Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of natural enemies on brood production inIps typographus (Col. scolytidae) with special reference to egg-laying and predation byThanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae)

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The predatorThanasimus formicarius (L.) (Coleoptera, Cleridae) and its preyIps typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) were studied in the laboratory and the field.

In the laboratory, 11T. formicarius laid 71–132 eggs (mean=162) during 66–123 days. During this time they ate 66–132I. typographus adults per pair (male +female). The number of eggs laid per female was not correlated with life span or the number ofIps eaten.

In the field, predation byT. formicarius larvae and other natural enemies onI. typographus brood was studied in the last year of an outbreak. Caged and uncaged spruce bolts attacked byI. typographus were used, and pairs ofT. formicarius were released in the cages. The treatments were: uncaged bolts, caged bolts withoutT. formicarius, caged bolts with 4T. formicarius pairs, and caged bolts with 8T. formicarius pairs. The productivity ofI. typographus was highest in the caged bolts withoutT. formicarius (mean=4.5 offspring/female) and lowest in the uncaged bolts (mean=0.9 offspring/female). The density ofI. typographus galleries was similar in the different treatments. Hence, the variation in productivity between treatments could not have been due to differences in the levels of intraspecific competition. There was no difference in bark beetle productivity or density ofT. formicarius larvae between bolts with 4 pairs ofT. formicarius and bolts with 8 pairs (mean=2.5 offspring/female). This indicates that some kind of interference occurred betweenT. formicarius individuals (e.g. cannibalism) and that a maximum level of predation was reached. Predation by larvae ofMedetera spp. (Diptera, Dolichopodidae),Thanasimus spp. and other beetles, and parasitism by wasps (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) probably caused the low productivity in the uncaged bolts.

Résumé

Le prédateurThanasimus formicarius et sa proieIps typographus ont été étudiés au laboratoire et en conditions naturelles.

En laboratoire, 11T. formicarius ont pondu entre 71 et 132 œufs (moyenne: 162) en 66 à 123 jours. Pendant ce temps, ils consommaient 66 à 132I. typographus adultes par couple. Le nombre d'œufs pondus par femelle n'était pas corrélé avec la durée de vie ou le nombre d'Ips consommés.

En conditions extérieures, la prédation deT. formicarius et des autres ennemis naturels sur les descendants d'Ips typographus a été étudiée la dernière année d'une pullulation. On a utilisé des rondins d'épicea attaqués parI. typographus et encagés ou non; des couples deT. formicarius étaient lâchés dans les cages. Les traitements étaient les suivants: rondins sans cage, rondins encagés sansT. formicarius ou avec 4 ou 8 couples deT. formicarius. La production d'I. typographus a été la plus grande pour les rondins encagés sansT. formicarius (moyenne 4,5 descendants par femelle) et la plus faible pour les rondins sans cage (moyenne 0,9 descendants par femelle). La densité de galeries d'I. typographus était voisine dans les différents traitements. Les différences de production observées entre les traitements ne pouvaient donc pas être provoquées par des variations du niveau de compétition intraspécifique. Il n'y a pas eu de différence de production de scolyte ou de densité de larves deT. formicarius entre les rondins portant 4 couples deT. formicarius et ceux portant 8 couples (moyenne 2,5 descendants par femelle). Ceci indique qu'il existe une interférence entre les individus (ex.: cannibalisme) deT. formicarius et que le niveau maximal de prédation était atteint. La prédation par des larves deMetedera spp.(Diptera, Dolichopodidae), Thanasimus spp. et d'autres Coléoptères ainsi que le parasitisme par des Hyménoptères (Pteromalidae) est probablement la cause de la faible production de scolytes des rondins sans cage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berryman, A. A. — 1973. Population dynamics of the fir engraver,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). I. Analysis of population behaviour and survival from 1964 to 1971. —Can. Ent., 105, 1465–1488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, A. A. — 1966a. Studies on the behavior and development ofEnoclerus lecontei (Wolcott), a predator of the western pine beetle. —Can. Ent., 98, 519–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, A. A. — 1966b. Factors influencing oviposition, and effect of temperature on development and survival ofEnoclerus lecontei eggs. —Can. Ent., 98, 579–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butovitsch, V. — 1941. Studien über die Massenvermehrung vonIps typographus in den vom Dezembersturm 1931 heimgesuchten Wäldern von Nord-Uppland. —Medd. Statens Skogsförsöksanstalt, 32, 291–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, T. — Estimating the number of spruce bark beetles (Ips typographus L.) emerging through the same exit hole; a factor of importance for population estimates. Division of Forest Entomology, Swedish Univ. Agr. Sciences. 34 p. (in Swedish with English abstract).

