Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer

Results of a survey of members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The follow-up of patients after potentially curative resection of colon cancer has important clinical and financial implications for patients and society, yet the ideal surveillance strategy is unknown. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the current follow-up practice pattern of a large, diverse group of experts. METHODS: The 1,663 members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons were asked, via a detailed questionnaire, how often they request nine discrete follow-up evaluations in their patients treated for cure with TNM Stage I, II, or III colon cancer over the first five post-treatment years. These evaluations were clinic visit, complete blood count, liver function tests, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, chest x-ray, bone scan, computerized tomographic scan, colonoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy. RESULTS: Forty-six percent (757/1663) completed the survey and 39 percent (646/1663) provided evaluable data. The results indicate that members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons generally conduct follow-up on their patients personally after performing colon cancer surgery (rather than sending them back to their referral source). Routine clinic visits and CEA levels are the most frequently performed items for each of the five years. The large majority (>75 percent) of surgeons see their patients every 3 to 6 months for years 1 and 2, then every 6 to 12 months for years 3, 4, and 5. Approximately 80 percent of respondents obtain CEA levels every 3 to 6 months for years 1,2, and 3, and every 6 to 12 months for years 4 and 5. Colonoscopy is performed annually by 46 to 70 percent of respondents, depending on year. A chest x-ray is obtained yearly by 46 to 56 percent, depending on year. The majority of the members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons do not routinely request computerized tomographic scan or bone scan at any time. There is great variation in the pattern of use of complete blood count and liver function tests. Members of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons from the United States tend to follow their patients more closely than do those living in other countries. The intensity of follow-up does not markedly vary across TNM Stages I to III. CONCLUSION: The surveillance strategies reported here rely most heavily on clinic visits and CEA level determinations, generally reflecting guidelines previously proposed in the current literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 1991;41:19–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleischer DE, Goldberg SB, Browning TH,et al. Detection and surveillance of colorectal cancer. JAMA 1989;261:580–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Galandiuk S, Wieand HS, Moertel CG,et al. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:27–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunderson LL, Tepper JE, Dosorety DE,et al. Patterns of failure after treatment of gastrointestinal cancer. In: Cox JD, ed. Proceedings of CROS-NCI conference in patterns of failure after treatment of cancer. Cancer treatment symposium. Vol. 2. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Can AW, Millian RR, Ptaff W. Patterns of recurrence following surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1976;37:2861–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tornqvist A, Ekelund G, Leandoer L. Early diagnosis of metachronous colorectal carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 1981;51:442–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luchtefeld MA, Ross DS, Zander JD, Folse JR. Late development of metachronous colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:180–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heald RJ, Bussey HJ. Clinical experiences at St. Mark's Hospital with multiple synchronous cancers of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:6–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Besbeas S, Stearns MW Jr. Osseous metastasis from carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:266–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonnheim DC, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L,et al. Osseous metastasis from colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1986;151:457–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Willett CG, Tepper JE, Cohen AM,et al. Failure patterns following curative resection of colonic carcinoma. Ann Surg 1984;200:685–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Umpleby HC, Bristol JB, Rainey JB,et al. Survival of 727 patients with single carcinoma of the large bowel. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:803–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olson RM, Perencevicn NP, Malcolm AW,et al. Patterns of recurrence following curative resection of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1980;45:2969–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Malcolm AW, Perenceivh NP, Olson RM,et al. Analysis of recurrence pattern following curative resection for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:131–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Umpleby HC, Williamson RC. Anastomotic recurrence in large bowel cancer. Br J Surg 1987;74: 873–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buhler H. Seefeld V, Deyhle P,et al. Endoscopie follow-up after colorectal cancer surgery. Early detection of local recurrence? Cancer 1984;54:791–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Foster ME, Hill J, Leaper DJ. Follow-up after colorectal cancer-current practice in Wales and southwest England. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987;2:118–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kune GA, Kune S, Watson LF. The role of heredity in the etiology of large bowel cancer. Data from the Melbourne colorectal cancer study. World J Surg 1989:13:124–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burt RW, Bishop T, Cannon LA,et al. Dominant inheritance of adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1540–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mecklin JP. Frequency of hereditary colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1987;93:1021–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Greenstein AJ, Sachar DB, Smith H,et al. A comparison of cancer rise in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Cancer 1981;48:2742–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Waldron RP, Donovan JA. Clinical follow-up and treatment of locally recurrent colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:428–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Herfarth C, Schlag D, Hohenberger P. Surgical strategies in locoregional recurrences of gastrointestinal carcinoma. World J Surg 1987;11:504–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nordliger B, Quilichini M, Parc R. Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. Influence on survival of preoperative factors and surgery for recurrence in 80 patients. Ann Surg 1987;205;256–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adson MA. Resection of liver metastases—when is it worthwhile? World J Surg 1987;1l:511–20.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ovaska J, Jarvinen H, Kujari H, Perttila I, Mecklin JP. Follow-up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1990a;159:593–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ovaska J, Jarvinen H, Kujari H, Perttila I, Mecklin JP. Surveillance after colon cancer: is it worthwhile? Gastroenterology 1990;99:1849–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beart RW Jr, Metzger PP, O'Connell MJ, Schutt AJ. Postoperative screening of patients with carcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:585–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beart RW Jr, O'Connell MJ. Postoperative follow-up of patients with carcinoma of the colon. Mayo Clin Proc 1983;58:361–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nava HR, Pagana TJ. Postoperative surveillance of colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1982;49:1043–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugarbaker PH, Gianola FJ, Dwyer A, Newman NR. A simplified plan for follow-up of patients with colon and rectal cancer supported by prospective studies of laboratory and radiologie test results. Surgery 1987;102:79–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kievit J, van de Velde CJ. Utility and cost of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring in colon cancer follow-up evaluation. A Markov analysis. Cancer 1990;65:2580–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tornqvist A, Ekelund G, Leandoer L. The value of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982;69:725–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Makela J, Laitinen S, Kairaluoma I. Early results of follow-up after radical resection for colorectal cancer. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Oncol 1992;1:157–6l.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fantini GA, DeCosse JJ. Surveillance strategies after resection of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;171:267–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Steele G Jr. Follow-up plans after “curative” resection of primary colon or rectum cancer. In: Steele G Jr, Osteen RT, eds. Colorectal cancer. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Steele G Jr. Follow-up plans after treatment of primary colon and rectum cancer. World J Surg 1991;15:583–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rocklin MS, Slomski CA, Watne AL. Postoperative surveillance of patient with carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Am Surg 1990;56:22–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Standards Task Force. Practice parameters for the detection of colorectal neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:389–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, St. Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista at Grand Boulevard, 63110-0250, St. Louis, Missouri

    Anthony M. Vernava III M.D., Walter E. Longo M.D., Katherine S. Virgo Ph.D., Margaret A. Coplin M.S., Terence P. Wade M.D. & Frank E. Johnson M.D.

Authors
  1. Anthony M. Vernava III M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Walter E. Longo M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katherine S. Virgo Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Margaret A. Coplin M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Terence P. Wade M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Frank E. Johnson M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Vernava, A.M., Longo, W.E., Virgo, K.S. et al. Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 573–583 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050993

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050993

Key words

Search

Navigation