Skip to main content

Beyond Brightfield: “Forgotten” Microscopic Modalities

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Neurohistology and Imaging Techniques

Part of the book series: Neuromethods ((NM,volume 153))

  • 971 Accesses

Abstract

“Forgotten” microscopic modalities, devices, and accessories derived from or complementary to brightfield microscopy are briefly surveyed. These include off­axis illumination, schlieren contrast, Abbe diffraction apparatus, Rheinberg illumination, darkfield and phase-contrast microscopy combined, incident-illumination microscopy, camera lucida, and comparison microscopy. Examples of their use are shown. While most of them are no longer or only rarely available or used, they are still important for proper understanding of image formation, contrast generation, and data interpretation in microscopy. In some cases, they are superior to their more modern counterparts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 24 September 2021

    The online version of this book had multiple errors as specified below:

Notes

  1. 1.

    16th International Microscopy Congress (IMC16), Sapporo, Japan (3-8 Sept 2006)

  2. 2.

    Relief contrast after Hostounský. Dr. Zdeněk Hostounský (1925-2013) was a protozoologist and insect pathologist at Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences in Prague, and a founding member of The Stentor Institute.

  3. 3.

    The Beautiful Brain (Abrams Books 2017, ISBN: 9781419722271)

  4. 4.

    CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000729

  5. 5.

    Available, for example, from Diatom Lab (www.diatomshop.com, www.testslides.com)

  6. 6.

    The Bertrand lens is an extra focusable lens that, when inserted into the optical path, works in conjunction with the eyepiece to form a small telescope to give a magnified view of the objective back focal plane.

  7. 7.

    https://www.microscopyu.com/tutorials/kohler

  8. 8.

    https://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/timeline/people/kohler.html

References

  1. Abbe E (1874/1875) A contribution to the theory of the microscope, and the nature of microscopic vision. Proceedings of the Bristol Naturalists’ Society (new series) 1(Pt 2):200–261 (translated and commented on by H. E. Fripp). https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7506100

  2. Abbe E (1873) Beiträge zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung. (Schultze’s) Archiv für Mikroskopische Anatomie (Bonn) 9:413–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02956173. BHL:13290331. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13290331

  3. Sheppard CJR (2017) Resolution and superresolution. Microsc Res Tech 80(6):590–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Köhler A (1893) Ein neues Beleuchtungsverfahren für mikrophotographische Zwecke. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Mikroskopie und für Mikroskopische Technik 10(4):433–440. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/3013561

  5. Köhler A (1894) New method of illumination for photomicrographical purposes. J Roy Microsc Soc (volume not numbered, April issue):261–262. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/49603250

  6. Abbe E (1873) Ueber einen neuen Beleuchtungsapparat am Mikroskop. (Schultze’s) Archiv für Mikroskopische Anatomie (Bonn) 9:469­480. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02956177. BHL:13290387. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/13290387

  7. Abbe E (1875) A new illuminating apparatus for the microscope. Monthly Microscopical J 13:77–82. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14276730

  8. Needham GH (1958) The practical use of the microscope. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL. https://lccn.loc.gov/57010440

  9. Metzner P (1928) Das Mikroskop, 2nd edn. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig/Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wolf J (1944) Mikroskopická technika. Vesmír, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hostounský Z, Pelc R (2006) An efficient way of high-contrast, quasi-3D cellular imaging: off-axis illumination. J Biochem Biophys Meth 68(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2006.03.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hostounský Z, Pelc R (2007) Phase-contrast versus off-axis illumination: is a more complex microscope always more powerful? Adv Physiol Educ 31(2):232–235. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00028.2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Axelrod D (1981) Zero-cost modification of bright field microscopes for imaging phase gradients on cells: Schlieren optics. Cell Biophys 3(2):167–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02788132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Töpler A (1866) Ueber die Methode der Schlierenbeobachtung als mikroskopisches Hülfsmittel, nebst Bemerkungen zur Theorie der schiefen Beleuchtung. (Poggendorf's) Ann Phys Chem 127(4):556–580. [Ann Phys 203(4):556–580]. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18662030405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffman R, Gross L (1975) The modulation contrast microscope. Nature 254:586–588. https://doi.org/10.1038/254586a0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Padawer J (1968) The Nomarski interference-contrast microscope. An experimental basis for image interpretation. J Microsc (Oxf) 88(Pt3):305–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1968.tb00616.x