  • Eckstein, F. — 1921. Über die Lebenswise vonThanasimus (Clerus) formicarius Latr. —Forstwiss. Centralblatt, 1921 (2), 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsslund, K.-H. — Till kännedom om myrbaggens (Clerus formicarius L.) biologi. —Sv. Skogsvårdsfören. Tidskr., 7, 95–98 (in Swedish).

  • Gauss, R. — 1954. Der AmeisenbuntkäferThanasimus (Clerus) formicarius Latr. als Borkenkäferfeind, pp. 471–429 inWellenstein G. (ed.), Die grosse Borkenkäferkalamität in Südwestdeutschland 1944–1951. Ringingen.

  • Hopping, G. R. — 1947. Notes on the seasonal development ofMedetera aldrichii Wheeler (Diptera, Dolichopodidae) as a predator of the douglas fir bark beetleDendroctonus pseudtsugae Hopkins. —Can. Ent., 79, 150–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iljinsky, A. — 1931. Zur Frage der Gesetzmässigkeiten in der Vermehrung des grossen achtzähnigen Borkenkäfers (Ips typographus L.), der Methodik seiner Erlernung und seiner Bekämpfung im Walde. Wissensch. Ausgebenserie, Staatsinst, wissensch. Forschung, Fortswirtsch., und Holzindustrie 1, 49–76. Charkow (in Ukrainian with German summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekander, B. — 1972. A massoutbreak ofIps typographus in Gästrikland Central Sweden, in 1945–1952. Res. note 10, Dept of Forest Zoology, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, 39 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linit, M. J. &Stephen, F. M. — 1983. Parasite and predator component of witin-tree soutern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) mortality. —Can. Ent., 115, 679–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCambridge, W. F. &Knight, F. B. — 1972. Factors affecting spruce beetles during a small outbreak. —Ecology, 53, 830–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. C. — 1984. Effect of exclusion of insect associates onIps calligraphus (Germ.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) brood emergence. —Z. angew. Ent., 97, 298–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. J. — 1985. Some observations on the role of predation in the natural regulation ofIps typographus populations. —Z. angew. Ent., 99, 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuorteva, M. — 1956. Über den Fichtenstamm-Bastkäfer,Hyurgops palliatus Gyll., und seine insektenfeinde. —Acta Ent. Fenn., 13, 1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuorteva, M. — 1959. Untersuchungen über einige in den Frassbildern der Borkenkäfer lebende Medetera-Arten (Dipt., Dolichopodidae). —Ann. Ent. Fenn., 25, 192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Person, H. L. — 1940. The cleridThanasimus lecontei (Wolc.) as a factor in the control of the western pine beetle. —J. Forestry, 38, 390–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersen, H. &Tvermyr, S. — 1971. Granbarkbillens naturlige fiender. —Skogeieren, 12/1971, 24–25 (in Norwegian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. W. — 1957. The bark beetle complex associated with lodgepole pine slash in Alberta. Part III-Notes on the biology of several predators with special reference toEnoclerus sphegeus Fab. (Coleoptera, Cleridae) and two species of mites. —Can. Ent. 89, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, M. A. &Goyer, R. A. — 1986. the impact of beneficial insects onIps spp. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) bark beetles in felled loblolly and slash pines in Louisiana. —Environ. Entomol., 15, 1220–1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risberg, B. — 1985. Estimation ofIps typographus damage in Värmland 1971–1982 by correcting and supplementing earlier results from sketch mappingSveriges Skogsvårdsförb.Tidskr., 2, 21–31 (in Swedish with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlyter, F., Anderbrant, O., Harding, S. &Ravn, H. P. — 1984. Offspring per emergence hole at different attack densities in the bark beetle,Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). —Z. angew. Ent., 97, 244–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalenhorst, W. — 1958. Grundzüge der Populationsdynamik des grossen FichtenborkenkäfersIps typographus L. Schriftenreihe Forstl. Fakult. Göttingen Bd. 21, 126 p. Frankfurt/M.

  • Thatcher, R. C. &Pickard, L. S. — 1966. The clerid beetle,Thanasimus dubius, as a predator of the southern pine beetle. —J. econ. Entomol., 59, 955–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weslien, J. &Regnander, J. — 1990. Colonization densities and offspring production in the bark beetleIps typographus in standing spruce trees. —J. appl. Ent., 109, 358–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinovjev, G. A. — 1957. A contribution to the study of significance of biotic factors in natural control of bark and wood borers. —Rev. Entomol. URSS, 36, 322–354 (in Russian with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weslien, J., Regnander, J. The influence of natural enemies on brood production inIps typographus (Col. scolytidae) with special reference to egg-laying and predation byThanasimus formicarius (Col.: Cleridae) . Entomophaga 37, 333–342 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372435

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372435

Key-Words

Mots Clés

Navigation