Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is follow-up of colorectal cancer patients worthwhile?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Between 1978 and 1989, 1,045 of 1,399 patients (580 male and 474 female) underwent curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Of these patients, 350 (33 percent) had recurrences, another 16 (1.5 percent) developed a metachronous colorectal cancer, and 23 (2 percent) had cancers of other organs. An isolated locoregional recurrence was found in 75/350 (21 percent). The remaining 275/350 patients (79 percent) showed systemic dissemination of the carcinoma. Reoperations with curative intent were performed on 56/350 patients (16 percent). Only 21 of the 56 resected patients (38 percent),i.e.,21/350 (6 percent), were without recurrence at the end of the follow-up period on December 31, 1990. Despite a curative reoperation, 62 percent of the patients again developed recurrent growths. There is an imbalance between the efforts invested in tumor follow-up and the benefits gained. Further follow-up programs should be investigated in a controlled, prospective fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gall FP. Nachsorge nach krebsoperationen. In: Horbach L, Duhme C, eds. Nachsorge und Krankheitsverlaufanalyse. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1981:56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adson MA, Van Heerden A. Major hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1980;191:576–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Geile D, Lange J. Anus praeter naturalis. Dtsch Aerzteblatt 1977;74:1061–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gill NN. International stomal care. In: Kremer K, Kivelitz H, eds. Colitis ulcerosa. Stuttgart: Thieme-Verlag, 1977:80–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vons C, Houry S, Lacaine F, Huguier M. Treatment of local recurrence after primary restorative resection or Hartmann's operation for carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:227–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. Detection and treatment of recurrent cancer of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1978;135:505–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bokelmann D. Möglichkeiten der operativen Krebsbehandlung: Dickdarmkarzinome. Muench Med Wochenschr 1977;109:623–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cass AW, Million RR, Pfaff W. Patterns of recurrence following surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1976;37:2861–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Floyd EC, Corley RG, Chon J. Local recurrence of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1965;109:150–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mossa AR, Ree PC, Marks JE, Levin B, Platz CE, Skinner DB. Factors influencing local recurrence after abdominoperineal resection for cancer of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 1975;62:727–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Polk HC, Spratt JS. Recurrent colorectal carcinoma. Detection, treatment and other considerations. Surgery 1971;69:9–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reifferscheid M. Der Mastdarmkrebs. Dtsch Aerzteblatt 1975;48:3305–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kronborg O. Controversies in follow-up after colorectal carcinoma. Theor Surg 1986;1:40–6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Törnquist A, Ekelund G, Leandoer L. The value of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1982;69:725–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hermanek P, Scheibe O, Spiessl B, Wagner G. TNM-Klassifikation maligner Tumoren. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Enblad R, Adami HO, Bergström R, Glimelius B, Krusemo U, Pahlman L. Improved survival of patients with cancers of the colon and rectum. J Natl Cancer Inst 1988;80:586–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Beart RW Jr, Metzger PP, O'Connell MJ, Schutt AJ. Postoperative screening of patients with carcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:585–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beart RW Jr, O'Connell MJ. Postoperative follow-up of patients with carcinoma of the colon. Mayo Clin Proc 1983;58:361–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ekman CA, Gustavson J, Henning A. Value of a follow-up study of recurrent carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;145:895–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bühler H, Seefeld U, Deyhle P, Buchmann P, Metzger U, Ammann R. Endoscopic follow-up after colorectal cancer surgery. Cancer 1984;54:791–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Czerny V. Aus der Heidelberger Chirurgischen Klinik. Nachtrag zur Darmresektion. Klin Wochenschr 1980;17:683–9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cunliffe WJ, Hasleton PS, Tweedle DE, Schofield PF. Incidence of synchronous and metachronous colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1984;71:941–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ovaska JT, Jaervinen HJ, Mecklin JP. The value of a follow-up programme after radical surgery of colorectal carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989;24:416–22.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kronborg O, Hage E, Deichgraeber E. The remaining colon after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: the first three years of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:172–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heald RJ, Lockhart-Mummery HE. The lesion of the second cancer of the large bowel. Br J Surg 1972;59:16–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kronborg O. Polyps of the colon and rectum: approach to prophylaxis in colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 1990;15:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kronborg O. Follow-up after removal of colorectal adenomas and radical surgery for colorectal carcinomas. Br J Surg 1985;72:26–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koppel M, Bailar JC, Waekley FL, Shimkin MB. Incidence of cancer in the colon and rectum among polyp-free patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1962;5:439–55.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schildberg FW, Lange V, Thies E, Meyer G. Zur Therapie der Rezidive kolorektaler Karzinome. Chirurg 1985;56:509–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Langevin JM, Wong WD. What is appropriate follow-up for the patient with colorectal cancer? Can J Surg 1985;28:424.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fucini C, Tommasi SM, Rosi S,et al. Follow-up of colorectal cancer resected for cure: an experience with CEA, TPA, CA19-9 analysis and second-look surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:273–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. MÄkelÄ J, Haukipuro K, Laitinen S, Kairaluoma MI. Surgical treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer: five-year follow-up. Arch Surg 1989;124:1029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Deichgraeber E, Hansen L. Follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: design of a randomized study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988;149(Suppl):159–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cochrane JP, Williams JT, Faber RG,et al. Value of outpatient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel. BMJ 1980;281:593–5.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schiessel R, Wenzl E. Was bringt die Nachsorge beim kolorektalen Karzinom? Eine prospektive Studie über 8 Jahre. Wien Med Wochenschr 1988;12:263–6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Eigler FW, Gross E, Heckemann R. Wertigkeit der diagnostischen Verfahren und Nachsorgeprobleme bei lokalen und regionalen Tumorrezidiven im Gastrointestinaltrakt. Chirurg 1985;56:485–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Herfarth Ch, Schlag P, Hohenberger P. Therapeutische Möglichkeiten bei lokoregionÄren Rezidiven der Karzinome des Gastrointestinaltraktes. Chirurg 1985;56:492–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Herfarth Ch, Hohenberger P, eds. Kolorektales Karzinom—operative Therapie lokoregionÄrer Rezidive. In: Ergebnisse der chirurgischen Onkologie. Stuttgart: Enke-Verlag, 1985:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Berge T, Ekelund G, Mellner C,et al. Carcinoma of the colon and rectum in a defined population. Acta Chir Scand 1973;438:1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wanebo HJ, Gaker DL, Whitehill R, Morgan RF, Constable WC. Pelvic recurrence of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1987;205:482–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Foster JH, Lundy J. Liver metastases. Curr Probl Surg 1981;18:175.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Greenway B. Hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: resection or not. Br J Surg 1988;75:513–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. HÄring R, Karavais Th. Das lokoregionale Rezidiv nach Rektumresektion bzw: Rektumexstirpation. Chirurg 1988;595:634–8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mentges B, Mentges W, Gru\sner R, Bruckner R. Art und Prognose des lokoregionÄren Rezidivs beim Rektumkarzinom. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1988;113:806–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for General Surgery, University Hospital Ulm, Steinhövelstr. 9, 7900, Ulm, Germany

    Farouk Safi M.D. (Assistant Professor of Surgery), Karl H. Link M.D. & Hans G. Beger M.D., F.R.C.S.

Authors
  1. Farouk Safi M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karl H. Link M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hans G. Beger M.D., F.R.C.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Safi, F., Link, K.H. & Beger, H.G. Is follow-up of colorectal cancer patients worthwhile?. Dis Colon Rectum 36, 636–642 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238589

Key words

Search

Navigation