Skip to main content
Log in

A user's guide for avoiding errors in absorbance image cytometry: a review with original experimental observations

  • Review
  • Published:
The Histochemical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The sources of errors which may occur when cytophotometric analysis is performed with video microscopy using a charged-coupled device (CCD) camera and image analysis are reviewed. The importance of these errors in practice has been tested, and ways of minimizing or avoiding them are described. Many of these sources of error are known from scanning and integrating cytophotometry; they include the use of white instead of monochromatic light, the distribution error, glare, diffraction, shading distortion, and inadequate depth of field. Sources of errors specifically linked with video microscopy or image analysis are highlighted as well; these errors include blooming, limited dynamic range of grey levels, non-linear responses of the camera, contrast transfer, photon noise, dark current, read-out noise, fixed scene noise and spatial calibration. Glare, contrast transfer, fixed scene noise, depth of field and spatial calibration seem to be the most serious sources of errors when measurements are not carried out correctly. We include a table summarizing all the errors discussed in this review and procedures for avoiding them. It can be concluded that if accurate calibration steps are performed and proper guidelines followed, image cytometry can be applied safely for quantifying amounts of chromophore per cell or per unit volume of tissue in sections, even when relatively simple and inexpensive instrumentation is being used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikens,R. S. (1990) CCD cameras for video microscopy. InOptical Microscopy for Biology (edited byHerman,B. &Jacobson,K.) pp. 207–18. New York: Wiley-Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikens,R. S.,Agard,D. A. &Sedat,J. W. (1989) Solid-state imagers for microscopy.Meth. Cell. Biol. 29, 291–313.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allison,D. C.,Ridolpho,P. F.,Rasch,E. M.,Rasch,R. W. &Johnson,T. S. (1981) Increased accuracy of absorption cytophotometric DNA values by control of stain intensity.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 29, 1219–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allison,D. C.,Lawrence,G. N.,Ridolpho,P. F.,O'Grady,B. J.,Rasch,R. W. &Rasch,E. M. (1984) Increased accuracy and speed of absorption cytometric DNA measurements by automatic corrections for nuclear darkness.Cytometry 5, 217–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Araki,T.,Chikamori,K.,Sasaki,K.,Kawata,S.,Minami,S. &Yamada,M. (1987) Topographic estimations by component spectroanalysis of two formazans of nitrobluetetrazolium in tissue sections.Histochemistry 86, 567–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baak,J. P. A.,Oort,J.,Fleege,J. C.,VanDiest,P. J. &Ploem,J. S. (1991) Techniques in quantitative pathology. InManual of Quantitative Pathology in Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis (edited byBaak,J. F. A., pp. 45–56. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacus,J. W. &Grace,L. J. (1987) Optical microscope system for standardized cell measurement and analysis.Appl. Opt. 26, 3280–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barba,J.,Chan,K. S. &Gil,J. (1992) Quantitative perimeter and area measurement of digital images.Micr. Res. Techn. 21, 300–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels,P. H. (1991) Videophotometry: sources of error. InManual of Quantitative Pathology in Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis (edited byBaak,J. F. A.) pp. 182–8. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitensky,L.,Butcher,R. G. &Chayen,J. (1973) Quantitative cytochemistry in the study of lysosomal function. InLysosomes in Biology and Pathology (edited byDingle,J. T.) pp. 465–510. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boguth,W. &Piller,H. (1988) The influence of the aperture of illumination on the accuracy of microscope-photometric measurements of internal transmittance.J. Microsc. 149, 117–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookman,R. J. &Horrigan,F. T. (1993) Sampling characteristics of CCD video cameras. InOptical Microscopy: Emerging Methods and Applications (edited byHerman,B. &Lemasters,B. H.) pp. 115–131. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castleman,K. R. (1987) Spatial and photometric resolution and calibration requirements for cell image analysis instruments.Appl. Opt. 26, 3338–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castleman,K. R. (1993) Resolution and sampling requirements for digital image processing, analysis and display. InElectronic Light Microscopy (edited byShotton,D.) pp. 71–93. New York: Wiley-Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCIR (1990)Recommendation 601-2Encoding parameters of digital television for studios.

