Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic relationships amongTetrahymena species determined using the polymerase chain reaction

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The species of theTetrahymena pyriformis complex present a conundrum with regard to their highly conservative morphology and widely divergent molecular characteristics. We have investigated the phylogenetic relationships among these species using the nucleotide sequences from the histone H3II/H4II region of the genome. This region includes portions of the two histone coding sequences, as well as the intergenic region. The DNA sequences of these regions were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the sequence of each was determined. Nucleotide substitutions and insertions/deletions within this set of sequences were compared to determine the phylogenetic relationships among the species of the complex. These data yield phylogenetic trees with identical topologies when different tree-building routines are used, indicating that the data are very robust.Glaucoma chattoni was used as an outgroup to root the trees for this analysis. The genome organization ofG. chattoni and the divergence of its histone H3II/H4II region sequence relative to those of the complex clearly indicate that this species has diverged considerably from the complex. These results show that PCR amplification analysis is feasible over considerable evolutionary distances. However, DNA-DNA hybridization may be more useful than sequence analysis in resolving the relationships among the closely related species in the complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen SL, Li CI (1974) Nucleotide sequence divergence among DNA fractions of different syngens ofTetrahymena pyriformis. Biochem Genet 12:213–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borden D, Whitt GS, Nanney DL (1973) Electrophoretic characterization of classicalTetrahymena pyriformis strains. J Protozool 20:693–700

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carle GF, Frank M, Olson MV (1986) Electrophoretic separation of large DNA molecules by periodic inversion of the electric field. Science 232:65–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conover RK, Brunk CF (1986) Characterization of the macronuclear DNA of different species ofTetrahymena. J Mol Evol 24:143–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corliss JO (1973) History, taxonomy, ecology, and evolution of species ofTetrahymena. In: Elliott AM (ed) Biology ofTetrahymena. Dowden Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsburg PA, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux J, Haeberli P, Smithies O (1984) A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res 12:387–396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1987) Estimation of hominoid phylogeny from a DNA hybridization data set. J Mol Evol 26:123–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furgason WH (1940) The significant cytosomal pattern of the “Glaucoma-Colpidium group” and a proposed new genus and species,Tetrahymena geleii. Arch Protistenk 94:224–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz S, Bowen JK, Bannon GA, Gorovsky MA (1987) Unusual feature of transcribed and translated regions of the histone H4 gene family ofTetrahymena thermophila. Nucleic Acids Res 15:141–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katzen AL, Cann GM, Blackburn EH (1981) Sequence-specific fragmentation of macronuclear DNA in a holotrichous ciliate. Cell 24:313–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Medlin L, Elwood HJ, Stickel S, Sogin ML (1988) The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. Gene 71:491–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis KB, Faloona FA (1987) Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol 155:335–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nanney DL, McCoy JW (1976) Characterization of the species of theTetrahymena pyriformis complex. Trans Am Microsc Soc 95:664–682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nanney DL, Cooper LE, Simon EM, Whitt GS (1980) Isozyme characterization of three mating groups of theTetrahymena pyriformis complex. J Protozool 27:451–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanney DL, Meyer EB, Simon EM, Preparata RM (1989) Comparison of ribosomal and isozyme phylogenies of tetrahymenine ciliates. J Protozool 36:1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Needleman S, Wunsch C (1970) A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 48:443–451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preparata RM, Meyer EB, Preparata FP, Simon EM, Vossbrinck CR, Nanney DL (1989) Ciliate evolution: the ribosomal phylogenies of theTetrahymena ciliates. J Mol Evol 28:421–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1988) Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis (NTSYS)-PC version 1.4. Exeter Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis KB, Horn GT, Erlich HA, Arnheim N (1985) Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequence and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230:1350–1354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi RG, Horn TT, Mullis KB, Erlich HA (1988) Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239:487–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE (1983) Phylogeny and classification of birds based on the data of DNA-DNA hybridization. Curr Ornithol 1:245–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Sogin ML, Ingold A, Karlok M, Neilsen H, Engberg J (1986) Phylogenetic evidence for the acquisition of ribosomal RNA introns subsequent to the divergence of some of the majorTetrahymena groups. EMBO J 5:3625–3630

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford D (1989) PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Beta 4: version 3.0. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bell CT (1985) 5S and 5.8S ribosomal RNA sequences inTetrahymena thermophila andTetrahymena pyriformis. J Protozool 32:640–644

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bell CT (1986) 5S and 5.8S ribosomal evolution in the suborder Tetrahymenina (Ciliophora: Hymenostomatida). J Mol Evol 22:231–236

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brunk, C.F., Kahn, R.W. & Sadler, L.A. Phylogenetic relationships amongTetrahymena species determined using the polymerase chain reaction. J Mol Evol 30, 290–297 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099999

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02099999

Key words

Navigation