Skip to main content
Log in

On the Mössbauer isomer shift studies of the electronic structure of Sn implanted AIIIBV compounds

  • Published:
Hyperfine Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent Mössbauer isomer shift (IS) measurements on119Sn impurities substitutionally implanted in several AIIIBV compounds are interpreted in terms of their electronic structure. Since tin can replace both the A and the B atoms, two different IS lines arise corresponding to the donor and acceptor Sn impurities. To calculate the electronic configuration of ionized tin donors and acceptors and the relevant electron contact densities, a Green-function procedure is used based on the parametrized tight-binding approximation including relativistic wave functions. It turns out that with ionized Sn acceptors, the impurity is formed by a small cluster containing the tin atom in its neutral configuration rather than by a single negative Sn ion as might be anticipated at first sight. On the other hand, in the donor case the positive Sn ion plays the dominant role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.D. Dunlap and G.M. Kalvius, in: Mössbauer isomer shifts, ed. G.K. Shenoy and F.E. Wagner (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978) p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A recent review on Mössbauer IS can be found in Mössbauer isomer shifts (see above).

  3. E. Antoncik, in: Electrons in crystalline solids (IAEA, Vienna, 1973) p. 461.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Weyer, A. Nylandsted-Larsen, B.I. Deutch, J.U. Andersen and E. Antoncik, Hyp. Int. 1 (1975) 93. G. Weyer, J.W. Petersen and S. Damgaard, Hyp. Int. 10 (1981) 775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Antoncik, Proc. Int. Conf. on lattice defects in semiconductors, Freiburg, 1974. Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 23 (London, 1975) p. 565.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Antoncik, Hyp. Int. 1 (1976) 329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Antoncik, Hyp. Int. 11 (1981) 265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Antoncik, Phys. Rev. B23 (1981) 6524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Hilsum, in: Physics of semiconductors, ed. M. Hulin (Dunod, Paris, 1964) p. 1127; See also W.A. Harrison, Electronic structure and the properties of solids (Freeman, San Francisco, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Weyer, J.W. Petersen, S. Damgaard, H.L. Nielsen and J. Heinemeier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 155; G. Weyer, J.W. Petersen and S. Damgaard, in: Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on defects in semiconductors, ed. C.A.J. Anmerlaan (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982); G. Weyer et al., to be published (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. See ref. p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Antoncik, Hyp. Int. 18 (1980) 161; note the misprint in this paper in eq. (3), which should be identical to eq. (24) in ref. [7].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Zunger and M.L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B18 (1978) 5449; Phys. Rev. B20 (1979) 4008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D.J. Chadi and M.L. Cohen, Phys. Stat. Sel. (b) 68 (1975) 405.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.J. Chadi, Phys. Rev. B16 (1977) 790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J.E. Lowther, Phys. Rev. B15 (1977) 928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Antoncik, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 79 (1977) 605.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.A. Liberman, D.T. Cromer and J.T. Waber, Comp. Phys. Com. 2 (1971) 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. See ref. [8] for more details where, however, slightly different boundary conditions have been used.

  20. B.L. Gu, Ph.D. thesis, University of Aarhus, 1982 (unpublished).

  21. See ref.. eq. (18) for more detail.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. The problem of the role of the ionization energies is discussed in detail by A.A. Levin, Quantum chemistry of solids (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977); See also H.P. Hjalmarson, P. Vogl, D.J. Wolford and J.D. Dow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 810.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Pantelides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50 (1978) 797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. See ref., sect. V11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Lannoo, Phys. Rev. B10 (1974) 2544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. See e. q., R.A. Smith Semiconductors (University Press, Cambridge, 1959) p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  27. As this process is more complicated than the β-decay discussed in the previous section, a comment is, perhaps, in order here. The electron capture of113Sb gives rise to a hole in the F shell while the nucleus changes into1∶9Sn nucleus; also in this case, the sudden change of the nuclear charge and the small recoil energy bring about emission of phonons. Moreover, the K-shell vacancy is filled by an electron from a higher shell taking part either in an X-ray emission or in an Auger effect. These processes occur both in the core and in the valence band, however, in slightly different ways. While the rearrangement of the core (including the valence band electrons) proceeds in a similar way as in atoms and the relevant lifetimes are rather short (10−13−10−15s), the relaxation of the holes in the valence band is more complicated. Let us add in this connection that a long-termed existence of tin ions Sn1+, Sn2+, and Sn+, which in general would be possible in the case of free tin atoms, is avoided here due to the complete delocalization of the valence band electrons. It has been shown by E.O. Kane (Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 624) and by one of the authors (EA) (Czech. J. Phys. B17 (1967) 953) that the lifetime of the holes in the valence band is determined both by the Auger effect and the electron-phonon interaction. It turns out that highly excited holes in the neighbourhood of the bottom of the valence band lose their energy predominantly by Auger transitions, while at lower energies (at the top of the valence band) it is the emission of optical phonons which governs the thermalization of holes. As the slowing-down times of the latter (final) process are of the order of 10−11−10−13s, the total rearrangement of the electron shells around the119Sn nucleus just created occurs in times much shorter compared to the lifetime of the Mössbauer state.

  28. F. Herman, J. Electronics 1 (1955) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. Antoncik and B.L. Gu, Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 111 (1982) 261.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antoncik, E., Gu, B.L. On the Mössbauer isomer shift studies of the electronic structure of Sn implanted AIIIBV compounds. Hyperfine Interact 14, 257–269 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02043477

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02043477

Keywords

Navigation