Skip to main content
Log in

The growth and metastasis of four commonly used tumour lines implanted into eight different sites: Evidence for site and tumour effects

  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The growth and metastasis of four commonly used experimental tumour lines have been compared after the implantation of cells into a lobe of the liver, the spleen, the left kidney, the peritoneal cavity, the thorax, the right thigh muscle, subcutaneously into the dorsolumbar region and intravenously into the tail vein or the right femoral vein. This was done to assess the importance of site in affecting metastatic distribution, and to determine whether any general conclusions could be drawn as to the role of this factor. Tumours grew at variable rates in different sites, but this did not affect the extent or distribution of metastasis. Each line gave a characteristic pattern that could be considerably modified by site. For example, in the spleen, metastasis was always extensively to the liver; in the kidney, and to some extent in the muscle, metastasis was similar to that obtained for intravenously injected cells; in the peritoneal cavity or thorax, metastasis was usually lower than from other sites; and in the liver, the metastasis to other lobes of the liver and to the lungs was modified. Many of these findings could be explained by both specific and non-specific factors operating at each site. It is suggested that interactions at the primary site of tumour growth may be very important in affecting metastasis, and that in the future more attention should be given to this factor in order to make progress in understanding tumour spread.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan, W.-S., Jackson, A., andTurner, G. A., 1984, Differences in surface expression of WGA-binding proteins of cells from a lymphosarcoma and its liver metastases.British Journal of Cancer,49, 181–191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, M. J., 1983, Anatomy.The Mouse in Biomedical Research, edited by Henry C. Foster, J. David Small and James G. Fox (New York: Academic Press), vol. 3, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giavazzi, R., Campbell, D. E., Jessup, J. M., Cleary, K., andFidler, I. J., 1986, Metastatic behaviour of tumour cells isolated from primary and metastatic human colorectal carcinoma implanted in different sites of nude mice.Cancer Research,46, 1928–1933.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guy, D., Latner, A. L., andTurner, G. A., 1977, Radioiodination studies of tumour cell-surface proteins after different disaggregation procedures.British Journal of Cancer,36, 166–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hart, I. R., 1979, The selection and characterization of an invasive variant of the 1516 melanoma.American Journal of Pathology,97, 587–600.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hart, I. R., Talmadge, J. E., andFidler, I. J., 1981, Metastatic behaviour of a murine reticulum cell sarcoma exhibiting organ specific growth.Cancer Research,41, 1281–1287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malave, I., Blanca, I., andFujii, H., 1979, Influence of inoculation site on development of the Lewis lung carcinoma and suppressor cell activity in syngeneic mice.Journal of the National Cancer Institute,62, 83–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meyvisch, C., 1983, Influence of implantation site on formation of metastases.Cancer Metastasis Reviews,2, 295–306.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sargent, N. S., Price, J. E., andTarin, D., 1983, Effect of enzymic removal of cell surface constituents on metastatic colonization potential of mouse mammary tumour cells.British Journal of Cancer,48, 569–577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schirrmacher, V., Fogel, M., Russmann, E., Bosslet, K., Altevogt, P., andBeck, L., 1982, Antigenic variation in cancer metastasis: immune escape versus immune control.Cancer Metastasis Reviews,1, 241–274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugiura, K., andStock, C. C., 1955, Studies in a tumor spectrum III. The effects of phosphoramides on the growth of variety of mouse and rat tumors.Cancer Research,15, 38–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turner, G. A., andChan, W.-S., 1985, Reduced levels of WGA-binding proteins in metastatic nodules: a site-modulated phenomena.Treatment of Metastasis: Problems and Prospects, edited by K. Hellmann and S. A. Eccles (London: Taylor & Francis), pp. 365–368.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weiss, L., 1985,Principles of Metastasis (London: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weiss, L., Bronk, J., Pickren, J. W., andLane, W. W., 1981, Metastatic patterns and target organ arterial blood flow.Invasion and Metastasis,1, 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss, L., Haydock, D., Pickren, J. W., andLane, W. W., 1980, Organ vascularity and metastatic frequency.American Journal of Pathology,101, 101–114.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, W.S., Page, C.M., Maclellan, J.R. et al. The growth and metastasis of four commonly used tumour lines implanted into eight different sites: Evidence for site and tumour effects. Clin Exp Metast 6, 233–244 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01782483

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01782483

Keywords

Navigation