Skip to main content
Log in

The response of histamine degrading enzymes to nematode infection

  • Histamine Metabolism
  • Published:
Agents and Actions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of intestinal mucosal enzymes which metabolize histamine i.e. diamine oxidase (DAO), histamine N-methyltransferase (HMT), and monoamine oxidase (MAO), to infection withNippostrongylus brasiliensis has been examined in mice and compared to the changes evoked byin vivo administration of compound 48/80. Infection with the parasite resulted in a significant decrease in the concentration of both amine oxidases, followed by recovery of MAO and an overshoot in DAO activity. HMT activity was enhanced at the beginning of infection, then decreased markedly by days 11 to 15, and sharply increased thereafter. Histamine levels were on average only 20% higher than the basal levels over the entire period studied, except on day 4 when they were slightly reduced. Histamine is alleged to be a potential inducing factor for degrading enzymes. Consistently, the histamine releaser 48/80 significantly elevated intestinal mucosal DAO and in some of the mice also increased HMT activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. A. Mitchell, R. B. Wescott and L. E. Perryman,Kinetics of expulsion of the nematode, Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, in mast-cell deficient W/W mice, Parasite Immunol.5, 1–12 (1983).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Hatanaka, M. Imakita, S. Go and A. Yamamoto,Effects of degranulation of mast cells on proliferation of mesenchymal cells in the mesentery of mice, Cell Tissue Res.246, 53–56 (1986).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. W. A. Fogel, M. Ulatowska, K. Adach and Z. Osińska,A sum of 14C putrescine metabolites as a measure of DAO activity. Column chromatography assay, Agents and Actions16, 99–101 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. S. H. Snyder and J. Axelrod,Sex differences and hormonal control of histamine methyltransferase activity, Biochim. Biophys. Acta111, 416–421 (1965).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. R. J. Wurtman and J. Axelrod,A sensitive and specific assay for the estimation of monoamine oxidase activity, Biochem. Pharmacol.12, 1439–1441 (1963).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. G. D. Luk, W. P. Vaughan, P. J. Burke and S. B. Baylin,Diamine oxidase as a plasma marker of rat intestinal mucosal injury and regeneration after administration of 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine, Cancer Res.41, 2334–2337 (1981).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Norrby, L. Enerbäck and L. Franzen,Mast cell activation and tissue cell proliferation, Cell Tissue Res.170, 289–303 (1976).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. P. J. M. Tutton,The influence of histamine on epithelial cell proliferation in the jejunum of the rat, Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.3, 369–373 (1976).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by Wpr 5 and CPBP 06.03.1.2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fogel, W.A., Dastych, J. & Maśliński, C. The response of histamine degrading enzymes to nematode infection. Agents and Actions 23, 304–306 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02142571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02142571

Keywords

Navigation