Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vertebral structure and strengthIn vivo andIn vitro

  • Session VI
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The incidence of vertebral fragility fractures has increased 2–4-fold during the past 30 years and the rate of increase is the same for both men and women. To arrest or reverse this increase, thorough understanding of normal, age-related changes in bone structure and strength is crucial. The human vertebral body is constructed to provide maximum strength with minimum bone mass. The strength is the sum of bone size, cortical thickness, trabecular architecture, and bone mass. With age, all these factors change due to the remodeling process, but the decline in bone strength is much more pronounced than the decline in mass. In individuals with very low bone mass, this discrepancy between mass and strength is even more marked. Structural studies have all shown a disruption of the trabecular network with age—mainly caused by perforation of horizontal supporting struts. These changes begin in the vertebral center. Later, a decline in cortical thickness is disclosed. The biomechanical consequence of this is a 4–6-fold decrease in vertebral strength during normal aging. As the structural changes cannot be reversed, it is difficult to increase bone strength by therapeutic regimens. Focus should therefore be placed on prevention. Three avenues are suggested: (1) to use the vast amount of existing biological data in a computer model to increase the understanding of the relationship among bone structure, mass, and strength, and to help identify the intervention regimens offering the best prospects of success; (2) to investigate characteristics of loadbearing trabecular bone that does not fracture; and (3) to focus more on life-style factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Obrant K (1989) Editorial: Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures: a sign of increasing osteoporosis in successive generations? Calcif Tissue Int 44:157–167

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bengnér U, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I (1988) Changes in incidence and prevalence of vertebral fractures during 30 years. Calcif Tissue Int 42:293–296

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson PJ (1967) Variation in trabecular structure of vertebrae with age. Calcif Tissue Res 1:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schmorl G, Junghanns H (1971) Development, growth, anatomy and function of the spine. Besemann EF (ed) The human spine in health and disease II. pp. 6–9. Grune & Stratton, New York, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gray H (1980) In: Williams PL, Warwich R (eds) Gray's anatomy, 36th ed. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 756–757

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mosekilde Li, Mosekilde Le (1990) Sex differences in agerelated changes in vertebral size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals. Bone 11:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hansson T, Roos B (1981) The relation between bone mineral content, experimental compression fractures, and disc degeneration in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 6(2):147–153

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pesch HJ, Scharf HP, Lauer G, Seibold H (1980) Der Altersabhängige Verbundbau der Lendenwirbelkörper. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 386:21–41

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vesterby A, Mosekilde Li, Gundersen JHG, Melsen F, Mosekilde Le, Holme K, Sørensen S (1991) Biologically meaningful determinants of the in vitro strength of lumbar vertebrae. Bone 12:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bell GH, Dunbar O, Beck JS, Gibb A (1967) Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Res 1:75–86

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weaver JK, Chalmers J (1966) Cancellous bone: its strength and changes with aging and an evaluation of some methods for measuring its mineral content. I. Age changes in cancellous bone. J. Bone Joint Surg 48-A(2):289–298

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mosekilde Li, Mosekilde Le, Danielsen CC (1987) Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. Bone 8:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davies KM, Recker RR, Heaney RP (1989) Normal vertebral dimensions and normal variation in serial measurements of vertebrae. J Bone Miner Res (4) 3:341–349

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kleerekoper M, Parfitt AM, Ellis BI (1984) Measurement of vertebral fracture rates in osteoporosis. In: Christiansen C, Osteoporosis I. Aalborg Stiftsbogtrykkeri, Denmark, pp 103–109

    Google Scholar 

  15. Melton LJ III, Kan SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, O'Fallon M, Riggs BL (1989) Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 129(5):1000–1011

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC (1988) Vertebral morphometry in diagnosis of spinal fractures. Bone Miner 5:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sauer P, Leidig G, Minne HW, Duckeck G, Schwartz W, Siromachkostov L, Ziegler R (1991) Spine Deformity Index (SDI) versus other objective procedures of vertebral fracture identification in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study. J Bone Miner Res (6) 3:227–238

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kleerekoper M, Villaneuva AR, Stanciu J, Rao DS, Parfitt AM (1985) The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 37:594–597

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mosekilde Li, Mosekilde Le (1986) Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive: strength. Bone 7:207–212

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bergot C, Laval-Jeantet A-M, Pretêux F, Meunier A (1988) Measurement of anisotropic vertebral trabecular bone loss during aging by quantitative image analysis. Calcif Tissue Int 43: 143–149

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mosekilde Li (1988) Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture-assessed by a new method. Bone 9:247–250

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mosekilde Li (1989) Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure-biomechanical consequences. Bone 10:425–432

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vesterby A, Gundersen JHG, Melsen F (1989) Star volume of marrow space and trabeculae of the first lumbar vertebra: sampling efficiency and biological variation. Bone 10:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whitehouse WJ, Dyson ED, Jackson CK (1971) The scanning electron microscope in studies of trabecular bone from a human vertebral body. J Anat (108) 3:481–496

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mosekilde Li (1990) Consequences of the remodelling process for vertebral trabecular bone structure: a scanning electron microscopy study (uncoupling of unloaded structures). Bone Miner 10:13–35

    Google Scholar 

  26. Parfitt AM (1984) Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences. Calcif Tissue Int 36:S123-S128

    Google Scholar 

  27. Feldkamp LE, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M (1989) The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res (4) 1:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rockoff SD, Sweet E, Bleustein J (1969) The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae. Calcif Tissue Res 3:163–175

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hansson T, Roos B, Nachemson A (1980) The bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae. Spine (5) 1:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keller TS, Hansson TH, Abram AC, Spengler DM, Panjabi MM (1989) Regional variations in the compressive properties of lumber vertebral trabeculae: effects of disc degeneration. Spine (14) 9:1012–1019

    Google Scholar 

  31. Galante J, Rostoker W, Ray RD (1970) Physical properties of trabecular bone. Calcif Tissue Res 5:236–246

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jensen KS, Mosekilde Li, Mosekilde Le (1990) A model of vertebral trabecular bone architecture and its mechanical properties. Bone 11:417–423

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kurowski P, Kubo A (1986) The relationship of degeneration of the invertebral disc to mechanical loading conditions on lumbar vertebrae. Spine (11) 7:726–732

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reeve J (1986) A stochastic analysis of iliac trabecular bone dynamics. Clin Orthop Rel Res 213:264–278

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Connective Tissue Biology, Institute of Anatomy, University of Aarhus, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Lis Mosekilde

Authors
  1. Lis Mosekilde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mosekilde, L. Vertebral structure and strengthIn vivo andIn vitro . Calcif Tissue Int 53 (Suppl 1), S121–S126 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01673420

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01673420

Key words

Search

Navigation