Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling in aerobiology. Differences between traverses along the length of the slide in Hirst sporetraps

  • Published:
Aerobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two years of data from four longitudinal traverses along each day's slide prepared from a continuously running Burkard sporetrap have been analyzed statistically. Using the Friedman test, a statistically significant difference was found between the four traverses, with a greater than 7% loss of pollen grains in the two outer traverses in relation to the inner. Four slides were then selected for more detailed analysis, using 18 longitudinal traverses with a 1-mm separation from the upper to the lower edge of the Melinex tape. There was found to be a progressive decline from the centre to the outside, and more than 4% of pollen grains were found outside the typical 14 mm width of the impaction orifice. There was no correlation between pollen grain size and the decline in counts from the centre to the outside. For the complete data set, there was a general rise in the diversity of bollen types with increasing sample counts, but above about 1000 pollen grains per sample there were no more than 27 pollen types found, often even fewer. A discussion is presented of whether four traverses really should be a fixing sample size, or whether it might be better to fix the total pollen count beginning with a traverse in the middle of the slide and ending with a variable number of traverses when that count is reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhat, M.M. and Rajasab, A.H. (1989) Efficiency of vertical cylinder spore trap and seven day volumetric Burkard spore trap in monitoring airborne pollen and fungal spores. Grana 28, 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, E. (1994) Analytical Methods. Advanced Aerobiology Course, Córdoba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, E. (1995). La Red Española de Aerobiología. Rea 1, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galan, C., Alcazar, P., Domínguez, E., Villamandos, F. and García-Pantaleón, F. (1995) Airborne pollen grain concentrations at two different heights. Aerobiologia 11, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, J.M. (1952) An automatic volumetric spore trap. Ann. Appl. Biol. 39(2), 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Käpylä, M. (1989) Adhesives and mounting media in aerobiological sampling. Grana 28, 215–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Käpylä, M. and Penttinen (1981) An evaluation of the microscopical counting methods of the tape in Hirst-Burkard pollen and spore trap. Grana 20, 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandrioli, P. (1994) Sampling Techniques. Advanced Aerobiology Course, Córdoba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, E.C., Raynor, G.S., Hayes, J.V., Lewis, D.M. and Haines, J.H. (1974) Manual for Sampling Airborne Pollen. Haffner Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, B.V. and Moseholm, L. (1993) Precision of the daily pollen count. Identifying sources of variation using variance component models. Aerobiologia 9, 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rantio-Lehtimäki, A., Linnea Helander, M. and Pessi, A.-M. (1991a) Circadian periodicity of airborne pollen and spores; significance of sampling height. Aerobiologia 7, 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rantio-Lehtimäki, A., Koivikko, A., Kupias, R., Mäkinen, Y. and Pohjola, A. (1991b) Significance of sampling height of airborne particles for aerobiological information. Allergy 46, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molina, R.T., Rodríguez, A.M. & Palacios, I.S. Sampling in aerobiology. Differences between traverses along the length of the slide in Hirst sporetraps. Aerobiologia 12, 161–166 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447407

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447407

Keywords

Navigation