Skip to main content
Log in

Systematics and karyoevolution inMagnoliidae:Tetrameranthus as compared with otherAnnonaceae genera of the same chromosome number

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

First generic chromosome counts reveal the base number x=7 for the generaTetrameranthus andRollinia. T. umbellatus from the Peruvian Amazon is diploid (2n=14),T. duckei from Brazil (Manaus) is tetraploid (2n=28). In the NeotropicsRollinia (7 species counted) has developed diploid to octoploid taxa (2n=14, 28, 42, 56). Counts of 7 South AmericanAnnona species are presented for comparison (2n=14, 28). The West AfricanCleistopholis patens has 2n=14. The Asian genusMezettia: 2n=14 and the neotropicalGuatteria tribe: 2n=28 are also revised. A detailed karyomorphological comparison, including karyotypes, banding patterns, condensing behaviour of chromosomes and structure of interphase nuclei reveals that the closely related generaAnnona andRollinia are almost identical in their diploid genomes, whereas the polyploid ones differ in their heterochromatin (=hc) composition and number of NO-chromosomes.Cleistopholis, Mezettia and theGuatteria tribe are karyologically and systematically distinct from each other and fromAnnona/Rollinia. Tetrameranthus as compared with the karyomorphology of about 60 other Annonaceous genera has a very peculiar and unusual karyomorphology which underlines its isolated position. Nuclear structures are almost identical in the African genusUvariopsis (2n = 16) and partly similar in theGuatteria tribe; both also share some morphological similarities and possibly are related. From a comparison ofTetrameranthus with several nuclear types within theMagnoliidae, a new model of chromosome evolution in primitive Angiosperms is suggested. In respect to their eco-morphological differentiation the genera investigated differ strongly from each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowden, W. M., 1948: Chromosome numbers in theAnnonaceae. — Amer. J. Bot.35, 377–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deumling, B., Greilhuber, G., 1982: Characterization of heterochromatin in different species of theScilla siberica group (Liliaceae) by in situ hybridization of satellite DNAs and fluorochrome banding. — Chromosoma (Berl.)84, 535–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrendorfer, F., 1982: Speciation patterns in woody Angiosperms of tropical origin. — InBarigozzi, C., (Ed.): Mechanisms of speciation, 479–509. — New York: Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1983: Quantitative and qualitative differentiation of nuclear DNA in relation to plant systematics and evolution. — InJensen, U., Fairbrothers, D. E., (Eds.): Proteins and Nucleic Acids in Plant Systematics. — Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1968: Chromosome numbers and evolution in primitive Angiosperms. — Taxon17, 337–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P. K., 1983: Dispersal and distribution in some small archaic relic Angiosperm families (Austrobaileyaceae, Eupomatiaceae, Himantandraceae, Idiospermoideae-Calycanthaceae). — InKubitzki, K., (Ed.): Dispersal and distribution. An International Symposium. — Sonderb. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg7, 201–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A., Diels, L., 1901:Anonaceae. — InEngler, A., (Ed.): Monographieen afrikanischer Pflanzen-familien und -gattungen. — Leipzig: W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, R. E., 1931: Revision der Arten einiger Annonaceen-Gattungen. — Acta Hort. Berg.10, 1–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, R. E., 1939: Revision der Arten einiger Annonaceen-Gattungen. — Acta Hort. Berg.12, 1–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1959:Annonaceae. — InEngler, A., Prantl, K., (Eds.): Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2,17 aII. — Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottsberger, G., 1970: Beiträge zur Biologie von Annonaceen-Blüten. — Österr. Bot. Z.118, 237–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, M., 1980: Karyosystematik und Evolution derRutaceae. — Diss. Formal Naturw. Fak. Univ. Wien.

  • , 1983: O uso de Giemsa na citogenética vegetal — comparação entre a coloração simples e o bandeamento. — Ciência e Cultura35, 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984: Cytogenetics ofRutaceae. II. Nuclear DNA content. — Caryologia37, 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greilhuber, J., Deumling, B., Speta, F., 1981: Evolutionary aspects of chromosome banding, heterochromatin, satellite DNA, and genome size inScilla (Liliaceae). — Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.94, 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984: Chromosomal evidence in taxonomy. — InHeywood, V. H., Moore, D. M., (Eds.): Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy. — Systematics Association Special Volume No.25, 157–180. — London and Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, F., Oldeman, R. A. A., Tomlinson, P. B., 1978: Tropical Trees and Forests. An Architectural Analysis. — Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitz, E., 1933: Die Herkunft der Chromocentren. Dritter Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Beziehung zwischen Kernstruktur und qualitativer Verschiedenheit der Chromosomen in ihrer Längsrichtung. — Planta18, 571–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1935: Chromosomenstruktur und Gene. — Z. ind. Abstammungs- und Vererbungslehre.70, 402–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M., Waha, M., 1984: Sporoderm characters ofTetrameranthus duckei (Annonaceae) and their systematic implications. — Pl. Syst. Evol.147, 323–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1985: Pollen ultrastructure and systematic affinities ofAnaxagorea (Annonaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.148, 253–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Thomas, A., 1969: Annonacées. — In:Aubréville, A., (Ed.): Flore du Gabon. — Paris: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981: Ultrastructural characters of pollen grains of AfricanAnnonaceae and their significance for the phylogeny of primitive Angiosperms. — Pollen & Spores22, 265–342, and23, 5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. A., Funderburg, S. W., 1979: Genome size in Angiosperms: temperate versus tropical species. — Amer. Nat.114, 784–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisboa, P. L., 1975: Estudos sobre a vegetação das Campinas Amazonicas. II. — Acta Amazonica5, 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loidl, J., 1981: Das Heterochromatin einigerAllium-Arten: Cytochemische Charakterisierung und cytogenetische Aspekte. — Diss. Form. Naturw. Fak. Univ. Wien.