  17. Bretschneider F, Teunis PFM (1994) Reduced-carrier single-sideband microscopy: a powerful method for the observation of transparent microscopical objects. J Microsc (Oxf) 175(Pt2):121–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1994.tb03475.x

  18. Inoué S, Spring K (1997) Video microscopy: the fundamentals. Plenum Press (Springer), New York. ISBN: 978-0306455315

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy DB, Davidson MW (2012) Fundamentals of light microscopy and electronic imaging, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, New York. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118382905

  20. Bradbury S (1996) The reception of Abbe’s theory in England. Proc Roy Microsc Soc 31(4):293–299. http://www.microscopist.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/The-reception-of-Abbes-Theory-in-England.pdf

  21. Nuttall B (2008) Image formation in the microscope: the Abbe diffraction apparatus. Bull Sci Instr Soc 96:27–29

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fripp HE (1876/1877) On professor Abbe’s experimental demonstration of diffraction spectra in the microscope. Proc Bristol Naturalists’ Soc (new series) 2(Pt 1):24–38. BHL:7545726. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/7545726

  23. Stephenson JW (1877) Observations on professor Abbe’s experiments illustrating his theory of microscopic vision. Monthly Microscopical J 17:82–88. BHL:14157879. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14157879

  24. Michel K (1964) Die Grundzüge der Theorie des Mikroskops in elementarer Darstellung (Physik und Technik), vol 1. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wetzel RA, Needham GH (1928) Some photographs of optical images after Abbe. Washington Meeting of the American Physical Society (Washington, D.C., 20–21 Apr 1928). Phys Rev 31(6):1108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.31.1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zernike F (1955) How I discovered phase contrast. Science 121(3141):345–349. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.121.3141.345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rheinberg J (1896) On an addition to the methods of microscopical research, by a new way of optically producing colour-contrast between an object and its background, or between definite parts of the object itself. J Roy Microsc Soc (volume not numbered, August issue):373–388. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/49597776

  28. Gautier C (2012) Proboscis (“tongue”) of a cricket (Gryllus campestris) under Rheinberg illumination. The Scientist (Image of the Day, 30 Oct 2012) https://www.the-scientist.com/image-of-the-day/image-of-the-day-40285 and Nikon Small World https://www.nikonsmallworld.com/people/christian-gautier

  29. Bünning E (1935) Einige Beobachtungen über die Körnchenströmung in den Staubfadenhaaren von Tradescantia, nebst Bemerkungen über die Verwendbarkeit des Mikropolychromars bei zellphysiologischen Studien. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Mikroskopie und für mikroskopische Technik 52(2):166–172

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shillaber CP (1959) Photomicrography in theory and practice, 5th edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York (Chapman & Hall, London)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Downing SW, Spitzer RH, Salo WL, Downing JS, Saidel LJ, Koch EA (1981) Threads in the hagfish slime gland thread cells: Organization, biochemical features, and length. Science 212(4492):326–328. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.212.4492.326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Downing SW, Spitzer RH, Koch EA, Salo WL (1984) The hagfish slime gland thread cell. I. A unique cellular system for the study of intermediate filaments and intermediate filament-microtubule interactions. J Cell Biol 98(2):653–669. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.98.2.653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Havics AA (2014) Contrast methods in microscopy: Rheinberg illumination. The Microscope 62(4):157–169

