Abstract
Three-week-old seedlings of one drought-susceptible tomato cultivar (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. “New Yorker”) and two drought-resistant species of tomato (Solanum pennellii andLycopersicon chilense) were subjected to various degrees of PEG 8000-induced water stress from −0.017 to −1.0 MPa for a duration of 24 h so that their early responses to water stress could be compared. Such a comparison would determine if there was a relationship to root cytokinin levels following sudden induction of water stress in the drought-resistant species. Transpiration rates of leaves were monitored throughout the 24-h period, shoots were evaluated for leaf water potential (LWP), and roots were extracted for levels oft-zeatin riboside (t-ZR) and dihydrozeatin riboside (DHZR) using a monoclonal antibody enzyme immunoassay. Transpiration rates were evaluated gravimetrically by difference every 6 h up to 24 h. Transpiration rate decreased with increasing PEG levels and passage of time in all three species, measured at 6 and 12 h, logarithmically in the case of the twoLycopersicon species and linearly in the case ofSolanum. From 12–18 h (while plants were in darkness), transpiration rate was a function of the level of PEG only and not time in all three species. When light resumed from 18–24 h, only 5.pennellii showed no further decrease in transpiration rate over time with increasing PEG. Drought-susceptibleL. esculentum had a stronger linear decrease in LWP with increasing PEG 8000 concentration than the other two species.L. esculentum also had a higher initial transpiration rate than did either of the drought-resistant species. The two drought-resistant species showed less change in LWP with 5.pennellii having a small decrease andL. chilense having little change. OnlyS. pennellii exhibited a decrease in roott-ZR levels, which may imply a role for root cytokinin within the first 24-h exposure to water stress in this species.L. esculentum exhibited no change in roott-ZR. The levels oft-ZR inL. chilense were less than that ofL. esculentum but showed only a slight decrease with increasing PEG.S. pennellii andL. chilense, although both drought-resistant tomato species, showed different patterns of response with respect to pattern of decline in transpiration rate, LWP, and roott-ZR levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aspinall D (1980) Role of abscisic acid and other hormones in the adaptation to water stress. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptations of plants to water and high temperature stress. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 155–172
Blackman PG, Davies WJ (1983) The effects of cytokinins and ABA on stomatal behaviour of maize andCommelina. J Exp Bot 34:1619–1626
Blackman PG, Davies WJ (1985) Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. J Exp Bot 36:39–48
Burch LR, Stuchbury T (1987) Activity and distribution of enzymes that interconvert purine bases, ribosides and ribotides in the tomato plant and possible implications for cytokinin metabolism: Physiol Plant 69:283–288
Challice J (1984) Purification of cytokinins on a polyvinylpyrollidone column followed by analysis on a reversed-phase C18ODS HPLC system. Biol Plant 26:401–404
Dehan K, Tal M (1978) Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato: Responses ofSolanum pennellii to high salinity. Irrigation Sci 1:71–76
Gamborg OL, Wetter LR (1975) Plant tissue culture methods. Appendix III. NCR Publications, Ottawa, Canada
Henson IE, Wareing PF (1976) Cytokinins inXanthium strumarium L.: Distribution in the plant and production in the root system. J Exp Bot 27:1268–1278
Idetek, Inc. (1985) Enzyme immunoassay test for the quantitative determination of plant hormones. Instruction manual. September. San Bruno, California
Itai C, Vaadia Y (1965) Kinetin-like activity in root exudate of water-stressed sunflower plants. Physiol Plant 18:941–944
Itai C, Richmond A, Vaadia Y (1968) The role of root cytokinins during water and salinity stress. Israeli J Bot 17:187–195
Jones MM, Turner NC, Osmond CB (1981) Mechanisms of drought resistance. In: Paleg LG, Aspinall D (eds) The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants. Academic Press, Australia, pp 15–38
Letham DS, Palni LMS (1983) The biosynthesis and metabolism of cytokinins. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 34:163–197
Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Vol. II. Academic Press, New York
Livne A, Vaadia Y (1965) Stimulation of transpiration rate in barley leaves by kinetin and gibberellic acid. Physiol Plant 18:658–664
Ludlow MM (1980) Adaptive significance of stomatal responses to water stress. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptations of plants to water and high temperature stress. Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 123–137
Luke HH, Freeman TE (1968) Stimulation of transpiration by cytokinins. Nature 217:873–874
McGaw BA, Horgan R (1985) Cytokinin metabolism and the control of cytokinin activity. Biol Plant 27:180–187
Mok DWS, Mok MC (1987) Interand intraspecific differences in the formation of o-xylosyl derivitives of zeatin and dihydrozeatin inPhaseolus embryos. Plant Physiol (suppl) 83:29
Neill SJ, Horgan R (1985) Abscisic acid production and water relations in wilty tomato mutants subjected to water deficiency. J Exp Bot 36:1222–1231
Plaut Z, Federman E (1985) A simple procedure to overcome polyethylene glycol toxicity in whole plants. Plant Physiol 79:559–561
Richmond AE, Lang A (1957). Effect of kinetin on protein content and survival of detachedXanthium leaves. Science 125:650–651
Rick CM (1986) A love affair with the love apple. Sci Food Agric January:2–9
SAS Institute (1982) SAS user's guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina
SC-10A Thermocouple psychrometer operator's manual (1983) Decagon Devices, Pullman, Washington Stewart I, Barthe GA (1986) Problems associated with the quantitation of cytokinins in plants. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Plant Growth Regulator Society of America Meetings, pp 94–101
Taylor AG, Motes JE, Klrkham MB (1982a) Germination and seedling growth characteristics of three tomato species affected by water deficits. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 107:282–285
Taylor AG, Motes JE, Klrkham MB (1982b) Osmotic regulation in germinating tomato seedlings. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 107:387–390
Wood B (1986) Extraction procedure for EIA of growth regulators in pecan tissues. Personal communication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pillay, I., Beyl, C. Early responses of drought-resistant and -susceptible tomato plants subjected to water stress. J Plant Growth Regul 9, 213–219 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02041965
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02041965