Summary
The great advances made in Rheology during the last forty years owe much to the application of mathematics. But in some cases, there have been misunderstandings. As a result, rheologists have sometimes been unnecessarily restricted. Mathematics is limited only by self-consistency: Rheology deals with the physical world.
In particular, three terms are discussed: “infinity”, “zero” and “negative”, all of which have at least two meanings which have been confused. Rheological phenomena cannot be “explained” merely by mathematical formulation. Unnecessary mathematics should be avoided but professional rheologists must not shirk mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benardete, J. A., Infinity (Oxford 1964).
Casson, N., Brit. Soc. Rheol. Bull. No.52, 5 (1957). In: Rheology of Disperse Systems. Bd.C. C. Mill, Chap. 5 (Oxford 1959).
Markovitz, H., J. appl. Phys.23, 1070 (1952).
Oka, S., in: Rheology, Theory and Applications, Vol. III. Ed.F. R. Eirich, Chap. 2 (New York 1960).
Scott Blair, G. W., Nature (Lond.)183, 613 (1959).
Stevens, S. S., Science103, 677 (1946) etc.
Ullmo, J., La Pensée Scientifique Moderne (Paris 1969).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper was read in an abbreviated form, at aConference of the British Society of Rheology in April 1971 The Proceedings were not published.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott Blair, G.W. Mathematics and Rheology. Rheol Acta 11, 237–240 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01993026
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01993026