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spitta EJ (1907) Microscopy. The construction, theory and use of the microscope. E. P. Dutton & Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gottschewski GHM (1953) Über die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der neuen Leitz-Phasenkontrasteinrichtung nach Heine. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Mikroskopie und für Mikroskopische Technik 61(4):185–200

    Google Scholar 

  36. James P (2003) The Heine condenser (Part 1 and 2). Micscape, issue 95 http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/sep03ind.html and 97 http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/nov03ind.html

  37. Andrecka J, Arroyo JO, Lewis K, Cross RA, Kukura P (2016) Label-free imaging of microtubules with sub-nm precision using interferometric scattering microscopy. Biophys J 110(1):214–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.055

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mahamdeh M, Simmert S, Luchniak A, Schäffer E, Howard J (2018) Label-free high-speed wide-field imaging of single microtubules using interference reflection microscopy. J Microsc 272(1):60–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12744

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rottenfusser R (2013) Proper alignment of the microscope. Meth Cell Biol 114:43–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407761-4.00003-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bradbury S, Evennett PJ, Haselmann H, Piller H (1989) RMS dictionary of light microscopy (RMS Handbook №15). Oxford University Press and Royal Microscopical Society, Oxford. ISBN: 978-0198564218

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sanderson J (2019) Understanding light microscopy. Wiley (RMS series), Hoboken, NJ. ISBN: 978-0470973752

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wessenberg H, Reed MK (1971) The use of oblique illumination in microscopic observations of living protozoa. Trans Am Microsc Soc 90(4):449–457. https://jstor.org/stable/3225459

  43. Michel K (1943) Grundzüge der Mikrophotographie. In: Zeiss Nachrichten, Sonderheft (special issue), vol 4, 2nd edn. Kommissionsverlag Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp 1–192

    Google Scholar 

  44. Amos WB (2000) Lessons from the history of microscopy. Nat Cell Biol 2(8):E151–E152. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Horio T, Hotani H (1986) Visualization of the dynamic instability of individual microtubules by dark-field microscopy. Nature 321(6070):605–607. https://doi.org/10.1038/321605a0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Piper T, Piper J (2012) Variable phase dark-field contrast – a variant illumination technique for improved visualizations of transparent specimens. Microsc Microanal 18(2):343–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927612000153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Piper T, Piper J (2013) Variable phase bright-field contrast – an alternative illumination technique for improved imaging in transparent specimens. Microsc Microanal 19(1):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927612013323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Walker I (2005) Wild M20­EB microscope. Micscape, issue 122 http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/dec05ind.html

  49. López-López R, López-Gallardo M, Pérez-Álvarez MJ, Prada C (2008) Isolation of chick retina cones and study of their diversity based on oil droplet colour and nucleus position. Cell Tiss Res 332(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-007-0572-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Alvarez-Delphin K, Morris AC, Snelson CD, Gamse JT, Gupta T, Marlow FL, Mullins MC, Burgess HA, Granato M, Facool JM (2009) Tbx2b is required for ultraviolet photoreceptor cell specification during zebrafish retinal development. Proc Natnl Acad Sci U S A 106(6):2023–2028. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809439106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to Dr. Petro Khoroshyy (Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague) and Dr. Floris G. Wouterlood (Amsterdam University Medical Centers) for helpful comments, and acknowledges support via Ministry of Education projects: Chiral Microscopy (LTC17012) and ChemBioDrug.Footnote 4

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radek Pelc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1 (Hands-on Demonstration)

Diffraction and Resolution

Inspect a diatom specimenFootnote 5 using an objective fitted with a built-in iris diaphragm (e.g., Nikon ×100/0.50 − 1.30) at different settings (i.e., different effective numerical aperture, NA). In this way, it is possible to artificially reduce the objective’s resolving power to the extent (NA = 0.40 in our example) that the finest details in the diatom image completely disappear (Fig. 3B).

