Abstract
Hofstede's Value Survey Module (VSM) identifies fundamental differences in the way people in various countries perceive and interpret their worlds. After adjusting value scores on the basis of demographic features of samples in the present study, values between subcultural groupings in four Chinese-populated regions (Taiwan, Beijing, Hong Kong, and Wuhan) were compared, and strong subcultural differences revealed. A methodology is proposed to facilitate VSM comparisons using limited, secondary data sources. Propositions concerning subcultural differences are suggested on the basis of the findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beteille, A, (1977),Inequality Among Men, Blackwell, Oxford, England.
Birnbaum, P H and Wong, G Y Y, (1985), Managerial values in the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong, Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, August 11–14, 1985, San Diego, California.
Bosland, N, (1985), An evaluation of replication studies using the Values Survey Modue, Working Paper 85-2,Institute for Research on Intercultural Cooperation, Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, The Netherlands.
Earley, P C, (1989), Social loafing and collectivism: a comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China,Administrative Science Quarterly 34, 565–581.
Fukuda, K J and Wheeler, D, (1988), Culture and management in the East Asian context, pp 70–74 inProceedings of the International Conference on Comparative Management, May 12–14, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Gordon, M, (1964),Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origin, Oxford, New York.
Ho, D Y F, (1978), The concept of man in Mao Tse-tung's thought,Psychiatry 41, 391–402.
Hofstede, G, (1972), The colors of collars,Columbia Journal of World Business 7, No 5, 72–80.
Hofstede, G, (1980),Culture's Consequences, International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage, London, England.
Hofstede, G, (1982),Values Survey Module, Version 1982, Institute for Research on Intercultural Cooperation.
Hofstede, G, (1983), National culture in four dimensions,International Studies of Management and Organization 13, No 2, 46–74.
Hofstede, G, (1984),Culture's Consequences, International Differences in Work-Related Values (abridged ed), Sage, London, England.
Hofstede, G, (1990), A reply and comment on Joginder P Singh: managerial culture and work-related values in India,Organization Studies 11, No 1, 103–106.
Hsu, P, (1987), Patterns of work goal importance: a comparison of Singapore and Taiwanese managers,Asia Pacific Journal of Management 4, No 3, 152–166.
IsHak, S T and Moore, P, (1988), Culture: its impact on personnel management, with reference to Pan Pacific countries, pp 132–139 inProceedings of the International Conference on Comparative Management, May 12–14, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Lai, T L and Lam, Y W, (1982), A study on work-related values of managers in the People's Republic of China, Working paper, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N T, Hong Kong.
Tannenbaum, A S, Kavcic, B, Rosner, M, Vianello, M and Wieser, G, (1974),Hierarchy in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paul Huo, Y., Randall, D.M. Exploring subcultural differences in hofstede's value survey: The case of the Chinese. Asia Pacific J Manage 8, 159–173 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731938
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731938