Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nuclear ultrastructure: Condensed chromatin in plants is species-specific (karyotypical), but not tissue-specific (functional)

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In contrast to mammalian cell nuclei those of plants display nearly an identical ultrastructure in all developmental stages and tissues. This indicates that the gross organization of chromatin is species-specific, but not tissue-specific and function-dependent. The species-specific nuclear ultrastructure is determined by the basic nuclear DNA content (2 C value). The higher the DNA content, the more the euchromatin remains in the condensed state during interphase, but to a lower coiling order than the heterochromatin.

Some difficulties in the interpretation of electron micrographs of cell nuclei, and the possible role of repetitive DNA sequences in the karyotypical condensation of euchromatin in plants are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allfrey, V. G., Littau, V. C., Mirsky, A. E., 1963: On the role of histones in regulating RNA synthesis in the cell nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.49, 414–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, G., Zetterberg, A., 1972: The role of nuclear proteins in RNA synthesis. Exp. Cell Res.75, 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, A. L., Zeuthen, J., 1977: Higher-order structure of mitotic chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.42, 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, P., 1977: Determinants of nuclear chromatm structure in Angiosperms. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. Biol. Végét., Ser.12, 18, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, M., Orf, J. W., Sina, B. J., Kreber, R. A., Callahan, M. A., Snyder, L. A., 1977: Satellite DNA, H 1 histone, and heterochromatin inDrosophila virilis. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.42, 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. D., Lawson, G. M., Hsiang, M. W., 1977: H 1 histone and the condensation of chromatin and DNA. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.42, 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derenzini, M., Lorenzoni, E., Marinozzi, V., Barsotti, P., 1977: Ultrastructural cytochemistry of active chromatin in regenerating rat hepatocytes. J. Ultrastruct. Res.59, 250–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doutreligne, J., 1939: Les divers ≪ types ≫ de structure nucléaire et de mitose somatique chez les Phanérogames. Cellule48, 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, A., 1934: Types définis et types intermédiaires dans la mitose des végétaux. Cytologia5, 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, B.,Nagl, W., 1979: Chromatin organization and repetitive DNA inAnacyclus andAnthemis (Asteraceae). Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl.2, in press.

  • Griffith, J. D., Christiansen, G., 1977: The multifunctional role of histone H 1, probed with the SV 40 minichromosome. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.42, 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurley, L. R., D'Anna, J. A., Barham, S. S., Deaven, L. L., Tobey, R. A., 1978: Histone phosphorylation and chromatin structure during mitosis in Chinese hamster cells. Europ. J. Biochem.84, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C., 1962: Differential rate in RNA synthesis between euchromatin and heterochromatin. Exp. Cell Res.27, 332–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanny, J. C., Gontcharoff, M., 1978: Etude en microscopie électronique et par cytophotométrie à balayage de la structure et de la distribution de la chromatine dans les noyaux des cellules cartilagineuses deTrituras cristatus âgés au cours de la régénération. W. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol.184, 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowska, M., Maszewski, J., 1978: Ultrastructure of the nuclei during different phases of the cell cycle in antheridial filaments ofChara vulgaris L. Protoplasma96, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine, J. G., 1974: Ultrastructural organization of plant cell nuclei. In: The cell nucleus Vol. 1 (Busch, H., ed.), pp. 149–185. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, V., Srivastava, L. M., 1976: Nuclear changes during differentiation of xylem vessel elements. Cytobiologie12, 220–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, M. I., Degtyarev, S. V., 1978: Periodically interspersed repetitive sequences may govern higher-order DNA coiling in chromatin and chromosomes. Mol. Biol. Rep.4, 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagl, W., 1976: Zellkern und Zellzyklen. Stuttgart: Ulmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977 a: Nuclear structures during cell cycles. In: Mechanisms and control of cell division (Rost, T. L., Gifford, E. M., Jr., eds.), pp. 147–193. Stroudsburg, PA, U.S.A.: Dowden, Hutchison & Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, 1977 b: Early and late DNA replication in respectively condensed and decondensed heterochromatin ofAllium carinatum. Protoplasma91, 389–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1979: Condensed chromatin in animal and plant cell nuclei: fundamental differences. Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl.2, in press.

  • -Fusenig, H.-P., 1979: Types of chromatin organization in plant nuclei. Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl.2, in press.

  • -Fuhrmann, B.,Weber, K., in preparation: Heterochromatin is a macro-solenoidal structure.

  • Olins, A. L., Olins, D. E., 1974: Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science183, 330–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudet, P., Gross-Bellard, M., Chambon, B., 1975: Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit. Cell4, 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, J. R., Laemmli, U. K., 1977: The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell12, 817–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pera, F., Wolf, U., 1967: DNS-Replikation und Morphologie der X-Chromosomen während der Syntheseperiode beiMicrotus agrestis. Chromosoma22, 378–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salema, R., Brandao, I., 1973: The use of PIPES buffer in the fixation of plant cells for electron microscopy. J. Submicr. Cytol.5, 79–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, J. J., Ulrich, H., 1977: Cytophotometric investigation of DNA and RNA content in nuclei of active Strasburger cells inPinus nigra var.austriaca (Hoess) Badoux. Planta137, 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalenberger, B.,Nagl, W., 1979: Differencies in nuclear DNA content, chromatin condensation and transcription activity in the retina of the Guinea-pig. Plant Syst. Evol., Suppl.2, in press.

  • Sedat, J., Manuelidis, L., 1977: A direct approach to the structure of eukaryotic chromosomes. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.42, 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, A. R., 1969: A low viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastruct. Res.26, 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschermak-Woess, E., 1963: Strukturtypen der Ruhekerne von Pflanzen und Tieren. Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worcel, A., 1977: Molecular architecture of the chromatin fiber. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.42, 313–324.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, The University, D-6750, Kaisers-lautern 1, Germany

    W. Nagl

Authors
  1. W. Nagl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagl, W. Nuclear ultrastructure: Condensed chromatin in plants is species-specific (karyotypical), but not tissue-specific (functional). Protoplasma 100, 53–71 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01276301

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01276301

Keywords

Search

Navigation