Alternatively, use an ordinary objective (having no iris diaphragm) jointly with a diffraction funnel fitted under the ocular head of an upright microscope. Insert S2 slider (with a built-in iris diaphragm) into the funnel (Figs. 4 and 5).

Inspect the objective back focal plane using a centering (“phase”) telescope or Bertrand lensFootnote 6 to monitor the diffraction maxima of different orders while closing and opening the diaphragm in (or above) the objective lens. Typically, 0th and 1st order maxima will be visible (the former representing direct or undiffracted light).

Note that the diffraction patterns may be clearly observed only with the condenser aperture diaphragm closed as much as possible (down to a “pinhole”).

Illuminate the diatom specimen with light of different wavelengths. Blue light (shorter wavelength, ca. 450 nm) is more likely to resolve fine details than red light, ca. 700 nm) as the resolving power is inversely proportional to NA. For this effect to be sufficiently prominent, the objective (or S2 slider) iris controlling the effective NA needs to be set to an appropriate value (0.80 in the example shown in Fig. 3C, D), as checked by viewing the diffraction patterns in the objective back focal plane.

Be aware that different diatom species feature structures of different periodicities.

Appendix 2 (Exercise)

Setting Köhler Illumination

(minor adaptation of a text originally written by Dr. Lisa Cameron, Light Microscopy Core Facility, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA)

Following is a step-by-step protocol for Köhler illumination with transmitted light. An interactive version is also available at the online Microscopy U(niversity)Footnote 7 and elsewhereFootnote 8. For information on focusing the light source, please see the “Focusing the light source” section further below.

First, open all diaphragms. Raise the condenser to its highest point (on an upright microscope). Put a well-stained specimen on the stage, and inspect it with a low power (10×) objective.

Focus the objective lens to obtain a sharp image of the specimen by using the coarse and fine focus controls. This first step sets the correct relationship between the specimen and objective lens.

On a binocular microscope, each user may need to adjust the eyepieces for their own eyes for optimal focus. At least one eyepiece will have an adjustment collar. Use one eye to look down the microscope and focus on some detail in the specimen while keeping the eye which uses the eyepiece with adjustable collar closed. Then switch and use the other eye. Turn the adjustable eyepiece collar to focus the same detail in the image as sharp as before. This procedure is referred to as diopter adjustment and is recommended every time a microscope is used, for the sake of microscopist’s visual comfort. Setting Köhler illumination is possible without it if using one eye only.

Focus the condenser by first closing the illuminated field diaphragm and then adjust the height of the condenser with the condenser focus knob until a sharp image of the field diaphragm is seen superimposed on the image of the specimen (Fig. 1C). Make sure that the condenser diaphragm is wide open. This adjustment sets the correct relationship between the condenser lens and the specimen. If the microscope has an Abbe condenser, this image will likely have a fringe of color around the field aperture.

Center the condenser lens. To do this, make the image of the field diaphragm concentric with the field of view (Fig. 1D) using the condenser centering screws. This adjustment makes the optical axis of the condenser lens coincide with that of the microscope as defined by the field diaphragm and the objective lens.

Adjust the area of the field that is illuminated. Open the field diaphragm until its image is just outside the field of view; readjust the condenser centering if necessary (as you open it). This ensures that illumination falls only on the area of specimen within the field of view, and that the diameter of the primary image is only a little larger than the field-limiting diaphragm as seen by the eyepiece. This prevents light from falling on the internal walls of the microscope to be scattered to produce hot spots and haze, reducing contrast in the final image.

Adjust the aperture diaphragm (illuminating aperture) in the condenser. To do this, remove the eyepiece, or turn the Bertrand lens into position if available—look down the microscope tube from ca. 100 mm above the tube, and observe the back focal plane of the objective, the disc of light at the base of the tube. More conveniently, use a centering (“phase”) telescope in place of the eyepiece, in the same way as during adjustment of the annular diaphragm for phase-contrast imaging. Close the aperture diaphragm until the image of the iris is approximately 70–80% of the viewing field (the aperture of the objective). Replace the eyepiece (or remove the Bertrand lens). The working (effective) aperture of the condenser is now slightly smaller than the aperture of the objective lens. Do not close the diaphragm too far; this will cause a serious deterioration in the quality of the image.

