Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Routine compared with nonscheduled follow-up of patients with “curative” surgery for colorectal cancer

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The main rationale for follow-up of colorectal cancer patients resected for “cure” is that early detection and treatment of recurrence and metachronous disease should result in improved survival. Our purpose was to assess in a prospective fashion the impact on survival of a follow-up program versus that of undergoing nonscheduled visits.

Methods: Within the 14-year period from 1975 through 1988, a prospective study was carried out on 800 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma radically resected with no evidence of synchronous cancers of the colon and rectum or in other organs, of whom 322 patients were to attend a 5-year follow-up, and 478 patients were free to make nonscheduled visits on account of symptoms.

Results: Asymptomatic recurrence was found at follow-up in 92 (28%) of 322 patients, whereas 175 (36%) of 478 patients had a symptomatic recurrence detected at a nonscheduled visit. Diagnosis of resectable recurrence was established within a median time of 21.5 months. Surgical resection of recurrence was performed in 30 (32%) of 92 and in 13 (7%) of 175 patients (32 vs. 7%;p<0.001). Resection was curative in 13 (14%) of 92 and in two (1%) of 175. Five-year survival of resected recurrence was 10% in 30 of 92 patients and 0.8% in 13 of 175 (10 vs. 0.8%;p<0.01). Two patients are alive with no evidence of disease or two (2%) of 92. Metachronous colorectal lesions were treated for cure in 63 (19.5%) of 322 patients. The effectiveness of scheduled follow-up was 4% (13 of 322 patients).

Conclusions: These results underline the rationale for a follow-up program in early detection and surgical treatment of recurrent disease in patients operated on for colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ekelund G. The colorectal surgeon's scientific and economic responsibility.Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:728–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beart RW, Metzger PP, O'Connel MJ, Schutt AJ. Postoperative screening of patients with carcinoma of the colon.Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:585–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nava H, Pagana TJ. Postoperative surveillance of colorectal cancer.Cancer 1982;49:1043–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tornqvist A, Ekelund G, Leandoer L. The value of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal carcinoma.Br J Surg 1982;69:725–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beart RW, O'Connel MJ. Postoperative follow-up of patients with carcinoma of the colon.Mayo Clin Proc 1983;58:361–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hughes KS, Simon R, Songhorabodi S, et al. Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases: a multi-institutional study of patterns of recurrence.Surgery 1986;1000:278–84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vons C, Houry S, Lacaine F, Huguier M. Treatment of local recurrence after primary restorative resection or Hartmann's operation for carcinoma of the colon and rectum.Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:227–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Deichgraeber E, Hansen L. Follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: design of a randomized study.Scand J Gastroenterol 1988;149(suppl):159–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballantyne GH, Modlin IM. Postoperative follow-up for colorectal cancer: who are we kidding? [Editorial].J Clin Gastroenterol 1988;10:359–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wenzl E, Wunderlich M, Herbst F, et al. Results of rigorous follow-up.Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:176–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Silen W. Hepatic resection for metastases from colorectal carcinoma is of dubious value.Arch Surg 1989;124:1021–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hulton NR, Hargreaves AW. Is long-term follow-up of all colorectal cancer necessary?J R Coll Surg Edinb 1989;34:21–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandez-Trigo V, Shamsa F, Aldrete J, Andersson R, Arnaud JP, Bergamaschi R, Ciferri E, et al. Repeat liver resections from colorectal metastasis. Repeat Hepatic Resection Registry.Cancer Treat Res 1994:185–96.

  14. Olson RM, Perencevich MD, Malcom AW, et al. Patterns of recurrence following curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum.Cancer 1980;45:2969–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Malcolm AW, Perencevich NP, Olson RM, et al. Analysis of recurrence patterns following curative resection for carcinoma of the colon and rectum.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:131–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mackey AM, Patel S, Carter S, et al. Role of serial plasma CEA assays in detection of recurrent and metastatic colorectal carcinoma.Br Med J 1974;4:382–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Herrera M, Chu TM, Holyoke ED. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a prognostic and monitoring test in clinically complete resection of colorectal cancer.Ann Surg 1976;183:5–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Neville AM, Cooper EH. Biochemical monitoring of cancer.Ann Biochem 1976;13:283–305.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugarbaker PH, Zamcheck N, Moore FD. Assessment of serial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assays in postoperative detection of recurrent colorectal cancer.Cancer 1976;38:2310–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mach JP, Vienny H, Jaeger P, et al. Long-term follow-up of colorectal carcinoma patients by repeated CEA radioimmunoassay.Cancer 1978;42:1439–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wanebo HJ, Stearns M, Schwartz MK. Use of CEA as an indicator of early recurrence and as a guide to a selected second-look procedure in patients with colorectal cancer.Ann Surg 1978;188:481–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steele G Jr, Zamcheck N, Wilson R, et al. Results of CEA-initiated second-look surgery for recurrent colorectal cancer.Am J Surg 1980;139:544–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carlsson V, Stewenius J, Ekelund G, et al. Is CEA analysis of value in screening for recurrences after surgery for colorectal carcinoma?Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:369–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng Z, Cohen AM, Urmacher C. Usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring despite normal preoperative values in node-positive colon cancer patients.Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:1063–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Minton JP, Martin EW Jr. The use of serial CEA determinations to predict recurrence of colon cancer and when to do a second-look operation.Cancer 1978;42:1422–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Attineh FF, Stearns MW Jr. Second-look laparotomy based on CEA elevations in colorectal cancer.Cancer 1981;47:2119–25.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sandler RS, Freund DA, Herbst LA, Sandler DP. Cost effectiveness of postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in colorectal cancer.Cancer 1984;53:193–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kievit J, van de Velde CJH. Utility and cost of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in colon cancer follow-up evaluation: a Markov analysis.Cancer 1990;65:2580–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rocklin MS, Slomski CA, Watne AL. Postoperative surveillance of patients with carcinoma of the colon and rectum.Am Surg 1990;56:22–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Safi F, Link KH, Beger HG. Is follow-up of colorectal cancer patients worthwhile?Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:636–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Northover JMA. Carcinoembryonic antigen and recurrent colorectal cancer.Br J Surg 1985;72(suppl):44–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Keighley MRB, Hall C. Anastomotic recurrence of colorectal cancer: a biological phenomenon or an avoidable calamity?Gut 1987;28:786–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Umpleby HC, Williamson RCN. Anastomotic recurrence in large bowel cancer.Br J Surg 1987;74:873–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Juhl G, Larson GM, Mullins R, et al. Six year results of annual colonoscopy after resection of colorectal cancer.World J Surg 1990;14:255–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bruinvels DJ, Stiggelbout AM, Kievit J, et al. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Ann Surg 1994;219:174–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vernava AM, Longo WE, Virgo KS, et al. Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer.Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:573–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McCall JL, Black RB, Rich CA, et al. The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:875–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Centre Médico-Chirurgical de la Sécurité Sociale, Schiltigheim/Strasbourg, France

    Roberto Bergamaschi MD, PhD & Jean-Pierre Arnaud MD

Authors
  1. Roberto Bergamaschi MD, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Pierre Arnaud MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bergamaschi, R., Arnaud, JP. Routine compared with nonscheduled follow-up of patients with “curative” surgery for colorectal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 3, 464–469 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02305764

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02305764

Key Words

Search

Navigation