Skip to main content
Log in

Uncontrollability versus perceived failure as determinants of subsequent performance deficits

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment is reported that attempted to dissociate the effects of uncontrollability from those of failure in the standard learned helplessness induction procedure involving instrumental tasks. The task was administered to both university and high school students. The primary finding was a grade by controllability interaction, whereby uncontrollability had a larger effect for university students who became much more helpless. Further analysis revealed that while controllability or uncontrollability was the main determinant of university student performance, the performance of the high school students depended primarily upon success or failure. Perhaps we have previously generalized too widely from a restricted subject population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E. P., & Teasdale, J. D. Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1978,87 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys, N. J., & Winefield, A. H. Learned helplessness in high school students following experience of noncontingent rewards.Journal of Research in Personality 1982,16 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, J. C., Metalsky, G. T., & Lavelle, T. L. Learned helplessness as experimenter-induced failure and its alleviation with attentional redeployment.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1980,89 350–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Reppucci, N. D. Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973,25 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiroto, D. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. Generality of learned helplessness in man.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,31 311–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, E., & Winefield, A. H. Achievement motivation, psychological reactance, and learned helplessness.Motivation and Emotion 1981,5 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P.Helplessness. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M. Noncontingent success versus noncontingent failure and learned helplessness.Journal of Psychology 1981,109 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Winefield, A. H. Situation similarity and the generalization of learned helplessness.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1978,30 725–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winefield, A. H. Methodological difficulties in demonstrating learned helplessness in humans.Journal of General Psychology 1982,107 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winefield, A. H., & Fay, P. M. Effects of an institutional environment on responses to uncontrollable outcomes.Motivation and Emotion 1982,6 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winefield, A. H., & Jardine, E. Effects of differences in achievement motivation and amount of exposure on responses to uncontrollable rewards.Motivation and Emotion 1982,6 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by Research Grant A28015473 from the Australian Research Grants Scheme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiggemann, M., Barnett, A. & Winefield, A.H. Uncontrollability versus perceived failure as determinants of subsequent performance deficits. Motiv Emot 7, 257–268 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991676

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991676

Keywords

Navigation