Adjust the brightness of illumination using the control on the lamp power supply, or by inserting neutral density filter(s). These are usually found along the base of the microscope between the lamp and the field diaphragm. The microscope optical adjustments or diaphragms should not be used to control brightness. This will adversely affect the quality of the image. For instance, if the condenser diaphragm is closed too much, the image will appear too contrasty, as refractile structures will be highlighted too much due to diffraction effects; and with it wide open, there will be glare due to stray light (internal reflections). The resolution is poor in both. In a microscope with absolutely no internal reflections the setting is optimal when the effective numerical aperture of the condenser (adjustable by its diaphragm) matches the NA of objective in use. As such microscopes do not exist in reality the abovementioned setting of ca. 70–80% is recommended. Image contrast is slightly improved yet the diffraction artifacts thus introduced are minimal.

For a higher power objective:

Rotate the nosepiece to the 40× dry objective. Owing to parfocality of objective design, the 40× objective should be almost in focus after aligning the microscope for 10×; it was not the case in very old microscopes.

As before, focus and center the image of the field diaphragm using the condenser focus knob and the condenser centering knobs. The aperture of the field diaphragm will need to be readjusted.

Remove an eyepiece (ideally replace it with the centering [“phase”] telescope), or use the Bertrand lens to observe the back focal plane of the objective. Notice that the area illuminated for the low power objective is much smaller than the diameter of the back aperture of the 40× objective.

Adjust the condenser diaphragm so that the effective NA of the condenser is about the same as the objective NA.

For a high-power oil immersion objective:

Rotate the nosepiece so that a high-power oil immersion objective is near-vertical. Just before it is clicked into place, stop and add oil to the coverslip, as close as possible to the optical axis (light beam coming from condenser prealigned at smaller magnifications, see above). Be sure the oil droplet does not have any bubbles. Use immersion oil provided by the microscope manufacturer, as there are some slight differences. Ideally, the refractive index of the oil, coverslip, and objective lenses should be the same.

Click the oil immersion objective into place. The space between the front lens of the objective and the coverslip should now be filled with oil.

Remove an eyepiece (ideally replace it with the centering [“phase”] telescope) or use the Bertrand lens to view the back aperture of the objective. Open the condenser diaphragm to almost fill the objective aperture.

Replace the eyepiece (or remove the Bertrand lens) and observe the specimen. Adjust the field diaphragm until the edge just matches the field of view. Strictly speaking, the condenser should again be readjusted as above (focus and centering). However, switching from ×40 to ×100 objective will rarely misalign the condenser beyond tolerable limit.

Focusing the light source:

Remove the diffuser from the lamp housing or along the base of the microscope stand, if possible, in order to see bulb and filament. Lamp illumination should fill most of the front aperture of the condenser. Put a sheet of lens paper on the specimen stage to help visualize the area of illumination. Focus light on the lens paper by moving the lamp-focusing knob. Then remove the eyepiece (ideally replace it with the centering [“phase”] telescope) or insert the Bertrand lens to view the back focal plane of the objective. Be sure the lamp filament is centered and focused in the plane of the condenser diaphragm. Adjust the collector lens on the lamp housing.

N.B.: Many student microscopes and more recently released modern research ones do not have illumination bulb adjustments, but are designed to deliver even illumination.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Pelc, R. (2020). Beyond Brightfield: “Forgotten” Microscopic Modalities. In: Pelc, R., Walz, W., Doucette, J.R. (eds) Neurohistology and Imaging Techniques. Neuromethods, vol 153. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0428-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0428-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0426-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0428-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics