Abstract
A description is given of the class of all individually monotonic bargaining solutions by associating with each of these solutions a monotonic curve in the triangle ofR 2 with vertices (1, 0), (0, 1) and (1, 1). Also the family of globally individually monotonic bargaining solutions is characterized with the aid of monotonic curves in the unit square ofR 2.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harsanyi, J.C. andR. Selten: A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information. Management Science18, 1972, 80–106.
Jansen, M.J.M. andS.H. Tijs: Continuity of Bargaining Solutions. International Journal of Game Theory12, 1983, 91–105.
Kalai, E.: Nonsymmetric Nash Solutions and Replications of 2-Person Bargaining. International Journal of Game Theory6, 1977, 129–133.
Kalai, E. andR. W. Rosenthal: Arbitration of Two-Pary Disputes Under Ignorance. International Journal of Game Theory7, 1978, 65–72.
Kalai, E. andM. Smorodinsky: Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem. Econometrica43, 1975, 513–518.
Kihlstrom, R.E., A.E. Roth, andD. Schmeidler: Risk Aversion and Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem. In: Game Theory and Mathematical Economics (Eds. O. Moeschlin and D. Pallaschke), North Holland Publ. Cie, Amsterdam, 1981, 65–71.
Koster, R. de, H.J.M. Peters, S.H. Tijs, andP. Wakker: Risk Sensitivity, Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Continuity of Bargaining Solutions. Mathematical Social Sciences4, 1983, 295–300.
Nash, J.F., Jr.: The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica18, 1950, 155 -162.
Peters, H. andS. Tijs: Risk Sensitivity of Bargaining Solutions. Methods of Operations Research44, 1981, 409–420.
Roth, A.E.: Axiomatic Models of Bargaining. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1979.
Thomson, W.: Replication Invariance of Bargaining Solutions. University of Rochester, 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peters, H.J.M., Tijs, S.H. Characterization of all individually monotonic bargaining solutions. Int J Game Theory 14, 219–228 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01769309
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01769309