orientation for home economics.Home Economics Forum, 6(2), 21–25, 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vindhya, U., & Kalpana, V. (1989). Voluntary Organizations and Women's Struggle for Change: Experience with BCT.Indian Journal of Social Work, 50, 183–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems.American Psychologist, 39, 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. (1977) Introduction. In C. Weiss (Ed.),Using social research for public policy making. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. B. (Ed.). (1988).Empowerment through difference: Multicultural awareness in education. Peoria, IL: Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, T. (1987). Community psychology and empowerment: An activist's insights.American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeich, S., & Levine, R. (1994). Political efficacy: Enhancing the construct and its relationship to mobilization of people.Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 259–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E., & Muenchow, S. (1992).Head Start: The inside story of America's most successful educational experiment. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1989). The relationship between political efficacy and citizen participation: Construct validation studies.Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 554–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment.Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 581–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725–750.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. A., Reischl, T. M., Seidman, E., Rappaport, J., Toro, P. A., & Salem, D. A. (1991). Expansion strategies of a mutual help organization.American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 251–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zola, I. K. (1987). The politicization of the self-help movement.Social Policy, 18(2), 32–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environment and Behavior Area, FCS Department/AEB, University of Utah, 84112, Salt Lake City, Utah

    Douglas D. Perkins

Authors
  1. Douglas D. Perkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Portions of this paper were first presented in the program “Empowerment Theory, Research and policy” at the Biennial Conference on Community Research and Action, Williamsburg, Virginia, June 18, 1993. The author thanks Barbara B. Brown, Jo Ann Lippe, Ken Maton and his students, David V. Perkins, Marc A. Zimmerman, and the anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perkins, D.D. Speaking truth to power: Empowerment ideology as social intervention and policy. Am J Commun Psychol 23, 765–794 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506991

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506991

Key words

Search

Navigation