  • Chieco,P. &Boor,P. (1984) Quantitative histochemistry in pathology and toxicology. An evaluation of the original two-wavelength method of Ornstein.Lab. Invest. 50, 355–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chieco,P. &Robutti,F. (1992)Metodi in Citologia Analitica. 1. Citofotometria del DNA e Analisi in situ dell' Attività Proliferativa nei Tumori Solidi (edited by Italian league against tumour). Bologna: Eurocopy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chieco,P.,Melchiorri,C.,Lisignoli,G.,Marabini,A. &Orlandi,C. (1991) A multifaced DNA ploidy analysis to determine ovarian carcinoma aggressiveness.Cancer 67, 1878–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole,M. (1971) Instrument errors in quantitative image analysis.Microscope 19, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson,A. E.,Norton,J. A. &Weinberg,D. S. (1990) Comparative assessment of proliferation and DNA content in breast carcinoma by image analysis and flow cytometry.Am. J. Pathol. 136, 1115–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan,R. M. &Goldstein,E. (1985) A charge coupled device-based image cytophotometry system for quantitative histochemistry and cytochemistry.J. Histochem. Cyto-chem. 33, 551–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duijndam,W. A. L.,Smeulders,A. W. M.,VanDuijn,P. &Verweij,A. C. (1980a) Optical errors in scanning stage absorbance cytophotometry. I. Procedures for correcting apparent integrated absorbance values for distributional, glare, and diffraction errors.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 28, 395–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duijndam,W. A. L.,VanDuijn,P. &Riddersma,S. H. (1980b) Optical errors in scanning stage absorbance cytophotometry. II. Application of correction factors for residual distributional error, glare and diffraction error in practical cytophotometry.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 28, 395–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fand,S. B. &Spencer,R. P. (1964) Off-peak absorption measurements in Feulgen cytophotometry.J. Cell. Biol. 22, 515–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein,D. J. (1970) Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. I. Stray light (glare).J. Microsc. 92, 1–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein,D. J. (1971) Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. II. Spot size, focus and resolution.J. Microsc. 93, 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein,D. J. (1975) Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. III. The monochromator system.J. Microsc. 105, 33–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein,D. J. (1981) Errors in microdensitometry.Histochem. J. 13, 251–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein,D. J. (1982) Scanning microdensitometry of objects small relative to the wavelength of light.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 30, 1040–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez,R. C. &Wintz,P. (1986)Digital Image Processing, 2nd edn. Reading: Addison Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiraoka,Y.,Sedat,J. W. &Agard,D. A. (1987) The use of a charged-coupled device for quantitative optical microscopy of biological structures.Science 238, 36–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Inoué,S. (1986)Video Microscopy. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James,J. &Tanke,H. J. (1991)Biomedical Light Microscopy. Dordrecht: Kluver Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis,L. R. (1981) Microdensitometry with image analyser video scanners.J. Microsc. 121, 337–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins,T. (1992) Is that a camera on your tie clip? The new-generation mini CCDs.Adv. Imaging. 7/9, 22–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan,S. W.,Brayer,J. M.,Bartells,P. H. &Anderson,R. E. (1988) Video-based image collection for quantitative histopathology.Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 10, 37–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kristian,J. &Blouke,M. (1982) Charge-coupled devices in astronomy.Scientific American 247, 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middelhoek,S. &Audet,S. A. (1989)Silicon Sensors, pp. 35–103. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein,L. (1952) The distributional error in microspectrophotometry.Lab. Invest. 1, 250–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Philips (1991)Video Data Handbook. Sunnyvale: Signetics Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller,H. (1977)Microscope Photometry. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pluta,M. (1988)Advanced Light Microscopy, Vol. 1.Principles and Basic Properties. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramm,P.,Kulick,J. H.,Stryker,M. P. &Frost,B. J. (1984) Video and scanning microdensitometer-based imaging systems in autoradiographic densitometry.J. Neurosci. Meth. 11, 89–100.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez,L.,Regh,M.,Biesterfeld,S.,Chatelain,R. &Böcking,A. (1990) Performance of a TV image analysis system as a microdensitometer.Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 12, 279–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz,M. L.,Lipkin,L. E.,Wade,M. J.,Lemkin,P. F. &Carman,G. M. (1974) High resolution shading correction.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 22, 751–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smeulders,A. W. M. &TenKate,T. K. (1987) Accuracy of optical density measurement of cells. 1: Low resolution.Appl. Opt. 26, 3249–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay,T. T.,Inman,R.,Wray,B.,Herman,B. &Jacobson,K. (1990) Characterization of low-level cameras for digitized video microscopy.J. Microsc. 160, 141–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanNoorden,C. J. F. (1989) Principles of cytophotometry in enzyme histochemistry and validity of the reactions.Acta Histochem. Suppl. 37, 21–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanNoorden,C. J. F. &Butcher,R. G. (1986) The out-of-range error in microdensitometry.Histochem. J. 18, 397–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanNoorden,C. J. F. &Butcher,R. G. (1991) Quantitative enzyme histochemistry. InHistochemistry. Theoretical and Applied (edited byStoward,P. J. &Pearse,A. G. E.) pp. 355–432. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter,R. J. &Berns,M. W. (1986) Digital image processing and analysis. InVideo Microscopy (edited by)InoueS.) pp. 327–92. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young,I. T. (1988) Sampling density and quantitative microscopy.Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 10, 269–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer,H. G. (1973) Microphotometry. InMicromethods in Molecular Biology (edited byNeuhoff,V.) pp. 297–328. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chieco, P., Jonker, A., Melchiorri, C. et al. A user's guide for avoiding errors in absorbance image cytometry: a review with original experimental observations. Histochem J 26, 1–19 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02388388

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02388388

Keywords

Navigation