Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral responses of weakly electric fish to complex impedances

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Members of the family of African electric fish, Mormyridae, exhibit a novelty response, consisting of an acceleration in the rate of electric organ discharges (EODs), when faced with changes in feedback arising from their EODs. In this study, the novelty responses of three different species of mormyrids to shunts with different electrical characteristics were noted. The three species differed in the frequency contents of their EODs: two species had relatively high spectral frequencies in their EODs (>10 kHz), while the third species had only lower spectral frequencies (< 10 kHz). Primarily resistive shunts elicited novelty response accelerations in all three species, and the magnitudes of these responses, when normalized to the responses obtained for a shunt with no introduced resistance, were comparable for all three species. For primarily capacitive shunts, however, the magnitudes of the normalized responses were different for the three species: the two species with high spectral frequencies in their EODs showed larger normalized responses than the third species which had only low EOD spectral frequencies.

The differences in species responses for capacitive shunts, and the similarities in species responses for resistive shunts, suggest that electric fish detect the complex impedance of objects in their near field environment: a circuit model consisting of a fish emitting discharges into the surrounding water, which can be shunted by a variable complex impedance, conforms well to the data. Thus, electrolocation is a frequency dependent sensory process, and this frequency dependency should be considered in any speculation about the adaptive value of different EOD waveforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EOD :

electric organ discharge

References

  • Bastian J (1976a) The range of electrolocation: a comparison of electroreceptor responses and the cerebellar neurons in a gymnotoid fish. J Comp Physiol 108:193–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian J (1976b) Frequency response characteristics of electroreceptors in weakly electric fish (Gymnotoidei) with a pulse discharge. J Comp Physiol 112:165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R (1974) Electric organ discharge activity of resting and stimulatedGnathonemus petersii. Behavior 50:306–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell CC, Bradbury J, Russell CJ (1976) The electric organ of the mormyrid as a current and voltage source. J Comp Physiol 110:65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MVL (1967) Mechanisms of electroreception. In: Cahn P (ed) Lateral line detectors. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, pp 331–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Black-Cleworth, P (1970) The role of electric discharges in the non-reproductive social behavior ofGymnotus carapo. Anim Behav Monogr 3:1–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH (1969) Species differences in effect of electroreceptor input on electric organ pacemakers and other aspects of behavior in electric fish. Brain Behav Evol 2:85–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng AS, Bullock TH (1977) Neuronal mechanisms for object discrimination in the weakly electric fishEigenmannia virescens, J Exp Biol 66:141–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder W, Schief A, Uhlemann H (1967) Zur Empfindlichkeit des schwachelektrischen FischesGnathonemus petersn (Gthr. 1862) (Mormyriformes, Teleostei) gegenüber elektrischen Feldern. Z Vergl Physiol 54:89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1973) Electrolocation of objects in the electric fishEigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei). J Comp Physiol 87:137–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1976) Electrolocation and jamming avoidance in the mormyrid fishBrienomyrus. J Comp Physiol 109:357–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1977) Principles of electrolocation and jamming avoidance in electric fish. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1980) The evaluation of electroreceptive feedback in a gymnotoid fish with pulse-type electric organ discharges. J Comp Physiol 138:173–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins CD (1973) Lightening as background noise for communication among electric fish. Nature 242:268–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins CD (1980) Evolution of electric communication channels in mormyrids. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins CD, Bass AH (1981) Temporal coding of species recognition signals in an electric fish. Science 212:85–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer B (1974) Electric organ discharge interaction during interspecific agonistic behavior in freely swimming mormyrid fish: A method to evaluate two or more. J Comp Physiol 93:203–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff LA, Clark WL, Sachs HG (1967) Interspike interval analysis of the discharge of a weakly electric mormyrid fish. Am Zool 7:131

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller P (1970) “Communication” in weakly electric fish,Gnathonemus niger (Mormyridae). I. Variation of electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency elicited by controlled electric stimuli. Anim Behav 18:768–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller P, Bauer R (1973) “Communication” in weakly electric fish,Gnathonemus petersii (Mmmyndae). II. Interaction of electric organ discharge activities of two fish. Anim Behav 21:501–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H, Bullock TH (1974) The detection of electric fields from electric organs. In: Fessard A (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol III/3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 201–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheich H, Bullock TH, Hamstra RH Jr (1973) Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: High frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish,Eigenmannia. J Neurophysiol 36:39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwann HP (1963) Determination of Biological Impedances. In: Nastuk WL (ed) Physical techniques in biological research, vol VI. Academic Press, New York London, pp 323–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1977) Localization and identification of acoustic signals with reference to echolocation. In: Bullock TH (ed) Recognition of complex acoustic signals. Dahlem Konferenzen, Berlin, pp 239–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov EN (1960) Neuronal models and the orienting reflex. In: Brazier MAB (ed) The central nervous system and behavior. Macy Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo T, Fessard A (1965) Le fonctionnement des électrorécepteurs étudié chez les Mormyres. J Physiol (Paris) 57:343–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo T, Hagiwara S (1966) Effets de dephasage au niveau d'organes sensoriels participant au mécanisme d'électrolocution. J Physiol (Paris) 58:267–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo T, Hagiwara S (1967) A latency change mechanism involved in sensory coding of electric fish (Mormyrids). Physiol Behav 2:331–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipser B, Bennett MVL (1976) Responses of cells of the posterior lateral line lobe to activation of electroreceptors in a mormyrid fish. I Neurophysiol 39:693–712

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harlan Meyer, J. Behavioral responses of weakly electric fish to complex impedances. J. Comp. Physiol. 145, 459–470 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612811

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612811

Keywords

Navigation