Skip to main content
Log in

Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato: responses of Solanum pennellii to high salinity

  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The cultivated tomato Lycopersicon esculentum, cultivar Rheinlands Ruhm, and the wild species Solanum pennellii accession Atico, were compared with respect to their salt tolerance. The wild species was found to be more salt tolerant than the cultivated tomato. In contrast to L. esculentum plants, the growth of the wild species was not impaired by the high salinity (Table 1), although the latter accumulated more Cl and Na+ ions and its K+ level decreased under salinity (Tables 3, 4, 5). The smaller increase in water deficit under salinity in the wild species, probably resulted from its higher accumulation of ions (Table 2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernstein, L.: Osmotic adjustment of plants to saline media. II. Dynamic phase. Amer. J. Bot. 50, 360–370 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoagland, D. R., Arnon, D. I.: The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric. Exp. Stat. Univ. Calif. Berkeley, Circ. 347 (1950)

  3. Rick, C. M.: Hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum pennellii: phytogenetic and cytogenetic significance. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 46, 78–82 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rick, C. M.: Potential genetic resources in tomato species: clues from observations in native habitats. In: Basic Life Science. Vol. 2. Genes, enzymes and populations (Ed.: A. M. Srb) 1974

  5. Rick, C. M., Butler, L.: Cytogenetics of the tomato. Advances in Genet. 8, 267–382 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rush, D. W., Epstein, E.: Genotypic responses to salinity. Differences between salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant genotypes of the tomato. Plant Physiol. 57, 162–166 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Slatyer, R. O.: Effects of several osmotic substrates on the water relationships of tomato. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 14, 519–540 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tal, M.: Genetic differentiation and stability of some characters that distinguish Lycopersicon esculentum Mill from Solanum pennellii Cor. Evolution 21, 315–333 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tal, M.: Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato: Responses of Lycopersicon esculentum, L. peruvianum and L. esculentum minor to NaCl salinity. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 22, 631–638 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tal, M., Gavish, U.: Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato: Water balance and abscisic acid in Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum under low and high salinity. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 24, 353–361 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tal, M., Heikin, H., Dehan, K.: Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato: Responses of callus tissue of Lycopersicon esculentum, L. peruvianum and Solanum pennellii to high salinity. Accepted for publication in Z. Pflanzenphysiol. (1978).

  12. Yu, A. T. T.: The genetics and physiology of water usage in Solanum pennellii Cor. and its hybrids with Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Ph. D. Thesis, University of California, Davis 1972

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dehan, K., Tal, M. Salt tolerance in the wild relatives of the cultivated tomato: responses of Solanum pennellii to high salinity. Irrig Sci 1, 71–76 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269009

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00269009

Keywords

Navigation