  • Maas, P. J. M., Westra, L. Y. Th., (Eds.), 1984: Studies inAnnonaceae. II. A monograph of the genusAnaxagorea A.St. Hil. (Annonaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.105, 73–134.

  • Macedo, M., 1977: Dispersão de plantas lenhosas de uma Campina Amazonica. — Acta Amazonica7 (Suppl.), 5–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangenot, S., Mangenot, G., 1962: Enquête sur les nombres chromosomiques dans une collection d'espèces tropicales. — Rev. Cyt. Biol. Veg.25, 411–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, W., 1981a: Karyologie und ökologisch-morphologische Differenzierung vonPeumus boldus (Monimiaceae—Laurales). — Pl. Syst. Evol.138, 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawetz, W., 1981b: C-banding inLiriodendron tulipifera (Magnoliaceae): Some karyological and systematic implications. — Pl. Syst. Evol.138, 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984a: How stable are genomes of tropical woody plants? Heterozygosity of C-banded karyotypes ofProcelia as compared withAnnona (Annonaceae) andDrimys (Winteraceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.145, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984b: Karyological races and ecology ofDuguetia furfuraceae as compared withXylopia aromatica (Annonaceae). — Flora175, 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984c: Karyologie, Ökologie und Evolution der GattungAnnona in Pernambuco, Brasilien. — Flora175, 335–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1985: Beiträge zur Karyologie und Systematik der GattungThottea (Aristolochiaceae). — Bot. Jahrb. Syst.107, 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986a: Remarks on karyological differentiation patterns in tropical woody plants. — Pl. Syst. Evol.152, 49–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • - 1986b: Karyosystematics and evolution of AustralianAnnonaceae, as compared withEupomatiaceae, Himantandraceae andAustrobaileyaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol. (in press).

  • , 1984: Notes on the systematics of the Amazonian genusGuatteriella (Annonaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.148, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1985: A new pollen type, C-banded and fluorescent counterstained chromosomes and evolution inGuatteria and related genera (Annonaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.150, 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada, H., 1975: Karyomorphological studies of woodyPolycarpicae. — J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. B Div. 2, Bot.15, 115–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984: Cytotaxonomical studies on AsianAnnonaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.144, 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J., Venketesvaran, S., 1978: Constitutive heterochromatin distribution in monocentric and polycentric chromosomes. — Chromosoma (Berl.)66, 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüdenberg, L., 1967: The chromosomes ofAustrobaileya. — J. Arn. Arbor.48, 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, W., Ehrendorfer, F., 1970: Chromosomen, Verwandtschaft und Evolution tropischer Holzpflanzen, II.Himantandraceae. — Österr. Bot. Z.118, 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1984: Notes on the karyosystematics ofAnnonaceae. — Pl. Syst. Evol.146, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher, G., Ambros, P., Schweizer, D., 1980: Application of Giemsa banding to Orchid karyotype analysis. — Pl. Syst. Evol.134, 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1982: Karyotype analysis and heterochromatin differentiation with Giemsa C-banding and fluorescent counterstaining inCephalanthera (Orchidaceae). — Pl. Syst. Evol.134, 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, D., 1976: Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with Chromomycin and DAPI. — Chromosoma (Berlin)58, 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1980: Fluorescent chromosome banding in plants: applications, mechanisms, and implications for chromosome structure. — InDavies, D. R., Hopwood, R. A., (Eds.): The Plant Genome. Proc. 4th John Innes Symp, 61–72. — John Innes Charity, Norwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1981: Counterstain-enhanced chromosome banding. — Hum. Genet.57, 1–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • , 1983: Evolution of C-band patterns inAsteraceae — Anthemideae. — Biol. Zbl.102, 637–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. E., Freeman, J. L., 1968: Cytotaxonomy ofIllicium floridanum andI. parviflorum (Illiciaceae). — J. Arn. Arbor.49, 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, R., Okada, H., 1972: Karyological studies in four species ofAnnonaceae, a primitive Angiosperm. — J. Sci. Hirosh. Univ. ser. V, div. 2 (Bot.)14 (2), 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschermak-Woess, E., 1963: Strukturtypen der Ruhekerne von Pflanzen und Tieren. — Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waha, M., Morawetz, W., 1987: Pollen evolution and systematics inAnnonaceae with special reference to the disulcate Australian endemic genera. — Pl. Syst. Evol. (in press).

  • Walker, J. W., 1971: Pollen morphology, phytogeography and phylogeny of theAnnonaceae. — Contr. Gray. Herb.202, 3–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, A., 1981: Biologia floral de algumasAnnonaceae na região de ManausAm. — Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia and Fundação Universidade do Amazonas, 81 pp.

  • Westra, L. Y. Th., 1985: Studies inAnnonaceae. IV. A taxonomic revision ofTetrameranthus R. E. Fr. — Proc. Kon. Ned. Wet., series C88, 449–482.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. K.-H.Rechinger on the occasion of His 80th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morawetz, W. Systematics and karyoevolution inMagnoliidae:Tetrameranthus as compared with otherAnnonaceae genera of the same chromosome number. Pl Syst Evol 154, 147–173 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984875

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984875

Key words

Navigation